Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:47 am Posts: 46000 Location: Reasonville
In the world of conservative news nerds, calling someone "Paris Hilton" is an insult. That "slur" has now been hurled by FOX News at grey-haired golden boy Anderson Cooper.
In the latest issue of Television Week, the right-leaning cable net ran a two-page ad with the screaming headline: "MEET THE PARIS HILTON OF TELEVISION NEWS." Anderson isn't pictured or named, but there's a photo, taken from behind, of a slim, grey-haired man in a suit.
The ad also says that "Anderson" is "style over substance" and a "media darling." But here's the kicker: "He still gets beat EVERY NIGHT BY ... Greta Van Susteren." Ouch.
The spat erupted last week when Cooper took a shot at FOX News for hyping Insight magazine's incorrect story that Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama had attended a radical Islamic school as a child in Indonesia. "Others are reporting the heat. We are sticking to the facts," Cooper said at the time.
You call FOX inaccurate, they call you Paris Hilton. So there!
_________________ No matter how dark the storm gets overhead They say someone's watching from the calm at the edge What about us when we're down here in it? We gotta watch our backs
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:14 am Posts: 37778 Location: OmaGOD!!! Gender: Male
Greta Van Susteren calling anyone "style over substance" is one of the most laughable things I've ever heard. Does she actually report on news that doesn't involve dead children?
_________________ Unfortunately, at the Dawning of the Age of Aquarius, the Flower Children jerked off and went back to sleep.
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:53 pm Posts: 20537 Location: The City Of Trees
LeninFlux wrote:
Let's check the ratings from yesterday (1/30/07)
Be prepared to hear the "what's popular isn't always best" comments.
ceeb, when I first saw that image, I first thought that they were calling Greta the Paris Hilton of TV news. That would have actually made some sense to me.
Be prepared to hear the "what's popular isn't always best" comments.
ceeb, when I first saw that image, I first thought that they were calling Greta the Paris Hilton of TV news. That would have actually made some sense to me.
Fair enough. Personally, I have no interest in Van Sustern's show. However, based on the ratings, FoxNews' assertion is accurate.
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:53 pm Posts: 20537 Location: The City Of Trees
LeninFlux wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
LeninFlux wrote:
Let's check the ratings from yesterday (1/30/07)
Be prepared to hear the "what's popular isn't always best" comments.
ceeb, when I first saw that image, I first thought that they were calling Greta the Paris Hilton of TV news. That would have actually made some sense to me.
Fair enough. Personally, I have no interest in Van Sustern's show. However, based on the ratings, FoxNews' assertion is accurate.
Well, given the ratings figures themselves, why does Fox need to excessively bash someone when he's down?
Personally, I find the whole cable news war entertaining. It's like the competition is turning into a sports event between two hated rivals.
Be prepared to hear the "what's popular isn't always best" comments.
ceeb, when I first saw that image, I first thought that they were calling Greta the Paris Hilton of TV news. That would have actually made some sense to me.
Fair enough. Personally, I have no interest in Van Sustern's show. However, based on the ratings, FoxNews' assertion is accurate.
Well, given the ratings figures themselves, why does Fox need to excessively bash someone when he's down?
Personally, I find the whole cable news war entertaining. It's like the competition is turning into a sports event between two hated rivals.
I think they are lashing out at the constant drumbeat of "Fox is the White House's propaganda machine." While I would agree with someone who said that FoxNews has more conservative than liberal pundits, I think they are far from being an adjunct to the Bush Administration. I think they sum it up pretty well when they say they give the Bush Administration the "benefit of the doubt." I'd rather that then the mindless bashing that MSNBC pours on night after night.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 7:19 pm Posts: 39068 Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA Gender: Male
Clearly the best measure of a quality news program is the willingness of Americans to watch it.
_________________ "Though some may think there should be a separation between art/music and politics, it should be reinforced that art can be a form of nonviolent protest." - e.v.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:14 am Posts: 37778 Location: OmaGOD!!! Gender: Male
I think we've already established that liberals watch and listen to conservatives for teh lulz, and conservatives watch and listen to conservatives because they like hearing their opinions echoed back at them from an electronic box.
_________________ Unfortunately, at the Dawning of the Age of Aquarius, the Flower Children jerked off and went back to sleep.
Anderson Cooper is...it's hard to pin down...but there's something about him that's really annoying. He kind of reminds me of some college kid on a local access channel reading the news.
I think I'll "opt out" of the 10 o'clock hour.
_________________ For your sake I hope heaven and hell are really there but I wouldn't hold my breath
Anderson Cooper is...it's hard to pin down...but there's something about him that's really annoying. He kind of reminds me of some college kid on a local access channel reading the news.
I think I'll "opt out" of the 10 o'clock hour.
he's the Dane Cook of tv journalism, only not THAT annoying.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum