Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 4:38 pm Posts: 246 Location: St. Paul, MN
I haven't looked at other artists, but for PJ it's the whole show (all songs are marked "Clean" if that matters to you). It costs just $9.99 which seems like a pretty good deal if I didn't have it already.
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 11:00 pm Posts: 13226 Location: Adelaide, AUS
I have to admit I'm more than a little worried about this; is this setting a precedent for future shows?
Not only are the songs "clean" (ie: minus the naughty words), they've decided to leave out No More altogether (plus I'm assuming the Ed speech beforehand).
And of course, the biggest bugbear: the quality. It's only 128kbps AAC.
I know you could say that we've already got multiple sources for this show but what if they follow this format for their next tour? Not cool guys...
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 2:40 am Posts: 12509 Location: Pittsburgh Gender: Male
dirtyfrank0705 wrote:
Haha, Pearl Jam is turning corporate!
_________________ "i'm the crescent, the sickle, so sharp the blade i'm the flick of the shank that opened your veins i'm the dusk, i'm the frightening calm i'm a hole in the pipeline, i'm a road side bomb..."
_________________ "Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires." -- John Steinbeck
Anyway...if it's Lolla-thing not a PJ-thing, then I guess I can't get too steamed up about it.
But still, this is the only official boot (of sorts) from 2007 released so far, it would've been nicer to have at least been available to buy from pj.com in FLAC, unedited.
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 4:48 pm Posts: 4320 Location: Philadelphia, PA
The issue may be more complicated than we realize. NO MORE was a new song, not yet released, owned by J Records at the time of Lolla. All profits and rights to all previously released songs belong to Lolla, but special arrangements may have had to be made for NO MORE. Perhaps Perry Farrell wasn't interested. It may have nothing to do with censorship at all.
The issue may be more complicated than we realize. NO MORE was a new song, not yet released, owned by J Records at the time of Lolla. All profits and rights to all previously released songs belong to Lolla, but special arrangements may have had to be made for NO MORE. Perhaps Perry Farrell wasn't interested. It may have nothing to do with censorship at all.
The issue may be more complicated than we realize. NO MORE was a new song, not yet released, owned by J Records at the time of Lolla. All profits and rights to all previously released songs belong to Lolla, but special arrangements may have had to be made for NO MORE. Perhaps Perry Farrell wasn't interested. It may have nothing to do with censorship at all.
Exactly. This is probably no different than when Satan's Bed & Betterman from the Atlanta 94 show were left off the dissident single.
The issue may be more complicated than we realize. NO MORE was a new song, not yet released, owned by J Records at the time of Lolla. All profits and rights to all previously released songs belong to Lolla, but special arrangements may have had to be made for NO MORE. Perhaps Perry Farrell wasn't interested. It may have nothing to do with censorship at all.
Exactly. This is probably no different than when Satan's Bed & Betterman from the Atlanta 94 show were left off the dissident single.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
Frank
