Red Mosquito http://archive.theskyiscrape.com/ |
|
The 2003 tour would have been better if Eddie had long hair http://archive.theskyiscrape.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=62027 |
Page 2 of 2 |
Author: | adamdude [ Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
2000 american tour would have been better if eddie had no facial hair. ooh yeah |
Author: | spenno [ Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
adamdude wrote: 2000 american tour would have been better if eddie had no facial hair. ooh yeah
Is that why Europe 2000 was better? But...then, by that logic, 2006 would've sucked too. Bah! |
Author: | SLH916 [ Fri Mar 16, 2007 6:19 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Is there something about the way he has been trimming it? He is starting to look like a beard wearing a man rather than a man wearing a beard. Jeff, on the other hand, as a bigger guy, dominates his beard. |
Author: | legend_killer1 [ Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
The 2003 tour was a great one, but I agree, he's much better looking with long hair (and I'm a guy who NEVER judges other guys lol) He seems to perform a lot better too.. even tho he doesn't put the pressure into his voice like he used to, and the music's toned down a lot compared to the 1992 Pinkpop, or such shows.. |
Author: | adamdude [ Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:01 am ] |
Post subject: | |
spenno wrote: adamdude wrote: 2000 american tour would have been better if eddie had no facial hair. ooh yeah Is that why Europe 2000 was better? But...then, by that logic, 2006 would've sucked too. Bah! well... yeah... but mebbe... the 06 tour would have been even better if he had a shave? |
Author: | JimNasium [ Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:27 am ] |
Post subject: | |
The 2003 tour would've been better with a better album |
Author: | spenno [ Tue Mar 20, 2007 10:09 am ] |
Post subject: | |
adamdude wrote: spenno wrote: adamdude wrote: 2000 american tour would have been better if eddie had no facial hair. ooh yeah Is that why Europe 2000 was better? But...then, by that logic, 2006 would've sucked too. Bah! well... yeah... but mebbe... the 06 tour would have been even better if he had a shave? Well, 2006 was pretty unsurpassable for the most part. But yeah, I hate the beard. Ed looks tons better clean shaven. Man, does this thread ever question our collective sexuality or what. And just to increase that uneasiness a notch, I think Ed looked his best on the 2000 Euro tour. Hair of medium length, no beard - rockin' out but ina mature, wordly way. |
Author: | doone [ Tue Mar 20, 2007 11:22 am ] |
Post subject: | |
spenno wrote: Well, 2006 was pretty unsurpassable for the most part. But yeah, I hate the beard. Ed looks tons better clean shaven. Man, does this thread ever question our collective sexuality or what. And just to increase that uneasiness a notch, I think Ed looked his best on the 2000 Euro tour. Hair of medium length, no beard - rockin' out but ina mature, wordly way. Agreed |
Author: | stompbox [ Tue Mar 20, 2007 6:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The 2003 tour would have been better if Eddie had long h |
Farmer John wrote: :lol:
That's right...you know you agree with me. please do not turn this place into synergy... |
Author: | MadTIGERmaN [ Wed Mar 21, 2007 12:47 am ] |
Post subject: | |
long hair short hair AT LEAST HES NOT BLONDE ANYMORE hahahaha he looked like a damn California surfer with the blonde locks... wait, he is a damn cali surfer hahaha. I dont think the hair makes /breaks Ed / the band... but I will say... Ed looks better with long hair... then Stone and Mike did with long hair. BUT, Stone and Mike look better with short hair, then Ed did with short hair... So i guess they got the "look" right now? |
Author: | SLH916 [ Tue Mar 27, 2007 3:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
MadTIGERmaN wrote: long hair short hair
AT LEAST HES NOT BLONDE ANYMORE hahahaha he looked like a damn California surfer with the blonde locks... wait, he is a damn cali surfer hahaha. I dont think the hair makes /breaks Ed / the band... but I will say... Ed looks better with long hair... then Stone and Mike did with long hair. BUT, Stone and Mike look better with short hair, then Ed did with short hair... So i guess they got the "look" right now? except for Ed's beard. 2005 Canadian tour: liked the tour, liked Ed's look 2006: even better tour, not crazy about Ed's Messiah after 40 days in the desert look P.S. Stone looked cute with long hair |
Author: | operationcastle [ Tue Apr 03, 2007 12:13 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Ed's beard is awesome, I don't know what the fuck you guys are talking about. |
Author: | Colby892 [ Fri Apr 06, 2007 7:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
JimNasium wrote: The 2003 tour would've been better with a better album
Yeah i agree, Riot Act has its good ones but Yield would have fit this tour better. |
Author: | corduroy_blazer [ Thu Nov 22, 2012 3:54 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: The 2003 tour would have been better if Eddie had long hair |
I've decided to throw away all my 2003 boots and DVDs because of Ed's hair. Freaking ridiculous. I can't watch or listen to this stuff. He's like Bob Sagat or something. |
Author: | cutuphalfdead [ Thu Nov 22, 2012 5:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The 2003 tour would have been better if Eddie had long hair |
Dan Marino, I thought at the time. |
Author: | theplatypus [ Thu Nov 22, 2012 5:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The 2003 tour would have been better if Eddie had long hair |
Paul Reiser. |
Author: | mick7184 [ Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: The 2003 tour would have been better if Eddie had long hair |
They havent done a tour as good as the 03 tour since the 03 tour, so maybe he should have kept the hair short. |
Author: | Owl_Farmer [ Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:37 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: The 2003 tour would have been better if Eddie had long hair |
This thread is fucking disturbing. |
Page 2 of 2 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |