Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 9:46 pm Posts: 2275 Location: Round on the outside hi in the middle Gender: Male
ThumbingMyWayToNFLD wrote:
I just realized two things from this video:
1) This is exactly why I can't jerk off to photos anymore. They just can't be trusted.
2) I really need to upgrade my Photoshop version.
Since you are "photoshop" (sorry, I know you dont like being called that), do you think that you could pull off something like this? I mean, that is pretty amazing...it blows my mind.
_________________ In a world that grows closer because of technology, religion continues to seperate and divide
Joined: Mon May 30, 2005 4:47 pm Posts: 3677 Location: Newfoundland Gender: Male
PJ10alive41 wrote:
ThumbingMyWayToNFLD wrote:
I just realized two things from this video:
1) This is exactly why I can't jerk off to photos anymore. They just can't be trusted.
2) I really need to upgrade my Photoshop version.
Since you are "photoshop" (sorry, I know you dont like being called that), do you think that you could pull off something like this? I mean, that is pretty amazing...it blows my mind.
I honestly wish I could. I don't even know where to start. Hell, I tried using the smudge tool (something I assume was used frequently in that vid) to cover up a scar on my arm and ended up starting the whole "Photoshop" thing as a result, so I obviously have no place attempting anything of that magnitude. That guy must have some serious patience as I can't imagine that job taking any less than an hour.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:56 pm Posts: 19957 Location: Jenny Lewis' funbags
That person probably does that same job 20 times a day - so with that repitition comes speed. What he/she is doing isn't overly complex, in fact only a few different techniques were used as far as i could tell. The main one is the "liquify" tool. The majority of the body shrinking/shaping was done with that tool. Besides that they just painted on some hair and blurred it to make it look real, and smoothed out some of the imperfections on her skin. After that they adjusted the lighting and voila!
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 5:09 pm Posts: 10478 Location: Pittsburgh Gender: Male
MF wrote:
That person probably does that same job 20 times a day - so with that repitition comes speed. What he/she is doing isn't overly complex, in fact only a few different techniques were used as far as i could tell. The main one is the "liquify" tool. The majority of the body shrinking/shaping was done with that tool. Besides that they just painted on some hair and blurred it to make it look real, and smoothed out some of the imperfections on her skin. After that they adjusted the lighting and voila!
Mike, I wanna see you try it. Come on pal, I know you can do it.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:43 pm Posts: 7633 Location: Philly Del Fia Gender: Female
It kinda bugs me when these things come out, though, because the vast majority of models are **NOT** 'shopped this much. For the girls who take it seriously, take care of themselves, work out, and work really hard to look their best, it's kind of a slap in the face.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:43 pm Posts: 7633 Location: Philly Del Fia Gender: Female
MF wrote:
i think it's more of an example of how people shouldn't accept everything they see at face value.
Okay, I'll accept that. But they shouldn't accept these "we made this fat chick look hot" things at face value either, which a lot of people seem very apt to do.
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 9:46 pm Posts: 2275 Location: Round on the outside hi in the middle Gender: Male
NaiveAndTrue wrote:
MF wrote:
i think it's more of an example of how people shouldn't accept everything they see at face value.
Okay, I'll accept that. But they shouldn't accept these "we made this fat chick look hot" things at face value either, which a lot of people seem very apt to do.
It's not about making a fat chick skinny, its about how fucking cool it was. I know models are photoshoped to some degree, but this is obviously an exteremely exagerated example.
_________________ In a world that grows closer because of technology, religion continues to seperate and divide
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 5:09 pm Posts: 10478 Location: Pittsburgh Gender: Male
PJ10alive41 wrote:
NaiveAndTrue wrote:
MF wrote:
i think it's more of an example of how people shouldn't accept everything they see at face value.
Okay, I'll accept that. But they shouldn't accept these "we made this fat chick look hot" things at face value either, which a lot of people seem very apt to do.
It's not about making a fat chick skinny, its about how fucking cool it was. I know models are photoshoped to some degree, but this is obviously an exteremely exagerated example.
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 9:46 pm Posts: 2275 Location: Round on the outside hi in the middle Gender: Male
NOTHINGFAN wrote:
PJ10alive41 wrote:
NaiveAndTrue wrote:
MF wrote:
i think it's more of an example of how people shouldn't accept everything they see at face value.
Okay, I'll accept that. But they shouldn't accept these "we made this fat chick look hot" things at face value either, which a lot of people seem very apt to do.
It's not about making a fat chick skinny, its about how fucking cool it was. I know models are photoshoped to some degree, but this is obviously an exteremely exagerated example.
I like the bottom line in your signature.
_________________ In a world that grows closer because of technology, religion continues to seperate and divide
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:43 pm Posts: 7633 Location: Philly Del Fia Gender: Female
PJ10alive41 wrote:
NaiveAndTrue wrote:
MF wrote:
i think it's more of an example of how people shouldn't accept everything they see at face value.
Okay, I'll accept that. But they shouldn't accept these "we made this fat chick look hot" things at face value either, which a lot of people seem very apt to do.
It's not about making a fat chick skinny, its about how fucking cool it was. I know models are photoshoped to some degree, but this is obviously an exteremely exagerated example.
Oh, I'm not doubting it's cool as hell. I wish my friggin laptop have enough memory to run my copy of photoshop.
It's not about making a fat chick skinny, its about how fucking cool it was. I know models are photoshoped to some degree, but this is obviously an exteremely exagerated example.
I'm trying to find the cover of this week's Time magazine with Hillary Clinton on the front. That shot was photoshopped all to heck.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
Before
