Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 2:06 pm Posts: 2539 Location: France
I second the proposition of transmission : it's lightweight, efficient, the only thing is that it don't have all the kind of fine-tuning you're allowed to do with azureus or µtorrent.
_________________
Owl_Farmer wrote:
this thread is the dumbest idea in the history of the internte
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 5:25 pm Posts: 35180 Location: Brasil Gender: Male
Walter Sobchak wrote:
I second the proposition of transmission : it's lightweight, efficient, the only thing is that it don't have all the kind of fine-tuning you're allowed to do with azureus or µtorrent.
mac only?
_________________ need you, dream you, find you, taste you, fuck you, use you, scar you, break you, lose me, hate me, smash me, erase me, kill me....
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 2:06 pm Posts: 2539 Location: France
Hell yes psychobain (btw, nice avatar !), i am running my comp with linux and i didnt realize that transmission wasn't ported for windows. It's sad because it works really great under linux and is very light in ressources.
_________________
Owl_Farmer wrote:
this thread is the dumbest idea in the history of the internte
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:08 pm Posts: 15892 Location: a wee green island Gender: Male
legend_killer1 wrote:
brainofpea wrote:
legend_killer1 wrote:
BitLord.. it was great to me before I discovered uTorrent.
Bitlord is banned from a lot of private trackers.
Shit ay? I didn't know that. Oh well, it was just a suggestion, surely there will be somethin' a bit better.
Don't get me wrong, I used it too. But if you read the rules from certain sites they ban it. And other clients based on the same programme. Like bitspirit, and others. I'm not sure of the reason.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum