Boy, 4, dies after riding Epcot attraction Autopsy showed no trauma, more tests planned Wednesday, June 15, 2005 Posted: 12:07 AM EDT (0407 GMT)
The 'Mission: Space' ride is one of Disney World's most popular attractions.
LAKE BUENA VISTA, Florida (AP) -- A 4-year-old boy died after a spin on a Walt Disney World spaceship ride so intense that it has motion sickness bags and several riders have been treated for chest pain.
Daudi Bamuwamye lost consciousness Monday aboard "Mission: Space," which spins riders in a giant centrifuge that subjects them to twice the normal force of gravity. The boy's mother carried him off the ride, and paramedics and a theme park worker tried to revive him, but he died at a hospital.
An autopsy Tuesday showed no trauma so further tests will be conducted and a cause of death may not be known for several weeks, said Sheri Blanton, a spokeswoman for the Medical Examiner's Office in Orlando.
The sheriff's office said the boy met the minimum 44-inch height requirement for the ride.
The $100 million ride, one of Disney World's most popular, was closed after the death but reopened Tuesday after company engineers concluded that it was operating normally.
Disney officials said in a statement that they were "providing support to the family and are doing everything we can to help them during this difficult time." No changes were made to the ride or in who is permitted to ride it.
"We believe the ride is safe in its current configuration," Disney spokeswoman Jacquee Polak said.
More than 8.6 million visitors have gone on "Mission: Space" since 2003, Polak said.
The ride recreates a rocket launch and a trip to Mars. A clock counts down before a simulated blastoff that includes smoke and flame and the sound of roaring rocket engines. The G-forces twist and distort riders' faces.
An audio recording and a video warn of the risks. Signs advise pregnant women not to go on the ride. Motion sickness bags are offered to riders. One warning sign posted last year read: "For safety you should be in good health, and free from high blood pressure, heart, back or neck problems, motion sickness or other conditions that can be aggravated by this adventure."
Since the attraction opened in 2003, seven people have been taken to the hospital for chest pains, fainting or nausea. That is the most hospital visits for a single ride since Florida's major theme parks agreed in 2001 to report any serious incidents to the state. The most recent case was last summer, when a 40-year-old woman was taken to a hospital after fainting.
"Two Gs is not that big a deal," said Houston-based theme park consultant Randy King, a former safety director at Six Flags, which operates 30 amusement parks.
The boy from Sellersville, Pennsylvania, was on the ride with his mother and a sister. During the ride, the mother noticed that Daudi's body was rigid and his legs were stretched straight out. She told detectives that she thought he was frightened, so she took his hand. When the ride was over, he had gone limp.
The boy's father is Moses Bamuwamye, a finance officer at the United Nations, authorities said.
One other death was reported at Disney World this year. A 77-year-old woman who was in poor health from diabetes and several ministrokes died in February after going on the Pirates of the Caribbean ride. A medical examiner's report said her death "was not unexpected."
Florida's major theme parks are not directly regulated by the state, and instead have their own inspectors.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:56 pm Posts: 19957 Location: Jenny Lewis' funbags
My parents were down there and went on that ride this year, and i think they were having problems with it. Once they got on, the worker came by and fastened them in and closed the door and everything....and then nothing happened. They sat there in this little cubicle strapped in for 10-15 minutes and the ride never started. Apperently my mom started freaking out and getting claustrophobic and banging on the door to let her out, and nobody did. It eventually started but that seems pretty weird.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 7:19 pm Posts: 39068 Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA Gender: Male
I can't believe a four year old was tall enough to get on the ride.
_________________ "Though some may think there should be a separation between art/music and politics, it should be reinforced that art can be a form of nonviolent protest." - e.v.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 7:54 am Posts: 10731 Location: The back of a Volkswagen
B wrote:
I can't believe a four year old was tall enough to get on the ride.
Exactly. That ride is insane too. I loved it. But there is no way a 4-year old should be let on that ride. Whoever was working the line fucked up big time.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 7:19 pm Posts: 39068 Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA Gender: Male
You must be this tall ...
_______________________________________________
... to have your brain bounced
against the inside of your skull.
_________________ "Though some may think there should be a separation between art/music and politics, it should be reinforced that art can be a form of nonviolent protest." - e.v.
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:54 pm Posts: 12287 Location: Manguetown Gender: Male
pussy
_________________ There's just no mercy in your eyes There ain't no time to set things right And I'm afraid I've lost the fight I'm just a painful reminder Another day you leave behind
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 7:19 pm Posts: 39068 Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA Gender: Male
Human Bass wrote:
pussy
I just laughed so hard that I cried.
_________________ "Though some may think there should be a separation between art/music and politics, it should be reinforced that art can be a form of nonviolent protest." - e.v.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:43 pm Posts: 7633 Location: Philly Del Fia Gender: Female
I don't care how tall the kid is.
You walk up to a ride with warning signs and barf bags, it's a pretty clear indication that it's NOT SUITABLE FOR 4 YEAR OLDS.
Selfish, stupid parents.
If the kid is tall enough, there's probably not much that the people running the ride can do to stop moronic parents from bringing their offspring into the ride.
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 3:08 pm Posts: 1440 Location: AAAAAAAAAAAAARIZONA Gender: Male
Those parents had better not sue Disney World for the death of that kid. Sure, it's a horrible thing, but the ride had ample warning, and it was the parents' own damn stupid decision to let a kid who was way too young ride the attraction.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:44 am Posts: 14671 Location: Baton Rouge Gender: Male
hammer wrote:
Those parents had better not sue Disney World for the death of that kid. Sure, it's a horrible thing, but the ride had ample warning, and it was the parents' own damn stupid decision to let a kid who was way too young ride the attraction.
so is it okay for disney to have a ride that kills as long as their is a warning?
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:51 am Posts: 15460 Location: Long Island, New York
Mitchell wrote:
hammer wrote:
Those parents had better not sue Disney World for the death of that kid. Sure, it's a horrible thing, but the ride had ample warning, and it was the parents' own damn stupid decision to let a kid who was way too young ride the attraction.
so is it okay for disney to have a ride that kills as long as their is a warning?
Works for cigarette companies.
_________________
lutor3f wrote:
Love is the delightful interval between meeting a beautiful girl and discovering that she looks like a haddock
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 3:08 pm Posts: 1440 Location: AAAAAAAAAAAAARIZONA Gender: Male
Mitchell wrote:
hammer wrote:
Those parents had better not sue Disney World for the death of that kid. Sure, it's a horrible thing, but the ride had ample warning, and it was the parents' own damn stupid decision to let a kid who was way too young ride the attraction.
so is it okay for disney to have a ride that kills as long as their is a warning?
I'm not saying that, I just think that a responsible parent should see that warning and think to himself or herself, "gee...this ride could be a little intense and too much for our four-year old, he should probably wait until he's older to let him ride this." I just think Disney shouldn't be held accountable for a parent's lack of responsibility.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:51 am Posts: 15460 Location: Long Island, New York
hammer wrote:
Mitchell wrote:
hammer wrote:
Those parents had better not sue Disney World for the death of that kid. Sure, it's a horrible thing, but the ride had ample warning, and it was the parents' own damn stupid decision to let a kid who was way too young ride the attraction.
so is it okay for disney to have a ride that kills as long as their is a warning?
I'm not saying that, I just think that a responsible parent should see that warning and think to himself or herself, "gee...this ride could be a little intense and too much for our four-year old, he should probably wait until he's older to let him ride this." I just think Disney shouldn't be held accountable for a parent's lack of responsibility.
"The sheriff's office said the boy met the minimum 44-inch height requirement for the ride."
They present riders with height restrictions which, in this case, was 44 inches. Assumably, if you fall above that range, wouldn't you assume that the ride is safe for you? If so, how can you consider this a "paren'ts lack of responsibility"?
_________________
lutor3f wrote:
Love is the delightful interval between meeting a beautiful girl and discovering that she looks like a haddock
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:43 pm Posts: 7633 Location: Philly Del Fia Gender: Female
bullet proof wrote:
hammer wrote:
Mitchell wrote:
hammer wrote:
Those parents had better not sue Disney World for the death of that kid. Sure, it's a horrible thing, but the ride had ample warning, and it was the parents' own damn stupid decision to let a kid who was way too young ride the attraction.
so is it okay for disney to have a ride that kills as long as their is a warning?
I'm not saying that, I just think that a responsible parent should see that warning and think to himself or herself, "gee...this ride could be a little intense and too much for our four-year old, he should probably wait until he's older to let him ride this." I just think Disney shouldn't be held accountable for a parent's lack of responsibility.
"The sheriff's office said the boy met the minimum 44-inch height requirement for the ride."
They present riders with height restrictions which, in this case, was 44 inches. Assumably, if you fall above that range, wouldn't you assume that the ride is safe for you? If so, how can you consider this a "paren'ts lack of responsibility"?
All that the height requirement gurantees is that the child won't fall out of the ride. He did not. It's not the parks responisibilty to make parenting decisions - especially not the kid at the front of the line.
Haven't you ever been on a roller coaster before? On any ride? There's always a sign posted warning against riders with heart conditions, pregnancies, bad backs, etc. It is the rider's responsibility to decide whether it is a safe, healthy idea to go onto that ride. For parents, the responsibility falls on them to decide if it's a good idea to bring a child on board.
So, no. The parent's can not sue. If the child was 13 or 14, and in good health, and someone else had died on the ride and they weren't told, then maybe. This wasn't a 13 year old however. This was a 4 year old that was strapped into a ride that had multiple warnings and motion sickness bags by his bonehead parent. Why? Because the parent wanted to ride it, and didn't want the kid to ruin their day.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum