Post subject: Rumsfeld had machine sign sympathy letters...
Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2004 9:13 pm
Unthought Known
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:46 pm Posts: 9617 Location: Medford, Oregon Gender: Male
...to the families of soldiers killed in Iraq. And still, despite criticism from every direction, the White House continues to say what a great job he's doing.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:01 am Posts: 19477 Location: Brooklyn NY
deathbyflannel wrote:
I feel this is a non-issue.
This isn't a non-issue. Don't you find the disconnection a bit disturbing? I mean we are in a war, and when the leader of the department, a long time "public servant," who's cronies in the administration are obsessed with promoting "democracy" and patriotism, the very people who planned this war since fall of '01, isn't personally signing letters to dead people's families, people who died supposedly defending our freedoms, doesn't that bother you somewhat?
_________________
LittleWing sometime in July 2007 wrote:
Unfortunately, it's so elementary, and the big time investors behind the drive in the stock market aren't so stupid. This isn't the false economy of 2000.
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 1:54 am Posts: 7189 Location: CA
glorified_version wrote:
deathbyflannel wrote:
I feel this is a non-issue.
This isn't a non-issue. Don't you find the disconnection a bit disturbing? I mean we are in a war, and when the leader of the department, a long time "public servant," who's cronies in the administration are obsessed with promoting "democracy" and patriotism, the very people who planned this war since fall of '01, isn't personally signing letters to dead people's families, people who died supposedly defending our freedoms, doesn't that bother you somewhat?
Did you ever see that Seinfeld episode where Jerry gets all those 12 cent royalty checks from a Japanese comedy video? Perhaps after casualty 1,000, Rummy began getting concerned about carpal tunnel and felt that an automated signature would be a great benefit to his health. Do you really want your tax money going to pay for his medical bills?
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:01 am Posts: 19477 Location: Brooklyn NY
simple schoolboy wrote:
glorified_version wrote:
deathbyflannel wrote:
I feel this is a non-issue.
This isn't a non-issue. Don't you find the disconnection a bit disturbing? I mean we are in a war, and when the leader of the department, a long time "public servant," who's cronies in the administration are obsessed with promoting "democracy" and patriotism, the very people who planned this war since fall of '01, isn't personally signing letters to dead people's families, people who died supposedly defending our freedoms, doesn't that bother you somewhat?
Did you ever see that Seinfeld episode where Jerry gets all those 12 cent royalty checks from a Japanese comedy video? Perhaps after casualty 1,000, Rummy began getting concerned about carpal tunnel and felt that an automated signature would be a great benefit to his health. Do you really want your tax money going to pay for his medical bills?
I guess that's a very good point, except now he's actually signing the letters
_________________
LittleWing sometime in July 2007 wrote:
Unfortunately, it's so elementary, and the big time investors behind the drive in the stock market aren't so stupid. This isn't the false economy of 2000.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:35 am Posts: 1311 Location: Lexington
Signing these letters is a non-issue im sorry. I am not trying to de-humanize the war nor am I trying to justify Rummy's actions, but using an auto pen for signatures does not surprise or infuriate me in the least. That is my stance, learn to come to terms with it.
There are many MANY other issues that should demand your attention, especially in concern to our contemporary conflict in Iraq. To think that Rumsfield would suddenly change his mind the war by signing a thousand letters would be absurd, obtuse, and baseless. He obviously doesn't share the same ideals as most of you so I do not believe this will alter his policy. Would you prefer he signed several thousand blank whitehouse letterhead so he is prepared for more dead soldiers? This may ease your conscience but its would be a hollow fucking moral victory. Lets be serious, people are still dying and all youve done is enable him.
_________________
punkdavid wrote:
Make sure to bring a bottle of vitriol. And wear a condom so you don't insinuate her.
if he had signed them all by hand, would it really make them any more personal. odds are, and this is probably going to sound cold, that rumsey can remember 30 of the names let alone all of them
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 5:58 am Posts: 4417 Location: a block from yoko Gender: Female
malice wrote:
I was under the impression Rumsfeld is a machine.
and this whole thing would be a non-issue if he hadnt made it a big issue that he would be signing all of them. its just another facet of him being a douchebag...
_________________ dash sez:
i found r.m because i was doing research on skyscrapers
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:46 pm Posts: 9617 Location: Medford, Oregon Gender: Male
Quote:
Hagel noted that the families of the troops killed in Iraq have received letters signed by Bush.
"My goodness, that is the least we can expect the secretary of Defense ... If the president can find the time to do that why can't the secretary of Defense?" said Hagel, who has been a sharp critic of the way Bush has handled the Iraq war.
Quote:
Democrat Jack Reed of Rhode Island said family members of those killed, "would like to think that at least for a moment the secretary thought about individually this young man or this young woman."
I don't think it's a non-issue to those who have lost family members in Iraq either, but then again, who cares what they think, right?
_________________ Deep below the dunes I roved Past the rows, past the rows Beside the acacias freshly in bloom I sent men to their doom
Auto-pen is a feature for every governmental office. We have several in my department.
Machine signed or not, these letters can't possibly fill the gap of a lost child, husband, wife, or parent.
Pick your battles, people. This isn't one of them.
This story was first broken by that liberal rag, Stars and Stripes. Unfortunately, they don't get to pick their battles.
--PunkDavid
Well, I'm sure you'll also be disappointed to know that Rumsfeld doesn't even lick the envelopes. A machine steams the seals shut.
And I wasn't aware journalism was a weapon in public protest. It might be a catalyst for activism, but isn't against a journalist's ethics to assume a position and report for bias purposes?
It's like Ed Wallace (I think) rescuing a drowning man during filming for 60 minutes. He said (and I paraphrase), "I wasn't sure, as a journalist, to make him part of the story, or to save him, and ruin my story completely."
You're missing my point. If you want to be angry about war, be angry about war. Don't picket the US Post Office c/o the DoD because a KIA letter is auto-penned. Picket the DoD direct about KIA's period.
I don't think it's a non-issue to those who have lost family members in Iraq either, but then again, who cares what they think, right?
With all due respect, quit being such a fucking drama queen. Putting words in people's mouths, especially those people you disagree with, discredits a majority of what you say.
I'm aware of a smarter ElPhantasmo, and I may personally vouch that he exits, and could possibly offer something better than assumptive euphamisms.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:14 am Posts: 37778 Location: OmaGOD!!! Gender: Male
Nothing personal on you, but I find the term "KIA letter" equally representative of the detachment of DoD from the actual fighting as anything else. I know, those at the top must keep some distance if they are to do their jobs effectively, but Rumsfeld really takes that to new levels. It goes back to the other Rummy thread, he's a great administrator and shitty leader of people.
--PunkDavid
_________________ Unfortunately, at the Dawning of the Age of Aquarius, the Flower Children jerked off and went back to sleep.
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:46 pm Posts: 9617 Location: Medford, Oregon Gender: Male
CommonWord wrote:
ElPhantasmo wrote:
I don't think it's a non-issue to those who have lost family members in Iraq either, but then again, who cares what they think, right?
With all due respect, quit being such a fucking drama queen. Putting words in people's mouths, especially those people you disagree with, discredits a majority of what you say.
I'm aware of a smarter ElPhantasmo, and I may personally vouch that he exits, and could possibly offer something better than assumptive euphamisms.
Thanks James, that means a lot to me.
And for the record:
Quote:
Military families told the Stars and Stripes newspaper, which first carried the story, that the machine-signed letters reflected a lack of respect for the losses the families had suffered.
"To me it's an insult, not only as someone who lost a loved one but also as someone who served in Iraq," Army Spc. Ivan Medina whose brother Irving was killed in Iraq this summer, told the newspaper.
So you see, it is an issue to them, despite it being a "non-issue" for you and several others. But again, thanks for letting me know that my concern and empathy for families who have lost loved ones in Iraq makes me a "fucking drama queen."
_________________ Deep below the dunes I roved Past the rows, past the rows Beside the acacias freshly in bloom I sent men to their doom
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum