Red Mosquito
http://archive.theskyiscrape.com/

Movie: Spider-Man 3
http://archive.theskyiscrape.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=11921		 Page 6 of 26
Author:  goncho [ Wed Jun 28, 2006 3:11 pm ]
Post subject: 
jwfocker wrote:
diaglo wrote:
That doesn't disappoint me in the slightest. Too many villains, Venom being the weakest among them. You've gotta setup Venom sufficiently to make him effective, which to me, he never was. I do like the casting of Topher Grace, though, as the antithesis of Spidey/Parker. But give me Sandman any day.


I have to disagree here and rather strongly. Venom is the most developed villain in the Spiderman history that I have known. I love his character and have refused to view any movie passed the first film that did not include him. He is his opposite but yet he is not strictly evil, which adds to his complexities. Venom is one of the richest villains in the comic industry.


AT´s true
Author:  PJeff [ Wed Jun 28, 2006 5:04 pm ]
Post subject: 
Venom is not a weak character by any stretch of the imagination. He has been misused and underutilized, but the character itself is not weak.
Author:  Peeps [ Wed Jun 28, 2006 5:16 pm ]
Post subject: 
PJeff wrote:
Venom is not a weak character by any stretch of the imagination. He has been misused and underutilized, but the character itself is not weak.


*overused in the begining


venom isnt so much a bad guy as a guy who hates parker and all he stands for. he has always tried to protect innocents

to do venom correctly, he would need to be the lone villian in the movie, thankfully he is being introduced in this one and will probably be back for the next

i think the preview looks spot on compared to web of spiderman 1

from what i can see of harry, hes not really in any major getup as to be the green goblin or the hobgoblin
Author:  Ensign9 [ Wed Jun 28, 2006 8:49 pm ]
Post subject: 
Peeps wrote:
from what i can see of harry, hes not really in any major getup as to be the green goblin or the hobgoblin


It looks kind of like he just ripped out the area around the eyes from his Dad's helmet and put it on.
Author:  i got bugs [ Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:11 pm ]
Post subject: 
Peeps wrote:
i think the preview looks spot on compared to web of spiderman 1


he looks to be in a bell tower when hes ripping off the suit..which is good cuz he nees that loud sound....
Author:  jimbojones1138 [ Thu Jun 29, 2006 12:16 am ]
Post subject: 
Ensign9 wrote:
SoapMakesUTaller wrote:
http://www.apple.com/trailers/sony_pictures/spider-man_3/large.html


i think i just wet myself
Author:  ¡B! [ Thu Jun 29, 2006 12:28 am ]
Post subject: 
Ensign9 wrote:
Peeps wrote:
from what i can see of harry, hes not really in any major getup as to be the green goblin or the hobgoblin


It looks kind of like he just ripped out the area around the eyes from his Dad's helmet and put it on.


Maybe this is because Wilem Dafoe was totally wasted with his entire face covered by a mask.
Author:  BlueNote [ Thu Jun 29, 2006 1:10 am ]
Post subject: 
is there a way to watch this without quicktime and/or download quicktime without downloading itunes as well?
Author:  Ensign9 [ Thu Jun 29, 2006 1:52 am ]
Post subject: 
BlueNote wrote:
is there a way to watch this without quicktime and/or download quicktime without downloading itunes as well?


Negative.

Install both, then uninstall iTunes.
Author:  BlueNote [ Thu Jun 29, 2006 1:54 am ]
Post subject: 
Ensign9 wrote:
BlueNote wrote:
is there a way to watch this without quicktime and/or download quicktime without downloading itunes as well?


Negative.

Install both, then uninstall iTunes.


then i have to uninstall winamp and reinstall it so it'll work with my ipod, too much work. oh well...
Author:  Ensign9 [ Thu Jun 29, 2006 1:59 am ]
Post subject: 
BlueNote wrote:
Ensign9 wrote:
BlueNote wrote:
is there a way to watch this without quicktime and/or download quicktime without downloading itunes as well?


Negative.

Install both, then uninstall iTunes.


then i have to uninstall winamp and reinstall it so it'll work with my ipod, too much work. oh well...


Why would you have to do that?
Author:  BlueNote [ Thu Jun 29, 2006 2:31 am ]
Post subject: 
Ensign9 wrote:
BlueNote wrote:
Ensign9 wrote:
BlueNote wrote:
is there a way to watch this without quicktime and/or download quicktime without downloading itunes as well?


Negative.

Install both, then uninstall iTunes.


then i have to uninstall winamp and reinstall it so it'll work with my ipod, too much work. oh well...


Why would you have to do that?


itunes has this thing that disables ipod support for all other programs on your computer, it gave me hell a few years back when i didn't know about it.
Author:  ManiacalClown [ Thu Jun 29, 2006 6:49 am ]
Post subject: 
Iago wrote:
rich wrote:
i got bugs wrote:
ManiacalClown wrote:
If the 4th villain isn't THE BIG WHEEL or HYPNO-HUSTLER, I'm going to boycott this movie.


im hopin for the prowler or the rocket racer


i don't know enough about the comics to really care who they make the next villain, although done well Mysterio (i think that's his name, i remember him from the cartoon) might be interesting, although it'd probably just be straight corny.


Haha... where to find the right fishbowl?


I'm gay...FOR YOU SPIDERMAN!!!
Author:  Iago [ Thu Jun 29, 2006 12:08 pm ]
Post subject: 
ManiacalClown wrote:
Iago wrote:
rich wrote:
i got bugs wrote:
ManiacalClown wrote:
If the 4th villain isn't THE BIG WHEEL or HYPNO-HUSTLER, I'm going to boycott this movie.


im hopin for the prowler or the rocket racer


i don't know enough about the comics to really care who they make the next villain, although done well Mysterio (i think that's his name, i remember him from the cartoon) might be interesting, although it'd probably just be straight corny.


Haha... where to find the right fishbowl?


I'm gay...FOR YOU SPIDERMAN!!!


Reach out to me, SUNSHINE!

Image
Author:  diaglo [ Thu Jun 29, 2006 6:13 pm ]
Post subject: 
jwfocker wrote:
diaglo wrote:
That doesn't disappoint me in the slightest. Too many villains, Venom being the weakest among them. You've gotta setup Venom sufficiently to make him effective, which to me, he never was. I do like the casting of Topher Grace, though, as the antithesis of Spidey/Parker. But give me Sandman any day.


I have to disagree here and rather strongly. Venom is the most developed villain in the Spiderman history that I have known. I love his character and have refused to view any movie passed the first film that did not include him. He is his opposite but yet he is not strictly evil, which adds to his complexities. Venom is one of the richest villains in the comic industry.


I guess I've always hated the muscle-bound Eddie Brock character, and the over the top demonicly EVIIILLLL Venom. I think the way Venom is portrayed in the comics is cheesy and predictable. However, I *do* like the casting of Topher Grace as Parker's opposite, and I've always liked the IDEA of the character, the concept behind it is great. To me it came down to execution and it never grabbed me. The subtext and character bits are always were always overshadowed by Venom's monstrously evil qualities. Especially when McFarlane was drawing him (jesus, I hate McFarlane's "art"). Of course, I quit reading Spidey shortly after McFarlane stopped handling the art, so maybe the character of Brock/Venom got better eventually. Is this the case, is this what I'm missing?

So you didn't see Spidey 2 because it didn't have Venom in it?
Author:  Peeps [ Wed Jul 05, 2006 12:31 pm ]
Post subject: 
***********************Spoiler*********************************
































apparently, sandman is going to be shown to have played a part in probably the most pivotal part of Spiderman (the first movie)
Author:  Al [ Wed Jul 05, 2006 3:15 pm ]
Post subject: 
that's not much of a spoiler


VEMOM FUCKING RULES.

and McFarlane's art in the Spider-Man book was great.
Author:  Peeps [ Wed Jul 05, 2006 3:37 pm ]
Post subject: 
Al wrote:
that's not much of a spoiler


VEMOM FUCKING RULES.

and McFarlane's art in the Spider-Man book was great.


well no its not, but itll be interesting to see how that all ties in. when i saw the pics of the three together i was like wtf, who are they, as they only had their real life names in the captions.
Author:  rich [ Wed Jul 05, 2006 9:29 pm ]
Post subject: 
i think tobey needs to go on a diet .

Image
Author:  SoapMakesUTaller [ Thu Jul 06, 2006 3:41 am ]
Post subject: 
Al wrote:
that's not much of a spoiler


VEMOM FUCKING RULES.

and McFarlane's art in the Spider-Man book was great.


How's this for clarification of Peep's spoiler:


He (Sandman) was part of Uncle Ben's murder in Pt 1....
Page 6 of 26 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/