WND Exclusive Commentary A devil food is turning our kids into homosexuals
Posted: December 12, 2006
1:00 a.m. Eastern

There's a slow poison out there that's severely damaging our children and threatening to tear apart our culture. The ironic part is, it's a "health food," one of our most popular.

Now, I'm a health-food guy, a fanatic who seldom allows anything into his kitchen unless it's organic. I state my bias here just so you'll know I'm not anti-health food.

The dangerous food I'm speaking of is soy. Soybean products are feminizing, and they're all over the place. You can hardly escape them anymore.

I have nothing against an occasional soy snack. Soy is nutritious and contains lots of good things. Unfortunately, when you eat or drink a lot of soy stuff, you're also getting substantial quantities of estrogens.

Estrogens are female hormones. If you're a woman, you're flooding your system with a substance it can't handle in surplus. If you're a man, you're suppressing your masculinity and stimulating your "female side," physically and mentally.

In fetal development, the default is being female. All humans (even in old age) tend toward femininity. The main thing that keeps men from diverging into the female pattern is testosterone, and testosterone is suppressed by an excess of estrogen.

If you're a grownup, you're already developed, and you're able to fight off some of the damaging effects of soy. Babies aren't so fortunate. Research is now showing that when you feed your baby soy formula, you're giving him or her the equivalent of five birth control pills a day. A baby's endocrine system just can't cope with that kind of massive assault, so some damage is inevitable. At the extreme, the damage can be fatal.

Soy is feminizing, and commonly leads to a decrease in the size of the penis, sexual confusion and homosexuality. That's why most of the medical (not socio-spiritual) blame for today's rise in homosexuality must fall upon the rise in soy formula and other soy products. (Most babies are bottle-fed during some part of their infancy, and one-fourth of them are getting soy milk!) Homosexuals often argue that their homosexuality is inborn because "I can't remember a time when I wasn't homosexual." No, homosexuality is always deviant. But now many of them can truthfully say that they can't remember a time when excess estrogen wasn't influencing them.

Doctors used to hope soy would reduce hot flashes, prevent cancer and heart disease, and save millions in the Third World from starvation. That was before they knew much about long-term soy use. Now we know it's a classic example of a cure that's worse than the disease. For example, if your baby gets colic from cow's milk, do you switch him to soy milk? Don't even think about it. His phytoestrogen level will jump to 20 times normal. If he is a she, brace yourself for watching her reach menarche as young as seven, robbing her of years of childhood. If he is a boy, it's far worse: He may not reach puberty till much later than normal.

Research in 2000 showed that a soy-based diet at any age can lead to a weak thyroid, which commonly produces heart problems and excess fat. Could this explain the dramatic increase in obesity today?

Recent research on rats shows testicular atrophy, infertility and uterus hypertrophy (enlargement). This helps explain the infertility epidemic and the sudden growth in fertility clinics. But alas, by the time a soy-damaged infant has grown to adulthood and wants to marry, it's too late to get fixed by a fertility clinic.

Worse, there's now scientific evidence that estrogen ingredients in soy products may be boosting the rapidly rising incidence of leukemia in children. In the latest year we have numbers for, new cases in the U.S. jumped 27 percent. In one year!

There's also a serious connection between soy and cancer in adults – especially breast cancer. That's why the governments of Israel, the UK, France and New Zealand are already cracking down hard on soy.

In sad contrast, 60 percent of the refined foods in U.S. supermarkets now contain soy. Worse, soy use may double in the next few years because (last I heard) the out-of-touch medicrats in the FDA hierarchy are considering allowing manufacturers of cereal, energy bars, fake milk, fake yogurt, etc., to claim that "soy prevents cancer." It doesn't.

P.S.: Soy sauce is fine. Unlike soy milk, it's perfectly safe because it's fermented, which changes its molecular structure. Miso, natto and tempeh are also OK, but avoid tofu.

Related special offer:

"The What's-for-Dinner Cookbook"

Oh, thank god. I thought at first you meant Devils Food.



I mean, that stuff is delicious.

wtf mate

DOWN WITH HOMO SOY!!!

so does the food turn the person when they are balls deep in the homosexual?

the thread title seems almost impossible

*into

I guess I'm even more of a girly man now after downing all of that soy nog this time of year.

link?

http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.a ... E_ID=53327

How about this for a slogan? "WND--only one letter away from WMD."

laugh out loud

Japaneses eat a lot of soy...they also have small pe...

Whatever, just don't feed me what those Indians are eating!

http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/vie ... hp?t=56190

Hi, Nick.

That goat has devil eyes.



Maybe it's gay.

But i have to agree soy is overrated but its great for the brazilian economy

How does Brazil compare to say the U.S. or Europe in terms of farm subsides? Have Brazilians figured out how to farm without handouts from the government?

Yes!! we dont have subsides in our soy, cattle, oranges, sugar cane,etc. For example, now Brazil produces 50% of all the orange juice consumed in the world, Florida is shitty compared to us.

Some of those subsides are ridiculous, for example, a dutch cow earns about 2 dollars per day from their gov.

Do you have subsidies on any of your crops? Grains or whatnot? Pretty awesome if you don't have any. For instance, in the U.S. farmers in certain regions are paid not to produce rice or some other such silly thing. The idea is that rice should be grown in climates with more rainfall, but I don't see why the price of water wouldn't be higher or its use more restricted.

You'd expect that if Brazilian farmers could get by without subsidies, so could the U.S. and European farmers. Considering that in the U.S., farming accounts for 1 percent of the economic output, its pretty insane that it gets so much Federal funding.

Oh, and what good is the WTO if it allows developed countries to continue these horrendous policies?

are you calling me a shitty cow working below minimum wage?