Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:53 pm Posts: 20537 Location: The City Of Trees
Yay or nay? Or is there a middle ground that can be reached?
I like the concept of the citizens directly voting on laws, but it's clear that this can be abused. Living in Oregon for four years, it was extremely evident, with dozens of propositions making the ballot and most of them being ridiculous, thanks to guys like Bill Sizemore: http://www.blueoregon.com/2005/03/bill_sizemores_.html
Also going on here in the West is a guy from New York that's littered our ballots with all kinds of propositions.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:14 am Posts: 37778 Location: OmaGOD!!! Gender: Male
I'm pretty much against direct democracy in general. The voters are barely educated enough to vote for a representative, much less to do the work that our representatives are supposed to be doing themselves. Especially voting on constitutional amendments. People don't understand the gravity of this, it's just one of a dozen questions on a ballot that they get to exercise their rights and make an uninformed decision of "yes" or "no".
I'm also completely and utterly against electing judges, but that's a different thread.
Basically, we elect representatives in our representative democracy so that they can concentrate on these issues, understand them, and vote on them so that we don't have to. Even a bad representative is almost always better than your average dipshit voter.
_________________ Unfortunately, at the Dawning of the Age of Aquarius, the Flower Children jerked off and went back to sleep.
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:53 pm Posts: 20537 Location: The City Of Trees
punkdavid wrote:
I'm pretty much against direct democracy in general. The voters are barely educated enough to vote for a representative, much less to do the work that our representatives are supposed to be doing themselves. Especially voting on constitutional amendments. People don't understand the gravity of this, it's just one of a dozen questions on a ballot that they get to exercise their rights and make an uninformed decision of "yes" or "no".
I'm also completely and utterly against electing judges, but that's a different thread.
Basically, we elect representatives in our representative democracy so that they can concentrate on these issues, understand them, and vote on them so that we don't have to. Even a bad representative is almost always better than your average dipshit voter.
Somehow, this is exactly what I thought you'd say.
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 1:54 am Posts: 7189 Location: CA
Green Habit wrote:
punkdavid wrote:
I'm pretty much against direct democracy in general. The voters are barely educated enough to vote for a representative, much less to do the work that our representatives are supposed to be doing themselves. Especially voting on constitutional amendments. People don't understand the gravity of this, it's just one of a dozen questions on a ballot that they get to exercise their rights and make an uninformed decision of "yes" or "no".
I'm also completely and utterly against electing judges, but that's a different thread.
Basically, we elect representatives in our representative democracy so that they can concentrate on these issues, understand them, and vote on them so that we don't have to. Even a bad representative is almost always better than your average dipshit voter.
Somehow, this is exactly what I thought you'd say.
PD's elitist and undemocratic, but we love him anyway.
I'm pretty much against direct democracy in general. The voters are barely educated enough to vote for a representative, much less to do the work that our representatives are supposed to be doing themselves. Especially voting on constitutional amendments. People don't understand the gravity of this, it's just one of a dozen questions on a ballot that they get to exercise their rights and make an uninformed decision of "yes" or "no".
I'm also completely and utterly against electing judges, but that's a different thread.
Basically, we elect representatives in our representative democracy so that they can concentrate on these issues, understand them, and vote on them so that we don't have to. Even a bad representative is almost always better than your average dipshit voter.
I agree. I'm just wondering why the carpet isn't rolled out when I make crass, toungue and cheek, but to the point posts like this...
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:14 am Posts: 37778 Location: OmaGOD!!! Gender: Male
LittleWing wrote:
punkdavid wrote:
I'm pretty much against direct democracy in general. The voters are barely educated enough to vote for a representative, much less to do the work that our representatives are supposed to be doing themselves. Especially voting on constitutional amendments. People don't understand the gravity of this, it's just one of a dozen questions on a ballot that they get to exercise their rights and make an uninformed decision of "yes" or "no".
I'm also completely and utterly against electing judges, but that's a different thread.
Basically, we elect representatives in our representative democracy so that they can concentrate on these issues, understand them, and vote on them so that we don't have to. Even a bad representative is almost always better than your average dipshit voter.
I agree. I'm just wondering why the carpet isn't rolled out when I make crass, toungue and cheek, but to the point posts like this...
and who's being tongue-in-cheek?
_________________ Unfortunately, at the Dawning of the Age of Aquarius, the Flower Children jerked off and went back to sleep.
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:51 pm Posts: 14534 Location: Mesa,AZ
I used to think it was a cool idea, but after studying how it actually works out here in AZ (read: voters are total idiots), I'm now convinced it's useless and even harmful at times. Someone should start an initiative here to get rid of initiatives.
_________________
John Adams wrote:
In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a congress.
I'm know there are plenty of uninformed voters, but to say that the voters are "barely educated enough to vote for a representative" is baseless and idiotic in itself.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:14 am Posts: 37778 Location: OmaGOD!!! Gender: Male
LeninFlux wrote:
I'm know there are plenty of uninformed voters, but to say that the voters are "barely educated enough to vote for a representative" is baseless and idiotic in itself.
_________________ Unfortunately, at the Dawning of the Age of Aquarius, the Flower Children jerked off and went back to sleep.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum