Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 6:55 am Posts: 1776 Location: New York, NY
leopold wrote:
iceagecoming wrote:
The most plausible theory to me is that PJ couldn't keep putting out grunge-riff-rockery, so everyone else had to contribute in bringing a decent set of songs to the table so they could keep creating music that kept them interested as well as a lot of fans.
'Grunge-riff rockery' like...?
Personally, I think it more came from the fact that they were creating a lot more as a band for Vs. through No Code, as opposed to working from initial demos (I believe the band has said a good chunk of Vs., Vitalogy and No Code came out of impromptu jams).
Er yeah, I'm going to make a few assumptions about someone I don't know, based on shifty subjective "evidence", about things that no one bar the band members and/or their friends and relatives would know. Stellar guesswork!
OMG - WE ARE SO PWNED. I WISH I COULD USE QUOTATION MARKS AND EMOTICONS LIKE YOU.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:09 pm Posts: 13868 Location: Norn Iron
leopold wrote:
Juvenal wrote:
Er yeah, I'm going to make a few assumptions about someone I don't know, based on shifty subjective "evidence", about things that no one bar the band members and/or their friends and relatives would know. Stellar guesswork!
OMG - WE ARE SO PWNED. I WISH I COULD USE QUOTATION MARKS AND EMOTICONS LIKE YOU.
Oooooouch I've been flamed! I bestow upon you the rank of Keyboard Warrior, First Rank.
Er yeah, I'm going to make a few assumptions about someone I don't know, based on shifty subjective "evidence", about things that no one bar the band members and/or their friends and relatives would know. Stellar guesswork!
This is the nature of bands, and as fans I think it's more than fine to speculate. How the band members relate to each other has everything to do with how the music comes out. We hear the music, see the writing credits, and we speculate, cause it all plays into the music, which we are the consumers of. I personally see a gaping hole in the collaborative relationship between Stone and Ed. I think it's a perfectly valid subject matter, and it's not addressed enough. I consider Hard to Imagine and In Hiding to be classics of the Ed/Stone relationship. It takes the best of what they both do and puts it altogether, something that can only come from the 2 of them and no one else. I don't expect a repeat, but I do want to know, as a fan, where that relationship is cause I don't see it progressing in the music.
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 1:29 am Posts: 1053 Location: Durham, NC Gender: Male
cutuphalfdead wrote:
During the shows I saw on the 2010 US tour Stone was stuck out to me more than any other band member. He was more animated and into than I've seen him in years, and sounded great.
This was my first thought. If anything I would say that Stone has gotten happier and more comfortable over the last 10 years than the other way around. He is taking more solo's in the show, he is obviously conscious of his tone ( I wish McCready thought it through more. That fucking high pitched shit in the middle of Even Flow.....), his guitar and writing heavily influenced the last 2 records. I get the feeling he has a huge interest in things being a certain way and maybe gets frustrated when they aren't, but he is obviously heavily interested and engaged in this whole process (business, shows, records, etc.)
Er yeah, I'm going to make a few assumptions about someone I don't know, based on shifty subjective "evidence", about things that no one bar the band members and/or their friends and relatives would know. Stellar guesswork!
This is the nature of bands, and as fans I think it's more than fine to speculate. How the band members relate to each other has everything to do with how the music comes out. We hear the music, see the writing credits, and we speculate, cause it all plays into the music, which we are the consumers of. I personally see a gaping hole in the collaborative relationship between Stone and Ed. I think it's a perfectly valid subject matter, and it's not addressed enough. I consider Hard to Imagine and In Hiding to be classics of the Ed/Stone relationship. It takes the best of what they both do and puts it altogether, something that can only come from the 2 of them and no one else. I don't expect a repeat, but I do want to know, as a fan, where that relationship is cause I don't see it progressing in the music.
Tuolumne, would you support the implementation of an Ed/Stone-centered reality program on which the ups and downs of their relationship can be documented in full detail before a prime time audience?
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 2:48 pm Posts: 3115 Location: Edinburgh/Lincoln, UK
leopold wrote:
iceagecoming wrote:
The most plausible theory to me is that PJ couldn't keep putting out grunge-riff-rockery, so everyone else had to contribute in bringing a decent set of songs to the table so they could keep creating music that kept them interested as well as a lot of fans.
'Grunge-riff rockery' like...?
Release Black Garden Footsteps Hard to Imagine Daughter Dissident Who You Are No Way All Those Yesterdays Strangest Tribe Fatal Thin Air Of the Girl Anchors Unhand Me Sunburn Parachutes All or None
Yup - plausible theory...
You misunderstood my point. I was talking about the supposed change in leadership after Ten, and why the songwriting dynamic stopped being almost exclusively Gossard/Vedder after that album. 'Grunge-riff-rockery' was in reference to Ten.
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 2:48 pm Posts: 3115 Location: Edinburgh/Lincoln, UK
digster wrote:
leopold wrote:
iceagecoming wrote:
Also,if control passed from Stone to Ed after Ten, it's because the music Stone was writing slowly became redundant in what Pearl Jam were and wanted to be. This doesn't however make Ed to blame by default. The most plausible theory to me is that PJ couldn't keep putting out grunge-riff-rockery, so everyone else had to contribute in bringing a decent set of songs to the table so they could keep creating music that kept them interested as well as a lot of fans.
'Grunge-riff rockery' like...?
Personally, I think it more came from the fact that they were creating a lot more as a band for Vs. through No Code, as opposed to working from initial demos (I believe the band has said a good chunk of Vs., Vitalogy and No Code came out of impromptu jams).
Agreed. But it's also hard to deny that the bands sound and approach to song writing changed after Ten. The hard rock aesthetic survived through Vs and Vitalogy and remained the backbone to their records, but the grungey, pentatonic riffs that defined Ten never really resurfaced (for better or worse).
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 6:55 am Posts: 1776 Location: New York, NY
iceagecoming wrote:
digster wrote:
leopold wrote:
iceagecoming wrote:
Also,if control passed from Stone to Ed after Ten, it's because the music Stone was writing slowly became redundant in what Pearl Jam were and wanted to be. This doesn't however make Ed to blame by default. The most plausible theory to me is that PJ couldn't keep putting out grunge-riff-rockery, so everyone else had to contribute in bringing a decent set of songs to the table so they could keep creating music that kept them interested as well as a lot of fans.
'Grunge-riff rockery' like...?
Personally, I think it more came from the fact that they were creating a lot more as a band for Vs. through No Code, as opposed to working from initial demos (I believe the band has said a good chunk of Vs., Vitalogy and No Code came out of impromptu jams).
Agreed. But it's also hard to deny that the bands sound and approach to song writing changed after Ten. The hard rock aesthetic survived through Vs and Vitalogy and remained the backbone to their records, but the grungey, pentatonic riffs that defined Ten never really resurfaced (for better or worse).
To a degree, I’d agree with that, although again I think that had to do with them creating more as a band than this concisious need to take the reins from the Gossard/Vedder combo. I think it was all much more instinctual than that. Also, Eddie having a larger musical voice had to do with it. I think a lot of it also had to do with the songwriters just evolving from that period of time. I mean, a year after Porch, Ed was writing Reaverviewmirror, a year after Ten Stone was writing Daughter. I think they just weren’t being static.
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 20059 Gender: Male
Kevin Davis wrote:
Tuolumne wrote:
Juvenal wrote:
Er yeah, I'm going to make a few assumptions about someone I don't know, based on shifty subjective "evidence", about things that no one bar the band members and/or their friends and relatives would know. Stellar guesswork!
This is the nature of bands, and as fans I think it's more than fine to speculate. How the band members relate to each other has everything to do with how the music comes out. We hear the music, see the writing credits, and we speculate, cause it all plays into the music, which we are the consumers of. I personally see a gaping hole in the collaborative relationship between Stone and Ed. I think it's a perfectly valid subject matter, and it's not addressed enough. I consider Hard to Imagine and In Hiding to be classics of the Ed/Stone relationship. It takes the best of what they both do and puts it altogether, something that can only come from the 2 of them and no one else. I don't expect a repeat, but I do want to know, as a fan, where that relationship is cause I don't see it progressing in the music.
Tuolumne, would you support the implementation of an Ed/Stone-centered reality program on which the ups and downs of their relationship can be documented in full detail before a prime time audience?
i would, imo.
_________________ stop light plays its part, so I would say you've got a part
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 2:48 pm Posts: 3115 Location: Edinburgh/Lincoln, UK
digster wrote:
iceagecoming wrote:
digster wrote:
leopold wrote:
iceagecoming wrote:
Also,if control passed from Stone to Ed after Ten, it's because the music Stone was writing slowly became redundant in what Pearl Jam were and wanted to be. This doesn't however make Ed to blame by default. The most plausible theory to me is that PJ couldn't keep putting out grunge-riff-rockery, so everyone else had to contribute in bringing a decent set of songs to the table so they could keep creating music that kept them interested as well as a lot of fans.
'Grunge-riff rockery' like...?
Personally, I think it more came from the fact that they were creating a lot more as a band for Vs. through No Code, as opposed to working from initial demos (I believe the band has said a good chunk of Vs., Vitalogy and No Code came out of impromptu jams).
Agreed. But it's also hard to deny that the bands sound and approach to song writing changed after Ten. The hard rock aesthetic survived through Vs and Vitalogy and remained the backbone to their records, but the grungey, pentatonic riffs that defined Ten never really resurfaced (for better or worse).
To a degree, I’d agree with that, although again I think that had to do with them creating more as a band than this concisious need to take the reins from the Gossard/Vedder combo. I think it was all much more instinctual than that. Also, Eddie having a larger musical voice had to do with it. I think a lot of it also had to do with the songwriters just evolving from that period of time. I mean, a year after Porch, Ed was writing Reaverviewmirror, a year after Ten Stone was writing Daughter. I think they just weren’t being static.
yeah, that was the point I was trying to make all along. I agree it was instinctual. I think (unselfconsciously) they realised there was no need or interest in creating songs musically like those on Ten.
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 44183 Location: New York Gender: Male
Stone was the 'leader' of the band like 17 years ago. If he was gonna have quit the band over that it would have been a LONG time ago. If he is harboring resentments 17 years, millions of dollars, critical acclaim, legions of devoted fans, a movie about your band, and a sure fire first round induction into the R+R hall of fame later then he's pretty petty.
_________________ "Better the occasional faults of a Government that lives in a spirit of charity than the consistent omissions of a Government frozen in the ice of its own indifference."--FDR
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum