I hate reading a Pearl Jam review and always having to learn their biography again. I know about Andy Wood, the Demo tape, ticketmaster, etc. Just shut up and review the CD, DVD whatever already.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:42 am Posts: 11014 Location: Mizzou Gender: Male
For their earlier stuff, yeah the biography gets old but sometime it is needed because it sheds light onto the casual fan what was going on with the band when they wrote and recorded it.
_________________ "Red rover, red rover, let Mike McCready take over."
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 44183 Location: New York Gender: Male
Cartman wrote:
An interesting tidbit....each member of Pearl Jam crawled out of a vagina.
_________________ "Better the occasional faults of a Government that lives in a spirit of charity than the consistent omissions of a Government frozen in the ice of its own indifference."--FDR
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 44183 Location: New York Gender: Male
I love reviews--even ones I don't agree with. Since my fiancee and most of my good friends are not really big music fans I am usually starved for any discussion of it. Granted it is a one way discussion, but a discussion none the less
_________________ "Better the occasional faults of a Government that lives in a spirit of charity than the consistent omissions of a Government frozen in the ice of its own indifference."--FDR
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 7:19 pm Posts: 39068 Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA Gender: Male
Why read the reviews? Consider all reviews in magazines, newspapers, etc. to be for the casual fan, and come here to get the good review. No one on this board will banter on about their history. You can get the poop from real fans!
_________________ "Though some may think there should be a separation between art/music and politics, it should be reinforced that art can be a form of nonviolent protest." - e.v.
Why read the reviews? Consider all reviews in magazines, newspapers, etc. to be for the casual fan, and come here to get the good review. No one on this board will banter on about their history. You can get the poop from real fans!
this is true, but a lot of the times I prefer to read PJ reviews from people that are not as hard-core as some of the people on this board. I mean if PJ took a dump and put it in a CD case, a lot of the people here would say it's the album of the year.
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 44183 Location: New York Gender: Male
dog:god wrote:
this is true, but a lot of the times I prefer to read PJ reviews from people that are not as hard-core as some of the people on this board. I mean if PJ took a dump and put it in a CD case, a lot of the people here would say it's the album of the year.
or failing that, at least yell at those who bothered to post negative thoughts, and attack their sincerity as fans for doing so
_________________ "Better the occasional faults of a Government that lives in a spirit of charity than the consistent omissions of a Government frozen in the ice of its own indifference."--FDR
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 7:19 pm Posts: 39068 Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA Gender: Male
dog:god wrote:
just_b wrote:
Why read the reviews? Consider all reviews in magazines, newspapers, etc. to be for the casual fan, and come here to get the good review. No one on this board will banter on about their history. You can get the poop from real fans!
this is true, but a lot of the times I prefer to read PJ reviews from people that are not as hard-core as some of the people on this board. I mean if PJ took a dump and put it in a CD case, a lot of the people here would say it's the album of the year.
I bitch about how much it sucks, but I'd still buy it. After all, I own Bayleaf.
_________________ "Though some may think there should be a separation between art/music and politics, it should be reinforced that art can be a form of nonviolent protest." - e.v.
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:36 pm Posts: 2189 Location: Back to Jer-Z
...of the new album has to say that it's different from Ten?
No shit! It was 15 years ago. You don't see Chili Peppers reviews saying Stadium Arcadium is different from Freaky Styley. Or U2's latest lacks a certain something that you can find in Boy.
Sure, mention how it's progressed (or not) from Riot Act, but biggest selling album or not, any band worth their salt is going to change sounds from their debut SEVEN ALBUMS AGO.
Yea, I hear what you're saying. If it sounds very similar to Ten, then sure, mention that. But it's kind of pointless ot be like "this album is completely different from the album they recorded 15 years ago." Compare it to Riot Act and Binaural so that people actually have a decent idea of how their sound has progressed.
Last edited by mowbs on Wed Apr 26, 2006 4:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 8:52 pm Posts: 2647 Location: Where gila monsters meet you at the airport
mowbs wrote:
Yea, I hear what you're saying. If it sounds very similar to Ten, then sure, mention that. But it's kind of pointless ot be like "this album is completely different from the album they recorded 15 years ago." Compare it to Riot Act and Binaural so that people actually have a decent idea of how their sound has progressed.
But most people (and in some cases many reviewers) aren't familiar enough with Binaural or Riot Act to make that a reasonable comparison. When people hear "Pearl Jam" most of them still think of Ten. It's not a suprise then that a reviewer would mention that, even if it's kind of ridiculous to even have to point out that a band may have changed their sound after 15 years.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
