Red Mosquito
http://archive.theskyiscrape.com/

The 2003 tour would have been better if Eddie had long hair
http://archive.theskyiscrape.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=62027
Page 1 of 2

Author:  Farmer John [ Tue Mar 13, 2007 3:58 am ]
Post subject:  The 2003 tour would have been better if Eddie had long hair

:lol:

That's right...you know you agree with me.

Author:  Monkey_Driven [ Tue Mar 13, 2007 5:22 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The 2003 tour would have been better if Eddie had long h

Farmer John wrote:
:lol:

That's right...you know you agree with me.


It always takes me a while to get used to it when I watch DVD's of the '03 tour. I guess I'm a nerd.

Author:  tommyphillips [ Tue Mar 13, 2007 5:29 am ]
Post subject: 

your probably right

Author:  whoby#s [ Tue Mar 13, 2007 5:40 am ]
Post subject: 

grow up

Author:  pjnothingman [ Tue Mar 13, 2007 7:57 am ]
Post subject: 

long hair...and maybe some better guitar tones w/distortion

Author:  corduroy_blazer [ Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:00 am ]
Post subject: 

pjnothingman wrote:
maybe some better guitar tones w/distortion

Author:  spenno [ Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:42 am ]
Post subject: 

corduroy_blazer wrote:
pjnothingman wrote:
maybe some better guitar tones w/distortion


+ long hair.

I don't know why it's true, it's just true.

2003: Ed has short hair. Pearl Jam are pretty good.

2005-6: Ed has long hair. Pearl Jam are the best rock band in the universe.

I have short hair. I guess I just don't rock.

Author:  Farmer John [ Tue Mar 13, 2007 1:23 pm ]
Post subject: 

pjnothingman wrote:
long hair...and maybe some better guitar tones w/distortion


I agree. Both Ed and the guitars were too 'clean-cut'.

Author:  stip [ Tue Mar 13, 2007 2:56 pm ]
Post subject: 

Farmer John wrote:
pjnothingman wrote:
long hair...and maybe some better guitar tones w/distortion


I agree. Both Ed and the guitars were too 'clean-cut'.


Stay in school and stay away from drugs kids

Author:  Sunny [ Tue Mar 13, 2007 3:36 pm ]
Post subject: 

hell no. i'm glad he had short hair.

it gave the band more of a "mature" image. eddie really seemed more visually entertaining than 2000...at least you could see his face this time.

it's good that he's experimenting with different images...but for God's sake Eddie.....SHAVE!

Author:  conoalias [ Tue Mar 13, 2007 6:57 pm ]
Post subject: 

:waah:

Author:  regalo [ Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:52 pm ]
Post subject: 

long hair = Good.

I agree. Eddie is better with long hair.

Author:  pjcowgirl [ Thu Mar 15, 2007 2:05 am ]
Post subject:  This thread would have been better if it was at synergy

:lol:

But the frat boy look did accentuate his chipmunk cheeks beautifully

Author:  Sunny [ Thu Mar 15, 2007 2:24 am ]
Post subject: 

*plugs ears with fingers*

LALALALALALALALALALALALA!!

Author:  TW [ Thu Mar 15, 2007 3:16 am ]
Post subject: 

a. gheyest thread ever

b. OP is dead wrong. Short hair is much better. Makes him look younger. This thinning hair is not a cool look. The short hair is a much more dignified look.

Author:  kerrang [ Thu Mar 15, 2007 3:21 am ]
Post subject: 

you all are a bunch of nerds just like Stone.

Author:  corduroy_blazer [ Thu Mar 15, 2007 6:00 am ]
Post subject: 

incorrect.

Author:  conoalias [ Thu Mar 15, 2007 3:39 pm ]
Post subject: 

actually it wouldn't be, because they'd still be touring in support of Riot Act no matter what.

Author:  spenno [ Thu Mar 15, 2007 10:14 pm ]
Post subject: 

conoalias wrote:
actually it wouldn't be, because they'd still be touring in support of Riot Act no matter what.


I guess that really nails it.

Author:  tommyphillips [ Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:34 pm ]
Post subject: 

2003 tour was still good

Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/