Board index » Word on the Street... » News & Debate




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Did Clinton really do anything wrong?
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 6:28 am 
Offline
User avatar
Devil's Advocate
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:59 am
Posts: 18643
Location: Raleigh, NC
Gender: Male
I mean, she was over 16, right?


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 6:31 am 
Offline
User avatar
Force of Nature
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 12:10 am
Posts: 662
Location: Arvada, CO
Gender: Male
I'd "not have sexual relations with that woman" too. :wink:

_________________
...and then they made me their chief.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 6:40 am 
Offline
Got Some
 Profile

Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 11:16 pm
Posts: 1944
Location: Mass.
Well, he went through impeachment proceedings for perjury, not the oral sex he received from Lewinsky.
That being said, I think what he did was wrong on one level, but that being between him and his wife. I think it was improper for a President to get a bj in the Oval Office, but not nearly enough to be removed from office. But again, that wasn't why he was facing impeachment.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 6:44 am 
Offline
User avatar
Force of Nature
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 12:10 am
Posts: 662
Location: Arvada, CO
Gender: Male
LeninFlux wrote:
I think it was improper for a President to get a bj in the Oval Office...


You have to admit that would be awesome though... :P

_________________
...and then they made me their chief.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 6:48 am 
Offline
Got Some
 Profile

Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 11:16 pm
Posts: 1944
Location: Mass.
TomJoad187 wrote:
LeninFlux wrote:
I think it was improper for a President to get a bj in the Oval Office...


You have to admit that would be awesome though... :P


Perhaps, but Lewinsky? That kid who got it on with Debrah Lafarve did a lot better than Clinton.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 6:48 am 
Offline
User avatar
Devil's Advocate
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:59 am
Posts: 18643
Location: Raleigh, NC
Gender: Male
LeninFlux wrote:
Well, he went through impeachment proceedings for perjury, not the oral sex he received from Lewinsky.
That being said, I think what he did was wrong on one level, but that being between him and his wife. I think it was improper for a President to get a bj in the Oval Office, but not nearly enough to be removed from office. But again, that wasn't why he was facing impeachment.


So lying about getting a beejer is a big deal?


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 6:56 am 
Offline
User avatar
Force of Nature
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 12:10 am
Posts: 662
Location: Arvada, CO
Gender: Male
LeninFlux wrote:
TomJoad187 wrote:
LeninFlux wrote:
I think it was improper for a President to get a bj in the Oval Office...


You have to admit that would be awesome though... :P


Perhaps, but Lewinsky? That kid who got it on with Debrah Lafarve did a lot better than Clinton.


Was that the hot teacher? Seriously, was that kid being taken advantage of?

_________________
...and then they made me their chief.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 7:00 am 
Offline
Got Some
 Profile

Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 11:16 pm
Posts: 1944
Location: Mass.
TomJoad187 wrote:
LeninFlux wrote:
TomJoad187 wrote:
LeninFlux wrote:
I think it was improper for a President to get a bj in the Oval Office...


You have to admit that would be awesome though... :P


Perhaps, but Lewinsky? That kid who got it on with Debrah Lafarve did a lot better than Clinton.


Was that the hot teacher? Seriously, was that kid being taken advantage of?


Yes. She's under house arrest and recently did an interview with Matt Lauer. Best quote from her - "Yeah, he wanted it...and yeah, I gave it to him."

Did she take advantage of that kid? Yes.
If I were his peer would he be my new personal hero? Yes.
If I were that kid would I feel that I had been taken advantaged of? No.
But she is a headcase. She kept trying to contact the kid after she was initially arrested.
Her case displays a double-standard. If the genders had been reversed, a male teacher would not have been given house arrest...he'd be in jail.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 7:48 am 
Offline
User avatar
Force of Nature
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 12:10 am
Posts: 662
Location: Arvada, CO
Gender: Male
LeninFlux wrote:
TomJoad187 wrote:
LeninFlux wrote:
TomJoad187 wrote:
LeninFlux wrote:
I think it was improper for a President to get a bj in the Oval Office...


You have to admit that would be awesome though... :P


Perhaps, but Lewinsky? That kid who got it on with Debrah Lafarve did a lot better than Clinton.


Was that the hot teacher? Seriously, was that kid being taken advantage of?


Yes. She's under house arrest and recently did an interview with Matt Lauer. Best quote from her - "Yeah, he wanted it...and yeah, I gave it to him."

Did she take advantage of that kid? Yes.
If I were his peer would he be my new personal hero? Yes.
If I were that kid would I feel that I had been taken advantaged of? No.
But she is a headcase. She kept trying to contact the kid after she was initially arrested.
Her case displays a double-standard. If the genders had been reversed, a male teacher would not have been given house arrest...he'd be in jail.


Yeah...but allow me to make a generalization here...

Boys "taken advantage of" in situations like this don't typically grow up with anything more than a chip on their shoulder...sure, they might have more misogynistic tendencies, but there are plenty of assholes in the world.

If listening to Loveline has taught me anything, this behavior with genders reversed would result in a girl growing up to be a stripper, a porn actress, or a whore. Plus, women run a risk of becoming pregnant...as I'm sure you know.

I'm not condoning that teacher's actions, but there is a big difference between an older woman seducing a younger boy, than a man seducing a girl. Even if it's just sociologically. Bill Maher called the former, "a coming of age story." I dunno...I just wish I had a teacher that was that hot...

_________________
...and then they made me their chief.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Unthought Known
 Profile

Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 4:49 pm
Posts: 9495
Location: Richie-Richville, Maryland
Athletic Supporter wrote:
LeninFlux wrote:
Well, he went through impeachment proceedings for perjury, not the oral sex he received from Lewinsky.
That being said, I think what he did was wrong on one level, but that being between him and his wife. I think it was improper for a President to get a bj in the Oval Office, but not nearly enough to be removed from office. But again, that wasn't why he was facing impeachment.


So lying about getting a beejer is a big deal?



It's the perjury that was the "legal issue". Lying about getting a BJ under oath or in a sworn deposition (Paula Jones) is illegal. Infidelity is a moral issue.

A poltician is expected to lie to the press and the people, that's their job. But if perjury is a jailable offense for us slaves, then it should be for our enlightened masters as well.

_________________
you get a lifetime, that's it.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Administrator
 Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:53 pm
Posts: 20537
Location: The City Of Trees
I've always felt that Clinton was simply stupid to commit perjury in the first place. No one would have really been shocked or anything given Clinton's history with women.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 3:09 pm
Posts: 10839
Location: metro west, mass
Gender: Male
What the fuck DID he do wrong? Sexual harassment?

Geez, it seems like everything falls under sexual harassment. The dude was just trying to get laid, ntohing wrong with that. If wifey can't satisfy him, that's her own damn fault.

Also, it was just a stupid blowjob. It wasn't a mutal thing, SHE was trying to please HIM. It was a one-way street, so Clinton didn't do shit. Now, if he went down on her, that would be a different story.

_________________
"There are two ways to enslave and conquer a nation. One is by the sword. The other is by debt." -John Adams


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Unthought Known
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 2:29 pm
Posts: 6217
Location: Evil Bunny Land
Sunny wrote:
What the fuck DID he do wrong? Sexual harassment?

Geez, it seems like everything falls under sexual harassment. The dude was just trying to get laid, ntohing wrong with that. If wifey can't satisfy him, that's her own damn fault.

Also, it was just a stupid blowjob. It wasn't a mutal thing, SHE was trying to please HIM. It was a one-way street, so Clinton didn't do shit. Now, if he went down on her, that would be a different story.


Come on, dude. You can't be serious.

Adultery is permissable if the wife can't satisfy her husband? Blowjobs in the workplace are permissable?

Our standards really can't drop that low.

_________________
“Some things have got to be believed to be seen.”
- Ralph Hodgson


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:58 pm
Posts: 3567
Location: west side of washington state
Gimme Some Skin wrote:
Sunny wrote:
What the fuck DID he do wrong? Sexual harassment?

Geez, it seems like everything falls under sexual harassment. The dude was just trying to get laid, ntohing wrong with that. If wifey can't satisfy him, that's her own damn fault.

Also, it was just a stupid blowjob. It wasn't a mutal thing, SHE was trying to please HIM. It was a one-way street, so Clinton didn't do shit. Now, if he went down on her, that would be a different story.


Come on, dude. You can't be serious.

Adultery is permissable if the wife can't satisfy her husband? Blowjobs in the workplace are permissable?

Our standards really can't drop that low.



well, he did his best with The Cigar.




honestly, that's whacked. that's no excuse for cheating on your spouse.

_________________
Ensign9 wrote:
pops your head off like a cork


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Got Some
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 5:22 am
Posts: 1603
Location: Buffalo
The real question, IMO, is why Clinton was being asked about Lewinsky in the first place. Who really cared other than his wife and daughter? All that money, time and headaches wasted on nothing.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 3:09 pm
Posts: 10839
Location: metro west, mass
Gender: Male
Gimme Some Skin wrote:
Sunny wrote:
What the fuck DID he do wrong? Sexual harassment?

Geez, it seems like everything falls under sexual harassment. The dude was just trying to get laid, ntohing wrong with that. If wifey can't satisfy him, that's her own damn fault.

Also, it was just a stupid blowjob. It wasn't a mutal thing, SHE was trying to please HIM. It was a one-way street, so Clinton didn't do shit. Now, if he went down on her, that would be a different story.


Come on, dude. You can't be serious.

Adultery is permissable if the wife can't satisfy her husband? Blowjobs in the workplace are permissable?

Our standards really can't drop that low.


Blowjobs in the workplace are not permissible, and no excuse for cheating on your wife, agreed. I do think that the scolding Clinton recieved is far worse than the Foley scandal.

_________________
"There are two ways to enslave and conquer a nation. One is by the sword. The other is by debt." -John Adams


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Unthought Known
 Profile

Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 4:49 pm
Posts: 9495
Location: Richie-Richville, Maryland
vegman wrote:
The real question, IMO, is why Clinton was being asked about Lewinsky in the first place. Who really cared other than his wife and daughter? All that money, time and headaches wasted on nothing.


Because the President is suppose to set an example and infidelity is considered wrong by many people.

_________________
you get a lifetime, that's it.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:58 pm
Posts: 3567
Location: west side of washington state
broken iris wrote:
vegman wrote:
The real question, IMO, is why Clinton was being asked about Lewinsky in the first place. Who really cared other than his wife and daughter? All that money, time and headaches wasted on nothing.


Because the President is suppose to set an example and infidelity is considered wrong by many people.


lesser of two (or more) evils, I feel. if I had to choose between a man who allowed his infidelities to seep into the oval office & and a man who lied to the entire world about his reasons for sending so many of our men & women to die in iraq, well.

not that clinton was perfect, by any means. just to me so very much better than the opossum we have in the white house right now.

_________________
Ensign9 wrote:
pops your head off like a cork


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Unthought Known
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 2:29 pm
Posts: 6217
Location: Evil Bunny Land
JamElizabeth wrote:
broken iris wrote:
vegman wrote:
The real question, IMO, is why Clinton was being asked about Lewinsky in the first place. Who really cared other than his wife and daughter? All that money, time and headaches wasted on nothing.


Because the President is suppose to set an example and infidelity is considered wrong by many people.


lesser of two (or more) evils, I feel. if I had to choose between a man who allowed his infidelities to seep into the oval office & and a man who lied to the entire world about his reasons for sending so many of our men & women to die in iraq, well.

not that clinton was perfect, by any means. just to me so very much better than the opossum we have in the white house right now.


I definitely agree with that.

I would just like to have a president that is honest and has some sort of morals. Morals that he not only preaches, but lives by.

_________________
“Some things have got to be believed to be seen.”
- Ralph Hodgson


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:58 pm
Posts: 3567
Location: west side of washington state
Gimme Some Skin wrote:
JamElizabeth wrote:
broken iris wrote:
vegman wrote:
The real question, IMO, is why Clinton was being asked about Lewinsky in the first place. Who really cared other than his wife and daughter? All that money, time and headaches wasted on nothing.


Because the President is suppose to set an example and infidelity is considered wrong by many people.


lesser of two (or more) evils, I feel. if I had to choose between a man who allowed his infidelities to seep into the oval office & and a man who lied to the entire world about his reasons for sending so many of our men & women to die in iraq, well.

not that clinton was perfect, by any means. just to me so very much better than the opossum we have in the white house right now.


I definitely agree with that.

I would just like to have a president that is honest and has some sort of morals. Morals that he not only preaches, but lives by.


:|

politics has always been the choice between the lesser of two evils. or three.

_________________
Ensign9 wrote:
pops your head off like a cork


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Board index » Word on the Street... » News & Debate


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
It is currently Mon Jan 26, 2026 10:12 pm