Board index » Watched from the Window, with a Red Mosquito... » Pearl Jam




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 518 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 ... 26  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Let's actually listen to the albums: Backspacer edition
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 11:23 am 
Offline
Force of Nature
 Profile

Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 4:47 pm
Posts: 863
62strat wrote:
I just find it kind of funny and strange that a coule records in an artists career and people want to throw up the white flag and called sell out and embarrassment.

Man. I would have hated to be on the internet when Neil released a few of his records.





Image


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Let's actually listen to the albums: Backspacer edition
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 12:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar
The Snowboy
 Profile

Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 2:53 pm
Posts: 11395
The car on the left looks like a mobile phone.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Let's actually listen to the albums: Backspacer edition
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 12:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar
The Snowboy
 Profile

Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 2:53 pm
Posts: 11395
Kevin Davis wrote:
RM's misgivings about Backspacer feel extremely similar to things I've read about other artists who've historically released minor records like this, which were initially perceived as some kind of compromise of artistic principle. I don't know if it's Stip or Spenno who argued this before, but I think the position is right: Backspacer won't seem like nearly as big of a deal when it isn't shouldering the responsibility of accounting for the band's "current style." I mean, it's not the kind of record which seems destined to ever be perceived as one of the band's great records, but it does seem like some context will afford it a better opportunity to be enjoyed for what it was meant to be.


Spot on. I reckon if the next one's very different, that old adage that the last album always sounds better after the new one, will be completely justified.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Let's actually listen to the albums: Backspacer edition
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Former PJ Drummer
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 11:00 am
Posts: 16093
Location: dublin
Gender: Male
I've always said that and got made a cunt of here for suggesting it, so I really hope it does. Though this logic didn't apply to S/T in any big way for me, once Backspacer arrived. I mean I like it a little more than i did but not much. Gonna play it now on shuffle and see what it does.

_________________
At the end of the day, it's night.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Let's actually listen to the albums: Backspacer edition
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 12:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Former PJ Drummer
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 11:00 am
Posts: 16093
Location: dublin
Gender: Male
Love that crunchy guitar sound on WWS.

_________________
At the end of the day, it's night.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Let's actually listen to the albums: Backspacer edition
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 12:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar
The Snowboy
 Profile

Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 2:53 pm
Posts: 11395
I love the first half of S/T. It really unravels on the second half for me. That opinion is fairly stuck now. It's nice to have a definitive feeling about that album, because for a long time I was umming and erring about everything on it. I just think the second half suffers from too many boring songs, and maybe if the rockers on the front of the album were separated and distributed more evenly throughout, the more boring numbers would serve as 'breathers'. As it is they're just a bit boring because there's too many of them next door to one another.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Let's actually listen to the albums: Backspacer edition
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 1:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Former PJ Drummer
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 11:00 am
Posts: 16093
Location: dublin
Gender: Male
PJ almost always frontloads their records and in this instance it does a huge disservice to the whole. It could have been a far more interesting record had it been broken up and sequenced with more thought.

_________________
At the end of the day, it's night.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Let's actually listen to the albums: Backspacer edition
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 1:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar
The Snowboy
 Profile

Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 2:53 pm
Posts: 11395
Yup.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Let's actually listen to the albums: Backspacer edition
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 1:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Global Moderator
 Profile

Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 44183
Location: New York
Gender: Male
Harmless wrote:
I love the first half of S/T. It really unravels on the second half for me. That opinion is fairly stuck now. It's nice to have a definitive feeling about that album, because for a long time I was umming and erring about everything on it. I just think the second half suffers from too many boring songs, and maybe if the rockers on the front of the album were separated and distributed more evenly throughout, the more boring numbers would serve as 'breathers'. As it is they're just a bit boring because there's too many of them next door to one another.



pretty much. The first half is one of the strongest A-sides in their catalog, but the b-side is one of their weakest.


Dime---there is of course no guarantee you will suddenly love a record just because it is no longer new. It may just be an album you won't like. But it is easier to appreciate a record for what it is when it isn't a stand in for the band's present and future. And if it is a band that you normally love you'll probably find a lot to like since it's still the same musicians writing and performing who wrote and performed everything else you care about.

R.E.M.'s around the sun was a rough record when it was their current release since it was full of minor songs, few real standout tracks, and some genuinely bad songs, something basically that had never happened before with them. But once Accelerate came out and Around the Sun was just an album, and not R.E.M., a number of the charms on those middiling songs (make it all okay, electron blue, ascent of man, etc.) revealed themselves since I was no longer angry at them for not being as good as the standout tracks on Automatic for the People

_________________
"Better the occasional faults of a Government that lives in a spirit of charity than the consistent omissions of a Government frozen in the ice of its own indifference."--FDR

The perfect gift for certain occasions


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Let's actually listen to the albums: Backspacer edition
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 1:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 5:55 pm
Posts: 11320
Location: Brooklyn
Gender: Male
I don't know. I think S/T is pretty consistent. Some songs up front that I'd cut and some songs down the stretch that I'd cut. I certainly don't think the second half of S/T is as bad (in comparison to their respective first halves) as No Code or Riot Act or Backspacer. And I LOVE all those second sides.

_________________
Anita Brookner wrote:
Great writers are the saints for the godless.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Let's actually listen to the albums: Backspacer edition
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 1:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Former PJ Drummer
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 11:00 am
Posts: 16093
Location: dublin
Gender: Male
S/T annoys me. I just gave up after Parachutes right now. I'd just love to get to a place where I stop comparing records to past efforts. It's art and while we're gonna enjoy certain records more than others, making it a horserace cheapens all of it in a way. After the fugged up theme of Riot Act I can see why the writing and production on S/T were necessary at the time, i just wish I enjoyed it more than I do. Backspacer is like 2 alka seltzer after a hangover in that regard. The next step is going to be really interesting with any luck.

_________________
At the end of the day, it's night.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Let's actually listen to the albums: Backspacer edition
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 1:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar
The Snowboy
 Profile

Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 2:53 pm
Posts: 11395
Even Ten goes a bit floppy on the second half. So regardless of which second halves you prefer, it seems to be the case that all of their albums suffer from that problem.

This being the case, I think I'm going to listen to the next album backwards.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Let's actually listen to the albums: Backspacer edition
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 1:35 pm 
Offline
Force of Nature
 Profile

Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 4:47 pm
Posts: 863
I love Self-Titled. It's really solid IMO. And, it's varied in a lot of places where, say, Backspacer, is the same. No two songs are exactly alike. I mean, you could make the argument of similarity between Worldwide Suicide and Life Wasted, or Gone and Inside Job, but those similarities are superficial.

A while ago, when there was the thread on wether or not ST could be put together as a concept album, I re-tracklisted mine, and I like that version way better. Through that experiment, I appreciated... and enjoyed... it a lot more. Other than Wasted Reprise, which isnt really even a song, the weakest part of the album for me, IMO, is Army Reserve, which is still a good song.

Fuck, Pearl Jam, you're good. :lol:


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Let's actually listen to the albums: Backspacer edition
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 1:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar
The Snowboy
 Profile

Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 2:53 pm
Posts: 11395
Tig wrote:
I love Self-Titled. It's really solid IMO. And, it's varied in a lot of places where, say, Backspacer, is the same. No two songs are exactly alike. I mean, you could make the argument of similarity between Worldwide Suicide and Life Wasted, or Gone and Inside Job, but those similarities are superficial.


Surely you could make *that* argument about any album you liked. Apples and oranges. I don't care about variety much, I just want every song to hold my attention, and S/T contains too many songs which either make my mind wonder, or just make me laugh for how trite and sentimental they are. I really wish I didn't feel like that.

Tig wrote:
A while ago, when there was the thread on wether or not ST could be put together as a concept album, I re-tracklisted mine, and I like that version way better. Through that experiment, I appreciated... and enjoyed... it a lot more. Other than Wasted Reprise, which isnt really even a song, the weakest part of the album for me, IMO, is Army Reserve, which is still a good song.

Fuck, Pearl Jam, you're good. :lol:


I agree that Army Reserve is a low point, as are a few others. But I wouldn't agree that it's still good. It's a low point and pretty mediocre. I kinda like Wasted Reprise, and wish PJ did more of these interludes. They make really good live intros into other / heavier songs.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Let's actually listen to the albums: Backspacer edition
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 1:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Global Moderator
 Profile

Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 44183
Location: New York
Gender: Male
come back and the reprise are really the only songs after parachutes that I like (but I like come back a lot and it was fun to see pearl jam write that kind of song, even though the production on S/T was not necessarily the best place for it). But that first block of songs is so strong that the album still ends up ranking in the top half of their catalog (or maybe at the top of the second half)

_________________
"Better the occasional faults of a Government that lives in a spirit of charity than the consistent omissions of a Government frozen in the ice of its own indifference."--FDR

The perfect gift for certain occasions


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Let's actually listen to the albums: Backspacer edition
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar
The Snowboy
 Profile

Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 2:53 pm
Posts: 11395
Weirdly, I'd be really interested to find out what Brendan O'Brien did with Come Back... O'Brien with his Backspacer cap on.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Let's actually listen to the albums: Backspacer edition
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 2:38 pm 
Offline
Force of Nature
 Profile

Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 4:47 pm
Posts: 863
Harmless, I really dont mind the sentimental-ness. Eddie feels things very strongly, and I never read his words and thing "wow, that's forced". And it very rarely feels overly personal in a way that I, as a listener, feel like I'm eavesdropping... it's personal, but it's also intrapersonal.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Let's actually listen to the albums: Backspacer edition
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 2:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 5:55 pm
Posts: 11320
Location: Brooklyn
Gender: Male
Harmless wrote:
Even Ten goes a bit floppy on the second half. So regardless of which second halves you prefer, it seems to be the case that all of their albums suffer from that problem.


I'm gonna try something... forgive me and/or indulge me:

TEN
A: 4.20
B: 4.12
.08 difference in favor of Side One

VS
A: 4.00
B: 4.33
.33 difference in favor of Side Two

Vitalogy
A: 4.29
B: 4.14
.15 difference in favor of Side One

No Code
A: 4.34
B: 3.29
1.05 difference in favor of Side One

Yield
A: 4.00
B: 3.86
.14 difference in favor of Side One

Binaural
A: 3.71
B: 4.34
.63 difference in favor of Side Two

Riot Act
A: 3.86
B: 3.38
.48 difference in favor of Side One

S/T
A: 4.00
B: 3.75
.25 difference in favor of Side One

Backspacer
A: 4.00
B: 3.83
.17 difference in favor of Side One

2 of 9 w/ a stronger Side Two (VS and Binaural).
7 of 9 w/ a stronger Side One.

Ten has the lowest difference between sides, making it, numerically, the most consistent.
No Code has the biggest difference, making it, numerically, the least consistent.
Binaural has the biggest difference in favor of Side Two
No Code has the biggest difference in favor of Side One

Of course, this is all based on a scale of 0-5, and this is just my humble opinion.

If I were to rank these according to my own numerical consistency it would go:
1. Ten (most consistent from beginning to end)
2. Yield
3. Vitalogy
4. Backspacer
5. S/T
6. VS
7. Riot Act
8. Binaural
9. No Code (least consistent)

Obviously, none of this factors in the intangibles, the pieces as a whole, the album experience, as it were.

In order of preference:
1. Vitalogy
2. Ten
3. Riot Act
4. Yield
5. Backspacer
6. VS
7. No Code
8. S/T
9. Binaural

_________________
Anita Brookner wrote:
Great writers are the saints for the godless.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Let's actually listen to the albums: Backspacer edition
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 3:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar
The Snowboy
 Profile

Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 2:53 pm
Posts: 11395
durdencommatyler wrote:
Harmless wrote:
Even Ten goes a bit floppy on the second half. So regardless of which second halves you prefer, it seems to be the case that all of their albums suffer from that problem.


I'm gonna try something... forgive me and/or indulge me:

TEN
A: 4.20
B: 4.12
.08 difference in favor of Side One

VS
A: 4.00
B: 4.33
.33 difference in favor of Side Two

Vitalogy
A: 4.29
B: 4.14
.15 difference in favor of Side One

No Code
A: 4.34
B: 3.29
1.05 difference in favor of Side One

Yield
A: 4.00
B: 3.86
.14 difference in favor of Side One

Binaural
A: 3.71
B: 4.34
.63 difference in favor of Side Two

Riot Act
A: 3.86
B: 3.38
.48 difference in favor of Side One

S/T
A: 4.00
B: 3.75
.25 difference in favor of Side One

Backspacer
A: 4.00
B: 3.83
.17 difference in favor of Side One

2 of 9 w/ a stronger Side Two (VS and Binaural).
7 of 9 w/ a stronger Side One.

Ten has the lowest difference between sides, making it, numerically, the most consistent.
No Code has the biggest difference, making it, numerically, the least consistent.
Binaural has the biggest difference in favor of Side Two
No Code has the biggest difference in favor of Side One

Of course, this is all based on a scale of 0-5, and this is just my humble opinion.

If I were to rank these according to my own numerical consistency it would go:
1. Ten (most consistent from beginning to end)
2. Yield
3. Vitalogy
4. Backspacer
5. S/T
6. VS
7. Riot Act
8. Binaural
9. No Code (least consistent)

Obviously, none of this factors in the intangibles, the pieces as a whole, the album experience, as it were.

In order of preference:
1. Vitalogy
2. Ten
3. Riot Act
4. Yield
5. Backspacer
6. VS
7. No Code
8. S/T
9. Binaural


I'm really not a numbers guy, so don't understand half of what you did there. But for the results, kudos, even if I wouldn't agree with your rankings.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Let's actually listen to the albums: Backspacer edition
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 3:42 pm 
Offline
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 Profile

Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:23 am
Posts: 4187
Harmless wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Harmless wrote:
Even Ten goes a bit floppy on the second half. So regardless of which second halves you prefer, it seems to be the case that all of their albums suffer from that problem.


I'm gonna try something... forgive me and/or indulge me:

TEN
A: 4.20
B: 4.12
.08 difference in favor of Side One

VS
A: 4.00
B: 4.33
.33 difference in favor of Side Two

Vitalogy
A: 4.29
B: 4.14
.15 difference in favor of Side One

No Code
A: 4.34
B: 3.29
1.05 difference in favor of Side One

Yield
A: 4.00
B: 3.86
.14 difference in favor of Side One

Binaural
A: 3.71
B: 4.34
.63 difference in favor of Side Two

Riot Act
A: 3.86
B: 3.38
.48 difference in favor of Side One

S/T
A: 4.00
B: 3.75
.25 difference in favor of Side One

Backspacer
A: 4.00
B: 3.83
.17 difference in favor of Side One

2 of 9 w/ a stronger Side Two (VS and Binaural).
7 of 9 w/ a stronger Side One.

Ten has the lowest difference between sides, making it, numerically, the most consistent.
No Code has the biggest difference, making it, numerically, the least consistent.
Binaural has the biggest difference in favor of Side Two
No Code has the biggest difference in favor of Side One

Of course, this is all based on a scale of 0-5, and this is just my humble opinion.

If I were to rank these according to my own numerical consistency it would go:
1. Ten (most consistent from beginning to end)
2. Yield
3. Vitalogy
4. Backspacer
5. S/T
6. VS
7. Riot Act
8. Binaural
9. No Code (least consistent)

Obviously, none of this factors in the intangibles, the pieces as a whole, the album experience, as it were.

In order of preference:
1. Vitalogy
2. Ten
3. Riot Act
4. Yield
5. Backspacer
6. VS
7. No Code
8. S/T
9. Binaural


I'm really not a numbers guy, so don't understand half of what you did there. But for the results, kudos, even if I wouldn't agree with your rankings.


Are you the guy from that video in the pj20 dvd??


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 518 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 ... 26  Next

Board index » Watched from the Window, with a Red Mosquito... » Pearl Jam


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
It is currently Sat Jun 01, 2024 11:25 pm