I think I've figured out what differentiates a good poster and a bad poster. A good poster is someone who has a real life and so doesn't really care about what happens on the internet. This person may make friends here but doesn't really care if he or she does, mostly posts here out of boredom, and at any time could leave the board and not really care.

A bad poster is someone who doesn't really have a real life and who takes RM relationships seriously, even though it's just text. These are the people who kinda need RM to connect to other people. The problem is that they don't bring anything interesting from the outside to the board.

This is what I think. What do YOU GUYS think?

OH SHIT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT ME!!!!!!!!!!!!! UH OH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

hmmm i concur with parts of your theorum here however I cannot pass judgement as i have been accused of being the worst poster on the board before.

Actually I'm not. It's really a general theory that just so happens to fit why I don't like you. Here, look at PJ Chat. Why does that place suck? Because they don't bring anything outside in. They all just sit there on the internet talking about Pearl Jam.

i think thats the point though...
otherwise i suppose sharts are as good a topic as any...whadda ya think nads?

since when do you not like me? i thought we were buds

and sharts are a biological topic which is indeed fascinating thankyou Eric

Hmm, you're right, maybe PJ Chat isn't a good example, this more or less applies to GD. And I'm not sure it's bulletproof, because Section411 was a bad poster, but he also clearly did shit outside of the internet. And then there's ceebs, who spends all his time on here, but is also a good poster. But then again, Section411 was entertaining so maybe he was a good poster, and ceebs does do all that philosophy shit.

I wasn't referring to you, I was referring to Chuck.

whoops my self indulgence was hanging out a little there

uh oh, you contradicted what you said!!! so which is it??

man, you are such a terrible poster

so if you are too good for this place then you are the best at it is that what you are saying

How? She thought that



was in reference to her, when actually it's in reference to your post. You helped shape this theory, that's for sure, but it's not specifically calling you out. It's a general theory that you fit into.

you need to come up with something new

Why? Because some kid in NC doesn't like it? I'm still entertained.

actually, a majority of the board doesn't seem to agree with your "OMG YOU'RE CREEPY/A BAD POSTER PMA" shtick, at least over the past few days.

I mean, kinda. The ones who need this place, they're too scared to make a funny post.

Oh right, because I take my cues from what everyone else thinks.

but if the last fews days has highlighted anything it is the fact that being mean to people on the internet isn't funny or entertaining