Well, he went through impeachment proceedings for perjury, not the oral sex he received from Lewinsky.
That being said, I think what he did was wrong on one level, but that being between him and his wife. I think it was improper for a President to get a bj in the Oval Office, but not nearly enough to be removed from office. But again, that wasn't why he was facing impeachment.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:59 am Posts: 18643 Location: Raleigh, NC Gender: Male
LeninFlux wrote:
Well, he went through impeachment proceedings for perjury, not the oral sex he received from Lewinsky. That being said, I think what he did was wrong on one level, but that being between him and his wife. I think it was improper for a President to get a bj in the Oval Office, but not nearly enough to be removed from office. But again, that wasn't why he was facing impeachment.
I think it was improper for a President to get a bj in the Oval Office...
You have to admit that would be awesome though...
Perhaps, but Lewinsky? That kid who got it on with Debrah Lafarve did a lot better than Clinton.
Was that the hot teacher? Seriously, was that kid being taken advantage of?
Yes. She's under house arrest and recently did an interview with Matt Lauer. Best quote from her - "Yeah, he wanted it...and yeah, I gave it to him."
Did she take advantage of that kid? Yes.
If I were his peer would he be my new personal hero? Yes.
If I were that kid would I feel that I had been taken advantaged of? No.
But she is a headcase. She kept trying to contact the kid after she was initially arrested.
Her case displays a double-standard. If the genders had been reversed, a male teacher would not have been given house arrest...he'd be in jail.
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 12:10 am Posts: 662 Location: Arvada, CO Gender: Male
LeninFlux wrote:
TomJoad187 wrote:
LeninFlux wrote:
TomJoad187 wrote:
LeninFlux wrote:
I think it was improper for a President to get a bj in the Oval Office...
You have to admit that would be awesome though...
Perhaps, but Lewinsky? That kid who got it on with Debrah Lafarve did a lot better than Clinton.
Was that the hot teacher? Seriously, was that kid being taken advantage of?
Yes. She's under house arrest and recently did an interview with Matt Lauer. Best quote from her - "Yeah, he wanted it...and yeah, I gave it to him."
Did she take advantage of that kid? Yes. If I were his peer would he be my new personal hero? Yes. If I were that kid would I feel that I had been taken advantaged of? No. But she is a headcase. She kept trying to contact the kid after she was initially arrested. Her case displays a double-standard. If the genders had been reversed, a male teacher would not have been given house arrest...he'd be in jail.
Yeah...but allow me to make a generalization here...
Boys "taken advantage of" in situations like this don't typically grow up with anything more than a chip on their shoulder...sure, they might have more misogynistic tendencies, but there are plenty of assholes in the world.
If listening to Loveline has taught me anything, this behavior with genders reversed would result in a girl growing up to be a stripper, a porn actress, or a whore. Plus, women run a risk of becoming pregnant...as I'm sure you know.
I'm not condoning that teacher's actions, but there is a big difference between an older woman seducing a younger boy, than a man seducing a girl. Even if it's just sociologically. Bill Maher called the former, "a coming of age story." I dunno...I just wish I had a teacher that was that hot...
_________________ ...and then they made me their chief.
Well, he went through impeachment proceedings for perjury, not the oral sex he received from Lewinsky. That being said, I think what he did was wrong on one level, but that being between him and his wife. I think it was improper for a President to get a bj in the Oval Office, but not nearly enough to be removed from office. But again, that wasn't why he was facing impeachment.
So lying about getting a beejer is a big deal?
It's the perjury that was the "legal issue". Lying about getting a BJ under oath or in a sworn deposition (Paula Jones) is illegal. Infidelity is a moral issue.
A poltician is expected to lie to the press and the people, that's their job. But if perjury is a jailable offense for us slaves, then it should be for our enlightened masters as well.
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:53 pm Posts: 20537 Location: The City Of Trees
I've always felt that Clinton was simply stupid to commit perjury in the first place. No one would have really been shocked or anything given Clinton's history with women.
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 3:09 pm Posts: 10839 Location: metro west, mass Gender: Male
What the fuck DID he do wrong? Sexual harassment?
Geez, it seems like everything falls under sexual harassment. The dude was just trying to get laid, ntohing wrong with that. If wifey can't satisfy him, that's her own damn fault.
Also, it was just a stupid blowjob. It wasn't a mutal thing, SHE was trying to please HIM. It was a one-way street, so Clinton didn't do shit. Now, if he went down on her, that would be a different story.
_________________ "There are two ways to enslave and conquer a nation. One is by the sword. The other is by debt." -John Adams
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 2:29 pm Posts: 6217 Location: Evil Bunny Land
Sunny wrote:
What the fuck DID he do wrong? Sexual harassment?
Geez, it seems like everything falls under sexual harassment. The dude was just trying to get laid, ntohing wrong with that. If wifey can't satisfy him, that's her own damn fault.
Also, it was just a stupid blowjob. It wasn't a mutal thing, SHE was trying to please HIM. It was a one-way street, so Clinton didn't do shit. Now, if he went down on her, that would be a different story.
Come on, dude. You can't be serious.
Adultery is permissable if the wife can't satisfy her husband? Blowjobs in the workplace are permissable?
Our standards really can't drop that low.
_________________ “Some things have got to be believed to be seen.”
- Ralph Hodgson
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:58 pm Posts: 3567 Location: west side of washington state
Gimme Some Skin wrote:
Sunny wrote:
What the fuck DID he do wrong? Sexual harassment?
Geez, it seems like everything falls under sexual harassment. The dude was just trying to get laid, ntohing wrong with that. If wifey can't satisfy him, that's her own damn fault.
Also, it was just a stupid blowjob. It wasn't a mutal thing, SHE was trying to please HIM. It was a one-way street, so Clinton didn't do shit. Now, if he went down on her, that would be a different story.
Come on, dude. You can't be serious.
Adultery is permissable if the wife can't satisfy her husband? Blowjobs in the workplace are permissable?
Our standards really can't drop that low.
well, he did his best with The Cigar.
honestly, that's whacked. that's no excuse for cheating on your spouse.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 5:22 am Posts: 1603 Location: Buffalo
The real question, IMO, is why Clinton was being asked about Lewinsky in the first place. Who really cared other than his wife and daughter? All that money, time and headaches wasted on nothing.
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 3:09 pm Posts: 10839 Location: metro west, mass Gender: Male
Gimme Some Skin wrote:
Sunny wrote:
What the fuck DID he do wrong? Sexual harassment?
Geez, it seems like everything falls under sexual harassment. The dude was just trying to get laid, ntohing wrong with that. If wifey can't satisfy him, that's her own damn fault.
Also, it was just a stupid blowjob. It wasn't a mutal thing, SHE was trying to please HIM. It was a one-way street, so Clinton didn't do shit. Now, if he went down on her, that would be a different story.
Come on, dude. You can't be serious.
Adultery is permissable if the wife can't satisfy her husband? Blowjobs in the workplace are permissable?
Our standards really can't drop that low.
Blowjobs in the workplace are not permissible, and no excuse for cheating on your wife, agreed. I do think that the scolding Clinton recieved is far worse than the Foley scandal.
_________________ "There are two ways to enslave and conquer a nation. One is by the sword. The other is by debt." -John Adams
The real question, IMO, is why Clinton was being asked about Lewinsky in the first place. Who really cared other than his wife and daughter? All that money, time and headaches wasted on nothing.
Because the President is suppose to set an example and infidelity is considered wrong by many people.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:58 pm Posts: 3567 Location: west side of washington state
broken iris wrote:
vegman wrote:
The real question, IMO, is why Clinton was being asked about Lewinsky in the first place. Who really cared other than his wife and daughter? All that money, time and headaches wasted on nothing.
Because the President is suppose to set an example and infidelity is considered wrong by many people.
lesser of two (or more) evils, I feel. if I had to choose between a man who allowed his infidelities to seep into the oval office & and a man who lied to the entire world about his reasons for sending so many of our men & women to die in iraq, well.
not that clinton was perfect, by any means. just to me so very much better than the opossum we have in the white house right now.
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 2:29 pm Posts: 6217 Location: Evil Bunny Land
JamElizabeth wrote:
broken iris wrote:
vegman wrote:
The real question, IMO, is why Clinton was being asked about Lewinsky in the first place. Who really cared other than his wife and daughter? All that money, time and headaches wasted on nothing.
Because the President is suppose to set an example and infidelity is considered wrong by many people.
lesser of two (or more) evils, I feel. if I had to choose between a man who allowed his infidelities to seep into the oval office & and a man who lied to the entire world about his reasons for sending so many of our men & women to die in iraq, well.
not that clinton was perfect, by any means. just to me so very much better than the opossum we have in the white house right now.
I definitely agree with that.
I would just like to have a president that is honest and has some sort of morals. Morals that he not only preaches, but lives by.
_________________ “Some things have got to be believed to be seen.”
- Ralph Hodgson
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:58 pm Posts: 3567 Location: west side of washington state
Gimme Some Skin wrote:
JamElizabeth wrote:
broken iris wrote:
vegman wrote:
The real question, IMO, is why Clinton was being asked about Lewinsky in the first place. Who really cared other than his wife and daughter? All that money, time and headaches wasted on nothing.
Because the President is suppose to set an example and infidelity is considered wrong by many people.
lesser of two (or more) evils, I feel. if I had to choose between a man who allowed his infidelities to seep into the oval office & and a man who lied to the entire world about his reasons for sending so many of our men & women to die in iraq, well.
not that clinton was perfect, by any means. just to me so very much better than the opossum we have in the white house right now.
I definitely agree with that.
I would just like to have a president that is honest and has some sort of morals. Morals that he not only preaches, but lives by.
politics has always been the choice between the lesser of two evils. or three.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum