heard about it yesterday but didn't want to jump the gun.... here's the sun times article... if it happens everybody's invited to my apartment before hand for a big-ass party!
_________________ He not busy being born is busy dying
~dylan
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:01 am Posts: 19477 Location: Brooklyn NY
That is wicked sick news
_________________
LittleWing sometime in July 2007 wrote:
Unfortunately, it's so elementary, and the big time investors behind the drive in the stock market aren't so stupid. This isn't the false economy of 2000.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:52 pm Posts: 6822 Location: NY Gender: Male
The owners of the seats overlooking Wrigley may have right to complain. They've already been screwed over by having to pay money to the Cubs, in my opinion. However, they could make quite the haul in the off-season with some concerts.
In a way, I understand the complaints of regular citizens of the area. It's not exactly a park out in the middle of nowhere. It's smack dab in the middle of upper middle class Chicago, and they deal with Cubs games, but that's all they expect. Of course, if PJ played a show at Wrigley, I'd give my first born (if that ever happens) to attend the concert.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:59 am Posts: 18643 Location: Raleigh, NC Gender: Male
Go_State wrote:
In a way, I understand the complaints of regular citizens of the area. It's not exactly a park out in the middle of nowhere. It's smack dab in the middle of upper middle class Chicago, and they deal with Cubs games, but that's all they expect. Of course, if PJ played a show at Wrigley, I'd give my first born (if that ever happens) to attend the concert.
The park has been there for 90 years, it's not like they just put it up in the middle of the night. How can you possibly complain about things that happen at a stadium when you live right next door? MOVE.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:52 pm Posts: 6822 Location: NY Gender: Male
Athletic Supporter wrote:
Go_State wrote:
In a way, I understand the complaints of regular citizens of the area. It's not exactly a park out in the middle of nowhere. It's smack dab in the middle of upper middle class Chicago, and they deal with Cubs games, but that's all they expect. Of course, if PJ played a show at Wrigley, I'd give my first born (if that ever happens) to attend the concert.
The park has been there for 90 years, it's not like they just put it up in the middle of the night. How can you possibly complain about things that happen at a stadium when you live right next door? MOVE.
I agree, and I don't think it's right. However, you must know the residents of the area will complain about late night concerts, claiming that somehow concerts were never a part of what they expected, just late night Cubs' games.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 7:31 pm Posts: 813 Location: IA
This line struck me as hilarious:
"We're suffering already with 81 home games. It was a major concession to allow them to get up to 30 night games. Now, they want to bring in more night events. It would be a total disruption of the neighborhood."
I'm one of the people who would give their left nut to live near Wrigley. What a fool.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:14 am Posts: 37778 Location: OmaGOD!!! Gender: Male
Jimmy Buffet is a "high quality audience"?
I lived on Clark Street in Lakeview about a mile south of Wrigley and the streets are a disaster even that far away on game day. What is two or three more events a year? It's not like they can play outdoor concerts there much outside the baseball season anyway. You ever been to Chicago from October to March?
October 9, 2000, Allstate Arena, Rosemont, IL. Temperature at showtime, 33 degrees F. (and a 2hr line to pick up Ten Club Tickets)
--PunkDavid
_________________ Unfortunately, at the Dawning of the Age of Aquarius, the Flower Children jerked off and went back to sleep.
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:52 pm Posts: 10620 Location: Chicago, IL Gender: Male
Go_State wrote:
The owners of the seats overlooking Wrigley may have right to complain. They've already been screwed over by having to pay money to the Cubs, in my opinion. However, they could make quite the haul in the off-season with some concerts.
For the record, those "poor" rooftop owners pull in over $17 million a year by stealing a non-licensed product of Major League Baseball . . .
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:15 pm Posts: 85 Location: Chicago, IL
Chris_H_2 wrote:
Go_State wrote:
The owners of the seats overlooking Wrigley may have right to complain. They've already been screwed over by having to pay money to the Cubs, in my opinion. However, they could make quite the haul in the off-season with some concerts.
For the record, those "poor" rooftop owners pull in over $17 million a year by stealing a non-licensed product of Major League Baseball . . .
sure, those rooftop seats are way too expensive... but i don't see why it should be considered stealing. they're taking advantage of their view... that's like saying an ocean-view property is stealing for the first however many miles of view from the tax payers who own the ocean waters.
_________________ He not busy being born is busy dying
~dylan
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
