i think i've decided that my next musical project will be the beastie boys
thodoks wrote:
i have since reconsidered
Alex wrote:
yeah that sounds about right
thodoks wrote:
oh i'm not opposed to venturing into beastie boys' territory; it's just that i've got other non-music projects/interests that are a higher priority i'm sure i'll get there eventually
Alex wrote:
what 'je ne sais quoi' do these fellers have that other rappers don't?
thodoks wrote:
i don't know enough about them to capably answer, but my favorite artists in the hip-hop genre tend to employ a fair bit of whimsy
Alex wrote:
who are some of your faves?
thodoks wrote:
the wu-tang clan, outkast, LFO
Alex wrote:
i would suggest de la soul as a candidate for your further study. while they do not attain the dizzying lyrical heights of LFO, they are nonetheless a clever bunch.
thodoks wrote:
i basically know very little of the rap game, and i feel as though my music bona fides would be enhanced by enlarging my aural ambit
Alex wrote:
your high tolerance for misogyny will not impede your journey through the rap annals
thodoks wrote:
i'm flirting with that threshold where tolerance becomes endorsement
Alex wrote:
in that case, you're ready to go straight for the hard stuff: go with snoop dogg's "doggystyle" album
thodoks wrote:
i still have that album, along with the chronic, an album by nate g, and various other early/mid-90s softer joints like jodeci, silk, etc
Alex wrote:
by nate g, do you mean warren g, nate dogg, or our very own orpheus?
thodoks wrote:
i don't know...the "regulator" guy
Alex wrote:
that applies equally to warren g and orpheus, but then again what doesn't
thodoks wrote:
all jesting aside, provide for me an optimal order in which i should acquaint myself with the beastie boys work
Alex wrote:
1. Paul's Boutique 2. Ill Communication 3. Check Your Head 4. Hello Nasty 5. Hot Sauce Committee Part 2 6. To The 5 Boroughs 7. Licensed to Ill 8. The Mix-Up
thodoks wrote:
i don't really like the "you've gotta fight for your right to party" kind of nonsense. what little i've heard from their later stuff seems much more interesting and more intelligently composed...does your list reflect this evolution, bro?
Alex wrote:
yeah, mostly. "fight for your right" was on Licensed to Ill, their debut. Paul's Boutique was their second album, so there's a bit of the brashness present there, but it's diminished. Boutique stands as a landmark in hip-hop as (arguably) the first album to perfect the sampling technique. Licensed to Ill is really the Beasties equivalent of Ten. probably their most famous album but not a good representation of their style. the "frat rap" style was mostly attributable to the influence of a producer who helped shaped the album, not due to the Beasties themselves. the most stylistically varied albums are clustered at the top of the list, with the exception of Boutique. it's innovative and adventurous, but it's strictly hip-hop. it's worth noting that The Mix-Up is an instrumental album--no singing, no rapping, just the Beasties playing their weird brand of funk. i prefer the rapping Beasties to the funk-rock-playing Beasties, but you might feel otherwise.
thodoks wrote:
interesting, thank you for being a beacon in these dark times
Alex wrote:
i'm considering beaconing full-time
thodoks wrote:
in an ironic twist, i'm moonlighting as a beacon
Alex wrote:
beats the hell out of deaconing
thodoks wrote:
i've yet to provide RM with a suitable tithe
Alex wrote:
is RM the quintessential free rider program?
thodoks wrote:
i'm writing my summer paper on the externalities imposed by the dkfan9 account on the entirety of this e-community
Alex wrote:
i wonder if he ever suffers from inflammation asymmetry
thodoks wrote:
i'd nominate him for chairman of the board's whey and means committee
Alex wrote:
dkfan9 inflicts us all with a case of splendor euphoria
thodoks wrote:
can you imagine having to live in ohio
Alex wrote:
i mean, it would kind of be a step up for me
thodoks wrote:
i find it hard to believe that a louisville or lexington is worse than a columbus or a cleveland we drove through columbus on our way from philly to KC and, wow, what an absolute shithole...applebee's, kohl's, and sundry lower/middle class detritus as far as the eye could see
Alex wrote:
i just don't appreciate the "southern" aspects of culture enough to fully appreciate the area. lexington is too small to really be compared to the other cities. louisville's actually pretty goodl, overall, and it's no coincidence that most kentuckians consider it more midwestern than southern.
thodoks wrote:
there are certain aspects of southern culture that i truly miss (hospitality, cuisine, etc), and others that i hope to never again revisit (aesthetic homogenization, religious zealotry, etc). i will say that my experiences in philly, KC, and elsewhere have shown me that the south - and in particular, poor white southerners - does not have the market cornered on racism i could very gladly reside in a town like nashville, i think
Alex wrote:
i spent a lot of weekends in nashvlle in college and found it rather enjoyable. a vibrant downtown--not something very common in southern cities. how does the pacific northwest stack up overall against the other regions you've experienced?
thodoks wrote:
vancouver: too expensive, lots of residential/commercial homogeneity, lots of groupthink (not unique to the region, of course), interesting mix of genuine hospitality and "too cool to converse with you" douchebaggery, very little distinct culture (melting pot effect), too few dive bars and places to revel on the cheap, amazing public transit and natural beauty, lots of very interesting people seattle: too expensive, lots of distinct neighborhoods with unique vibes, very heterogeneous residential/commercial places, shitty roads, much more culture than vancouver i much prefer seattle to vancouver
Alex wrote:
i bet the shadow of huntsville hangs over these cities like nah over a huddle house waitress
thodoks wrote:
surprisingly, huntsville lacks indigenous cuisine
Alex wrote:
did you ever consort with its indigenous population?
thodoks wrote:
i mean, i did have an unfortunate wide-wale corduroy phase. so yeah
Alex wrote:
when you lived there, did you ever sense that there was a lonesome, wide-set-eyed boy with a door surplus daydreaming under that same huntsville sky?
thodoks wrote:
i was too busy plying po*n to think about that
Alex wrote:
what a world of difference between an "o" and an "r"
dkfan9's pontifications are the dingleberries of the internet's hindparts
thodoks wrote:
i am officially offended by his abuse of all things parenthetical
Alex wrote:
but bro can pull off a sombrero
thodoks wrote:
i wish i was so clever as to don a sombrero on cinco de mayo
Alex wrote:
such things happen when acne takes on a personage
thodoks wrote:
i read somewhere that enterprise car rental employs more political science majors than any other company employs any other particular major
Alex wrote:
can a blogger truly be confined by the company name on his or her paycheck?
thodoks wrote:
i guess it adds some street cred, amping up those proletariat bona fides
Alex wrote:
i was in that iconoclast's city on new year's eve and didn't even think to say hello
thodoks wrote:
which iconoclast would that be? adam yauch?
Alex wrote:
pat wright (cincinnati)
thodoks wrote:
i long to hear your impressions
Alex wrote:
i don't have very strong impressions of cincinnati. my time there has been limited to a bengals game, a couple of reds games, and the aforementioned (hazy) new year's eve. i had some delightful pizza at a place called A Tavola, patronized a couple of divey bars with decent craft beer selections, and had a few lunches at hole-in-the wall sandwich shops within walking distance of the stadia. it's not the kind of place that will inspire poetry.
thodoks wrote:
but will it inspire faux-etry?
Alex wrote:
pat, but right
thodoks wrote:
sombre(b)ro
Alex wrote:
what did RM do to deserve dkfan9?
thodoks wrote:
we failed to run our whey flag up the nuance staff with sufficient zeal
Alex wrote:
luckily for us, for every dkfan9 there is a mystyle185 and a theodore bundy
thodoks wrote:
who is responsible for the theodore bundy account? it is easily my favorite second account
Alex wrote:
i have no idea, but i bet if you started a thread asking that very question you'd get a lot of great leads.
thodoks wrote:
it's withoutrings i bet
Alex wrote:
our mercurial shadow trader does have a penchant for mischief
thodoks wrote:
it's a level 7 account, and it mostly contributes level 7 posts. RM's sudden dearth of level-7 posters leads me to believe it has to be one of a select few. the theodore bundy leitmotif is right up the withoutrings account's alley but i have been wrong on no fewer than dozens of occasions in the past, so it's not clear that this isn't another one of those times
Alex wrote:
i am an unlucky man to count on only one hand the number of level-7 posters on RM
thodoks wrote:
the absence of the spike and nah accounts is most pronounced
Alex wrote:
nah achieves his singular purpose with utmost proficiency but lacks the multi-dimensionality to be a 7-er, in my humble opinion.
thodoks wrote:
i just rounded that level-5er up is all
Alex wrote:
what level is our dear boy lenny
thodoks wrote:
levels are an insufficient metric to capture everything that the lennytheweedwhacker account encompasses
Alex wrote:
the answer saddens me too friend
thodoks wrote:
i would pay good money to attend a "lenny camp"
Alex wrote:
i bet that documentary would have the pace of 2001: A Space Odyssey and the moral overtones of Left Behind
thodoks wrote:
what kind of currency do you suppose the fine folks at camp weedwhacker would accept?
Alex wrote:
dolors
thodoks wrote:
well done
Alex wrote:
?/10
thodoks wrote:
∞
Alex wrote:
thodoks wrote:
let's put together an "RM camp" for the wayward tig accounts of the world
Alex wrote:
i've been trying a "show, don't tell" approach with that very goal in mind for months now
thodoks wrote:
it might be time to adopt a "tell, and then tell again" approach
Alex wrote:
maybe that RM camp could essentially be a thread in which our PM conversations are posted in their entireties
thodoks wrote:
a true rapture
Alex wrote:
so i'm thinking i'll post this PM conversation in GD, starting with your post about the beastie boys, as a long string of quotes. do i have your permission?
I assumed this was some strange new approach B was taking to off topic thread splitting til the true origins of this My Dinner With Andre-esque back and forth were revealed in the OP's coda.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum