Board index » Word on the Street... » General Discussion




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 373 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: thodoks contemplates a new wardrobe
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:08 am 
Offline
User avatar
Spacegirl
 Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:54 pm
Posts: 40914
ankle exposure is out of the question for your climate, canuck.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: thodoks contemplates a new wardrobe
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:08 am 
Offline
User avatar
statistically insignificant
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:19 pm
Posts: 25134
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
a gay confirmed to me that highwaters are not acceptable

then the question still stands: what length of pant is most acceptable?

i think pants that only show a bit of your ankle when you sit

so we want a pant that won't obscure the heel of a finely crafted shoe?

_________________
Fortuna69 wrote:
I will continue to not understand


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: thodoks contemplates a new wardrobe
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:11 am 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 12:10 am
Posts: 10993
Gender: Male
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
a gay confirmed to me that highwaters are not acceptable

then the question still stands: what length of pant is most acceptable?

i think pants that only show a bit of your ankle when you sit

so we want a pant that won't obscure the heel of a finely crafted shoe?

ideally, but that might take some minimal rolling of the cuffs, depending on the brand. i wear 32 length--30s are too short, and 31s would be most ideal, but those are unicorns of pants.

_________________
i8pork wrote:
being on the internet is fun as hell. :comp:


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: thodoks contemplates a new wardrobe
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:12 am 
Offline
User avatar
statistically insignificant
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:19 pm
Posts: 25134
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
a gay confirmed to me that highwaters are not acceptable

then the question still stands: what length of pant is most acceptable?

i think pants that only show a bit of your ankle when you sit

so we want a pant that won't obscure the heel of a finely crafted shoe?

ideally, but that might take some minimal rolling of the cuffs, depending on the brand. i wear 32 length--30s are too short, and 31s would be most ideal, but those are unicorns of pants.

i have half a mind to fly to asia to economically indulge my tailored pant fetish

_________________
Fortuna69 wrote:
I will continue to not understand


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: thodoks contemplates a new wardrobe
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:14 am 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 12:10 am
Posts: 10993
Gender: Male
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
a gay confirmed to me that highwaters are not acceptable

then the question still stands: what length of pant is most acceptable?

i think pants that only show a bit of your ankle when you sit

so we want a pant that won't obscure the heel of a finely crafted shoe?

ideally, but that might take some minimal rolling of the cuffs, depending on the brand. i wear 32 length--30s are too short, and 31s would be most ideal, but those are unicorns of pants.

i have half a mind to fly to asia to economically indulge my tailored pant fetish

given2trade seems like the kind of guy who can give you advice on how to indulge fetishes in asia

_________________
i8pork wrote:
being on the internet is fun as hell. :comp:


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: thodoks contemplates a new wardrobe
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:16 am 
Offline
User avatar
statistically insignificant
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:19 pm
Posts: 25134
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
a gay confirmed to me that highwaters are not acceptable

then the question still stands: what length of pant is most acceptable?

i think pants that only show a bit of your ankle when you sit

so we want a pant that won't obscure the heel of a finely crafted shoe?

ideally, but that might take some minimal rolling of the cuffs, depending on the brand. i wear 32 length--30s are too short, and 31s would be most ideal, but those are unicorns of pants.

i have half a mind to fly to asia to economically indulge my tailored pant fetish

given2trade seems like the kind of guy who can give you advice on how to indulge fetishes in asia

do you peg him as a crew-neck or v-neck undershirt wearer?

_________________
Fortuna69 wrote:
I will continue to not understand


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: thodoks contemplates a new wardrobe
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:18 am 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 12:10 am
Posts: 10993
Gender: Male
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
a gay confirmed to me that highwaters are not acceptable

then the question still stands: what length of pant is most acceptable?

i think pants that only show a bit of your ankle when you sit

so we want a pant that won't obscure the heel of a finely crafted shoe?

ideally, but that might take some minimal rolling of the cuffs, depending on the brand. i wear 32 length--30s are too short, and 31s would be most ideal, but those are unicorns of pants.

i have half a mind to fly to asia to economically indulge my tailored pant fetish

given2trade seems like the kind of guy who can give you advice on how to indulge fetishes in asia

do you peg him as a crew-neck or v-neck undershirt wearer?

i see him as a crew-neck undershirter. why buy a shirt if no one can see it?

_________________
i8pork wrote:
being on the internet is fun as hell. :comp:


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: thodoks contemplates a new wardrobe
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:18 am 
Offline
User avatar
statistically insignificant
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:19 pm
Posts: 25134
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
a gay confirmed to me that highwaters are not acceptable

then the question still stands: what length of pant is most acceptable?

i think pants that only show a bit of your ankle when you sit

so we want a pant that won't obscure the heel of a finely crafted shoe?

ideally, but that might take some minimal rolling of the cuffs, depending on the brand. i wear 32 length--30s are too short, and 31s would be most ideal, but those are unicorns of pants.

i have half a mind to fly to asia to economically indulge my tailored pant fetish

given2trade seems like the kind of guy who can give you advice on how to indulge fetishes in asia

do you peg him as a crew-neck or v-neck undershirt wearer?

i see him as a crew-neck undershirter. why buy a shirt if no one can see it?

and you?

_________________
Fortuna69 wrote:
I will continue to not understand


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: thodoks contemplates a new wardrobe
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:20 am 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 12:10 am
Posts: 10993
Gender: Male
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
a gay confirmed to me that highwaters are not acceptable

then the question still stands: what length of pant is most acceptable?

i think pants that only show a bit of your ankle when you sit

so we want a pant that won't obscure the heel of a finely crafted shoe?

ideally, but that might take some minimal rolling of the cuffs, depending on the brand. i wear 32 length--30s are too short, and 31s would be most ideal, but those are unicorns of pants.

i have half a mind to fly to asia to economically indulge my tailored pant fetish

given2trade seems like the kind of guy who can give you advice on how to indulge fetishes in asia

do you peg him as a crew-neck or v-neck undershirt wearer?

i see him as a crew-neck undershirter. why buy a shirt if no one can see it?

and you?

most of my undershirts are crew necks, but i'm a v-necker when it comes to overshirts, including sweaters and long-sleeve tees. but my heart lies with the henleys. you?

_________________
i8pork wrote:
being on the internet is fun as hell. :comp:


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: thodoks contemplates a new wardrobe
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:20 am 
Offline
User avatar
Got Some
 Profile

Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 1:37 am
Posts: 2465
Location: A dark place
Alex wrote:
unicorns of pants.

There are unicorns aplenty wandering the Wranlger aisles of Wal-Mart.

_________________
Do you like crappy amateur photography? Check out my photo blog here.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: thodoks contemplates a new wardrobe
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:21 am 
Offline
User avatar
statistically insignificant
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:19 pm
Posts: 25134
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
a gay confirmed to me that highwaters are not acceptable

then the question still stands: what length of pant is most acceptable?

i think pants that only show a bit of your ankle when you sit

so we want a pant that won't obscure the heel of a finely crafted shoe?

ideally, but that might take some minimal rolling of the cuffs, depending on the brand. i wear 32 length--30s are too short, and 31s would be most ideal, but those are unicorns of pants.

i have half a mind to fly to asia to economically indulge my tailored pant fetish

given2trade seems like the kind of guy who can give you advice on how to indulge fetishes in asia

do you peg him as a crew-neck or v-neck undershirt wearer?

i see him as a crew-neck undershirter. why buy a shirt if no one can see it?

and you?

most of my undershirts are crew necks, but i'm a v-necker when it comes to overshirts, including sweaters and long-sleeve tees. but my heart lies with the henleys. you?

i long ago jettisoned my crew neck swag

_________________
Fortuna69 wrote:
I will continue to not understand


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: thodoks contemplates a new wardrobe
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:22 am 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 12:10 am
Posts: 10993
Gender: Male
turned2black wrote:
Alex wrote:
unicorns of pants.

There are unicorns aplenty wandering the Wranlger aisles of Wal-Mart.

i buy my underwear there sometimes

_________________
i8pork wrote:
being on the internet is fun as hell. :comp:


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: thodoks contemplates a new wardrobe
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:23 am 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 12:10 am
Posts: 10993
Gender: Male
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
a gay confirmed to me that highwaters are not acceptable

then the question still stands: what length of pant is most acceptable?

i think pants that only show a bit of your ankle when you sit

so we want a pant that won't obscure the heel of a finely crafted shoe?

ideally, but that might take some minimal rolling of the cuffs, depending on the brand. i wear 32 length--30s are too short, and 31s would be most ideal, but those are unicorns of pants.

i have half a mind to fly to asia to economically indulge my tailored pant fetish

given2trade seems like the kind of guy who can give you advice on how to indulge fetishes in asia

do you peg him as a crew-neck or v-neck undershirt wearer?

i see him as a crew-neck undershirter. why buy a shirt if no one can see it?

and you?

most of my undershirts are crew necks, but i'm a v-necker when it comes to overshirts, including sweaters and long-sleeve tees. but my heart lies with the henleys. you?

i long ago jettisoned my crew neck swag

did you have a would-be hand-me-down bonfire?

_________________
i8pork wrote:
being on the internet is fun as hell. :comp:


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: thodoks contemplates a new wardrobe
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:26 am 
Offline
User avatar
statistically insignificant
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:19 pm
Posts: 25134
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
a gay confirmed to me that highwaters are not acceptable

then the question still stands: what length of pant is most acceptable?

i think pants that only show a bit of your ankle when you sit

so we want a pant that won't obscure the heel of a finely crafted shoe?

ideally, but that might take some minimal rolling of the cuffs, depending on the brand. i wear 32 length--30s are too short, and 31s would be most ideal, but those are unicorns of pants.

i have half a mind to fly to asia to economically indulge my tailored pant fetish

given2trade seems like the kind of guy who can give you advice on how to indulge fetishes in asia

do you peg him as a crew-neck or v-neck undershirt wearer?

i see him as a crew-neck undershirter. why buy a shirt if no one can see it?

and you?

most of my undershirts are crew necks, but i'm a v-necker when it comes to overshirts, including sweaters and long-sleeve tees. but my heart lies with the henleys. you?

i long ago jettisoned my crew neck swag

did you have a would-be hand-me-down bonfire?

its embers still glow in my heart

_________________
Fortuna69 wrote:
I will continue to not understand


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: thodoks contemplates a new wardrobe
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:30 am 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 12:10 am
Posts: 10993
Gender: Male
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
a gay confirmed to me that highwaters are not acceptable

then the question still stands: what length of pant is most acceptable?

i think pants that only show a bit of your ankle when you sit

so we want a pant that won't obscure the heel of a finely crafted shoe?

ideally, but that might take some minimal rolling of the cuffs, depending on the brand. i wear 32 length--30s are too short, and 31s would be most ideal, but those are unicorns of pants.

i have half a mind to fly to asia to economically indulge my tailored pant fetish

given2trade seems like the kind of guy who can give you advice on how to indulge fetishes in asia

do you peg him as a crew-neck or v-neck undershirt wearer?

i see him as a crew-neck undershirter. why buy a shirt if no one can see it?

and you?

most of my undershirts are crew necks, but i'm a v-necker when it comes to overshirts, including sweaters and long-sleeve tees. but my heart lies with the henleys. you?

i long ago jettisoned my crew neck swag

did you have a would-be hand-me-down bonfire?

its embers still glow in my heart

how do you feel about cardigans?

_________________
i8pork wrote:
being on the internet is fun as hell. :comp:


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: thodoks contemplates a new wardrobe
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:31 am 
Offline
User avatar
statistically insignificant
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:19 pm
Posts: 25134
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
a gay confirmed to me that highwaters are not acceptable

then the question still stands: what length of pant is most acceptable?

i think pants that only show a bit of your ankle when you sit

so we want a pant that won't obscure the heel of a finely crafted shoe?

ideally, but that might take some minimal rolling of the cuffs, depending on the brand. i wear 32 length--30s are too short, and 31s would be most ideal, but those are unicorns of pants.

i have half a mind to fly to asia to economically indulge my tailored pant fetish

given2trade seems like the kind of guy who can give you advice on how to indulge fetishes in asia

do you peg him as a crew-neck or v-neck undershirt wearer?

i see him as a crew-neck undershirter. why buy a shirt if no one can see it?

and you?

most of my undershirts are crew necks, but i'm a v-necker when it comes to overshirts, including sweaters and long-sleeve tees. but my heart lies with the henleys. you?

i long ago jettisoned my crew neck swag

did you have a would-be hand-me-down bonfire?

its embers still glow in my heart

how do you feel about cardigans?

those are a no-go

_________________
Fortuna69 wrote:
I will continue to not understand


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: thodoks contemplates a new wardrobe
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:33 am 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 12:10 am
Posts: 10993
Gender: Male
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
a gay confirmed to me that highwaters are not acceptable

then the question still stands: what length of pant is most acceptable?

i think pants that only show a bit of your ankle when you sit

so we want a pant that won't obscure the heel of a finely crafted shoe?

ideally, but that might take some minimal rolling of the cuffs, depending on the brand. i wear 32 length--30s are too short, and 31s would be most ideal, but those are unicorns of pants.

i have half a mind to fly to asia to economically indulge my tailored pant fetish

given2trade seems like the kind of guy who can give you advice on how to indulge fetishes in asia

do you peg him as a crew-neck or v-neck undershirt wearer?

i see him as a crew-neck undershirter. why buy a shirt if no one can see it?

and you?

most of my undershirts are crew necks, but i'm a v-necker when it comes to overshirts, including sweaters and long-sleeve tees. but my heart lies with the henleys. you?

i long ago jettisoned my crew neck swag

did you have a would-be hand-me-down bonfire?

its embers still glow in my heart

how do you feel about cardigans?

those are a no-go

they are a big part of the preppy asshole aesthetic i'm trying to cultivate

_________________
i8pork wrote:
being on the internet is fun as hell. :comp:


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: thodoks contemplates a new wardrobe
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:34 am 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 12:10 am
Posts: 10993
Gender: Male
i'm going for andy bernard-meets-tom haverford-meets-patrick bateman

_________________
i8pork wrote:
being on the internet is fun as hell. :comp:


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: thodoks contemplates a new wardrobe
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:35 am 
Offline
User avatar
statistically insignificant
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:19 pm
Posts: 25134
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
Alex wrote:
a gay confirmed to me that highwaters are not acceptable

then the question still stands: what length of pant is most acceptable?

i think pants that only show a bit of your ankle when you sit

so we want a pant that won't obscure the heel of a finely crafted shoe?

ideally, but that might take some minimal rolling of the cuffs, depending on the brand. i wear 32 length--30s are too short, and 31s would be most ideal, but those are unicorns of pants.

i have half a mind to fly to asia to economically indulge my tailored pant fetish

given2trade seems like the kind of guy who can give you advice on how to indulge fetishes in asia

do you peg him as a crew-neck or v-neck undershirt wearer?

i see him as a crew-neck undershirter. why buy a shirt if no one can see it?

and you?

most of my undershirts are crew necks, but i'm a v-necker when it comes to overshirts, including sweaters and long-sleeve tees. but my heart lies with the henleys. you?

i long ago jettisoned my crew neck swag

did you have a would-be hand-me-down bonfire?

its embers still glow in my heart

how do you feel about cardigans?

those are a no-go

they are a big part of the preppy asshole aesthetic i'm trying to cultivate

they undermine much of the masculinity i'm trying to fake

_________________
Fortuna69 wrote:
I will continue to not understand


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: thodoks contemplates a new wardrobe
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:36 am 
Offline
User avatar
statistically insignificant
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:19 pm
Posts: 25134
i'm attempting to cultivate an aesthetic cut from the decidedly alpha gosling-cum-hamilton leithauser cloth

_________________
Fortuna69 wrote:
I will continue to not understand


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 373 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19  Next

Board index » Word on the Street... » General Discussion


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 8:51 pm