Post subject: so whats the point of a single anymore?
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 4:12 pm
Needs to start paying for bandwidth
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 5:20 am Posts: 31173
example "Gone"
- most likely no video
- radio can pick any song of the album to play
- if its Itunes only, you might as well download the track from the album directly (via Itunes)
so.....whats the point?
p.s. i think Gone is a bad choice anyways, if they really wanted to do something cool they should have had Wasted Reprise as a 3rd
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 1:53 am Posts: 1435 Location: in fashion, the soft drinks, expansion Gender: Male
I know I'm beatin' a dead horse here, but the only point for a 3rd single would be if it was "Come Back" and "Come Back" only. Otherwise, they're just gonna tread water with "Gone."
_________________ I like rhythmic things that butt up against each other in a cool kind of way.
A label releasing and pushing a single to radio keeps stations from thinking that the album is done and over, and it keeps the record/songs name around. When the label stops working singles, the album slowly fades in other areas (press, television, etc). It's sort of like touring...you go on tour and more people get exposed to the new songs, but you also get the bonus of the newspaper articles the day after.
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 44183 Location: New York Gender: Male
giventofly_88 wrote:
really today it seems a single needs a video...and a video that can be enjoyed by a majority of people...i.e. the shit on mtv...
when does MTV play videos?
_________________ "Better the occasional faults of a Government that lives in a spirit of charity than the consistent omissions of a Government frozen in the ice of its own indifference."--FDR
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 1:53 am Posts: 1435 Location: in fashion, the soft drinks, expansion Gender: Male
giventofly_88 wrote:
really today it seems a single needs a video...and a video that can be enjoyed by a majority of people...i.e. the shit on mtv...
Videos don't really matter anymore unless they're on TRL - and even that show's influence has plummetted in recent years ever since the Backstreet Boys went the way of the dinosaur.
_________________ I like rhythmic things that butt up against each other in a cool kind of way.
So the question becomes: what are the effective, existing promotional tools left?
I still say the band should look to Bruce for ideas. Seeger Sessions are doing incredibly well, and The Rising sold a few million copies, but neither had a radio hit or a lot of video play. Devils and Dust he didn't even really try to promote, and it didn't do as well. So looking at the other two...
The Rising, of course, saw the band playing on every television show in the world, as well as doing about fifty trillion interviews. While the album debuted high, it also hung around on the charts for months upon months, because even four months later Bruce was on Letterman playing Lonesome Day.
Seeger Sessions had something really interesting, though...that documentary of the sessions. That thing was genius, and here's why: it wasn't on a big network. It was on that country network, which gets like 1/3 as many viewers as VH-1. So first of all, a name as big as Bruce is going to get a lot more airplay on that channel than he might on VH-1, because VH-1 has all sorts of other shows while the country channel is usually stuck with second-rate country stars. That documentary got played a LOT. And Seeger Sessions is just countryish enough to interest those country fans. So now Bruce has the attention of bored channel-flippers ("Wasn't that Bruce Springsteen? Go back..."), country music fans, as well as his built-in fanbase. I knew 1/2 the songs on the album before it even came out, because of that.
Of course, Bruce Springsteen isn't coming off of ten years worth of albums that people thought were wierd, experimental, and boring, so his work isn't as hard a sell. But like I said, neither of those albums had much of a radio hit, and by the time it's over I'm sure they'll both be multiplatinum.
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 44183 Location: New York Gender: Male
so how would you continue to promote Avocado then?
How much of a say does an artist/celebrity have in getting on shows like Letterman? Who contacts who?
_________________ "Better the occasional faults of a Government that lives in a spirit of charity than the consistent omissions of a Government frozen in the ice of its own indifference."--FDR
I'd try to get two more TV appearances, minimum, in soon after releasing the next single, and I would definately try to play the Grammys.
Managers usually contact shows about playing, but with a band like Pearl Jam it wouldn't be a matter of if they'll say yes, but how far in advanced the show books.
_________________ GO LEAFS GO GO LEAFS GO GO LEAFS GO
GO LEAFS GO GO LEAFS GO GO LEAFS GO
GO LEAFS GO GO LEAFS GO GO LEAFS GO
GO LEAFS GO GO LEAFS GO GO LEAFS GO
GO LEAFS GO GO LEAFS GO GO LEAFS GO
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:45 am Posts: 1836 Location: Up Yer Maw
McParadigm wrote:
I'd try to get two more TV appearances, minimum, in soon after releasing the next single, and I would definately try to play the Grammys.
Managers usually contact shows about playing, but with a band like Pearl Jam it wouldn't be a matter of if they'll say yes, but how far in advanced the show books.
More likely publicist will be in contact with TV shows. J may have their own National Press/Television person or that may be contracted out to a third party who specialises. The band and management will be involved in planning overall strategy but the label will have the responsibility of booking and kissing ass.
It is possible Letterman would approach the band and for some guests they probably do - but more often than not I would guess it happens through publicists.
More likely publicist will be in contact with TV shows. J may have their own National Press/Television person or that may be contracted out to a third party who specialises.
Yup, my bad. I was blending positions.
I'm really curious as to what's going to happen with the third single. They can't be thinking of just tossing it out there, not after Life Wasted failed to measure up. I'm sure the band would be okay with that, but you'd figure the label would want at least a television appearance or something.
More likely publicist will be in contact with TV shows. J may have their own National Press/Television person or that may be contracted out to a third party who specialises.
Yup, my bad. I was blending positions.
I'm really curious as to what's going to happen with the third single. They can't be thinking of just tossing it out there, not after Life Wasted failed to measure up. I'm sure the band would be okay with that, but you'd figure the label would want at least a television appearance or something.
Life Wasted has actually done pretty well (especially on VH1 and MTV2). They can't all be #1 singles. Releasing two hard hitting and catchy rock songs to the public was exactly what they needed to do. The fact that they both were top ten hits is great. Now they release the ballad, and hope that it does what most of their other ballads have done. I wish it was gonna be Come Back, but maybe Gone is the better choice.
_________________ "If I'm still singing 'Satisfaction' when I'm 40, I'll kill myself." Mick Jagger, 1972.
Users browsing this forum: 10Club Management and 6 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum