Yes what? Above? Within? Below?
| Red Mosquito http://archive.theskyiscrape.com/ |
|
| RM's nth dating thread http://archive.theskyiscrape.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=93301 |
Page 1 of 15 |
| Author: | Pizza the Hut [ Mon Nov 08, 2010 1:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | RM's nth dating thread |
Do you feel you date above or within your "league?" Hmm? |
|
| Author: | Human Bass [ Mon Nov 08, 2010 1:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rm's 66th dating thread |
Yes, and I like it that way. |
|
| Author: | Pizza the Hut [ Mon Nov 08, 2010 1:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rm's 66th dating thread |
| Yes what? Above? Within? Below? |
|
| Author: | Human Bass [ Mon Nov 08, 2010 1:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rm's 66th dating thread |
Oh, above of course. |
|
| Author: | Kosmicjelli [ Mon Nov 08, 2010 1:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rm's 66th dating thread |
Im an equal opportunity dating type of gal. Ive dated within every strata... Although, atm Im on dating hiatus. |
|
| Author: | Human Bass [ Mon Nov 08, 2010 1:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rm's 66th dating thread |
Wait, by league it is meant wealth or beauty/hotness ? |
|
| Author: | Pizza the Hut [ Mon Nov 08, 2010 1:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rm's 66th dating thread |
Um I guess overall? |
|
| Author: | Human Bass [ Mon Nov 08, 2010 1:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rm's 66th dating thread |
Wealth wise, I really don't care, unless she is an extremely poor girl, since it would be awkward i won't deny. When it comes to beauty, I guess most men want to feel underseving and lucky to be with a woman he finds beautiful. |
|
| Author: | lennytheweedwhacker [ Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rm's 66th dating thread |
|
|
| Author: | Alex [ Mon Nov 08, 2010 3:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rm's 66th dating thread |
lennytheweedwhacker wrote: :?: 
|
|
| Author: | lennytheweedwhacker [ Mon Nov 08, 2010 3:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rm's 66th dating thread |
Alex wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: :?: You didn't answer the question, Stephen. |
|
| Author: | Peeps [ Mon Nov 08, 2010 3:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rm's 66th dating thread |
id date lenny but its soooo obvious i am way above his league |
|
| Author: | Alex [ Mon Nov 08, 2010 3:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rm's 66th dating thread |
lennytheweedwhacker wrote: Alex wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: :?: You didn't answer the question, Stephen. i typically date in the middle to upper quadrant of my league. in baseball terms, i'd consider my "league" (for purposes of this metaphor, we will call it a "division") to be the 2010 NL West, in which i am the San Diego Padres. |
|
| Author: | lennytheweedwhacker [ Mon Nov 08, 2010 3:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rm's 66th dating thread |
Alex wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: Alex wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: :?: You didn't answer the question, Stephen. i typically date in the middle to upper quadrant of my league. in baseball terms, i'd consider my "league" (for purposes of this metaphor, we will call it a "division") to be the 2010 NL West, in which i am the San Diego Padres. I bet you're a real smooth talker with the ladies. Teach me. |
|
| Author: | Alex [ Mon Nov 08, 2010 3:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rm's 66th dating thread |
lennytheweedwhacker wrote: Alex wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: Alex wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: :?: You didn't answer the question, Stephen. i typically date in the middle to upper quadrant of my league. in baseball terms, i'd consider my "league" (for purposes of this metaphor, we will call it a "division") to be the 2010 NL West, in which i am the San Diego Padres. I bet you're a real smooth talker with the ladies. Teach me. i open with a failsafe, usually a handy summation of the history of the medical community's discussion of bioethical implications in the performance of frontal lobotomies. |
|
| Author: | Doug RR [ Mon Nov 08, 2010 3:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rm's 66th dating thread |
before I got married, I dated all kinds mostly just for sex |
|
| Author: | lennytheweedwhacker [ Mon Nov 08, 2010 4:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rm's 66th dating thread |
Alex wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: Alex wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: Alex wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: :?: You didn't answer the question, Stephen. i typically date in the middle to upper quadrant of my league. in baseball terms, i'd consider my "league" (for purposes of this metaphor, we will call it a "division") to be the 2010 NL West, in which i am the San Diego Padres. I bet you're a real smooth talker with the ladies. Teach me. i open with a failsafe, usually a handy summation of the history of the medical community's discussion of bioethical implications in the performance of frontal lobotomies. Why do I even bother? 
|
|
| Author: | theplatypus [ Mon Nov 08, 2010 4:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rm's 66th dating thread |
Always aim upwards. It's a fast business and there is no time for milk. |
|
| Author: | Alex [ Mon Nov 08, 2010 4:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rm's 66th dating thread |
lennytheweedwhacker wrote: Alex wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: Alex wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: Alex wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: :?: You didn't answer the question, Stephen. i typically date in the middle to upper quadrant of my league. in baseball terms, i'd consider my "league" (for purposes of this metaphor, we will call it a "division") to be the 2010 NL West, in which i am the San Diego Padres. I bet you're a real smooth talker with the ladies. Teach me. i open with a failsafe, usually a handy summation of the history of the medical community's discussion of bioethical implications in the performance of frontal lobotomies. Why do I even bother? be yourself, david. unless you are somebody that women don't want. in that case, be veddar10. |
|
| Author: | lennytheweedwhacker [ Mon Nov 08, 2010 4:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rm's 66th dating thread |
Alex wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: Alex wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: Alex wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: Alex wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: :?: You didn't answer the question, Stephen. i typically date in the middle to upper quadrant of my league. in baseball terms, i'd consider my "league" (for purposes of this metaphor, we will call it a "division") to be the 2010 NL West, in which i am the San Diego Padres. I bet you're a real smooth talker with the ladies. Teach me. i open with a failsafe, usually a handy summation of the history of the medical community's discussion of bioethical implications in the performance of frontal lobotomies. Why do I even bother? be yourself, david. unless you are somebody that women don't want. in that case, be veddar10. I bet he just wills picture from hotties and they instantaneously arrive on his cellular. |
|
| Page 1 of 15 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|