Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 11:23 pm Posts: 6165 Location: Mass
Orpheus wrote:
Wouldn't not having social commentary make it less pretentious?
No. I don't consider most Gilliam movies pretentious because the commentary is presented in a humble yet hilarious way (ie the paperwork in Brazil). Here we have people fighting inside dreams, and a poorly defined, opium addicted former sideshow owner who has a pet flea that can deliver some sort of syrum that makes people go on a killing spree when triggered by a music box.
Don't get me wrong, I thoguh the imagery was fantastic and I really enjoyed the movie, but I just came out of it wondering what the whole point was. If taken solely as a excercise in set design and cinematography, it was an A+ film, but if there was supposed to be a point to it all, it's not very apparent.
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 11:23 pm Posts: 6165 Location: Mass
Orpheus wrote:
Not all films have points, dude.
Your right.
Perhaps I went into this movie with the wrong fram of mind. Given its absurd, dark plot, epic title, and crazy dystopian setting I expected some visually overwhelming, ostentatious essay about life and soceity. And while it was certainly visually overwhelming and ostentatious, I was looking for a point the whole time, and maybe that's what frustrated me.
If I watched the movie again, and looked at it as a fantastic fairy tale, I think I would enjoy it much more. In fact, looking at it from the perspective, I already like it more. It wasn't what i expected and that's what i didn't like about it. As a fantasy story set in a fantsay land, it works very well.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum