Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:08 pm Posts: 15892 Location: a wee green island Gender: Male
Peeps wrote:
brainofpea wrote:
It's bad. Not as bad as invading a country for it's oil, and killing hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians along the way though.
this is perhaps the biggest misconception.
if we did go there for their oil, why are we still dependent on OPEC and why is gas now $3 a gallon?
Because it suits Bush and his Arab allies to keep the prices up for their own ends.
If it's the case that the US and their allies are their there purely for democratic ends, then why is Zimbabwe, North Korea, China, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait not getting the same treatment?
Of course, they won't bother with Arabia because Bush is too closely linked in business ties with the Arabian royal family to think of such a thing.
China is just too big to contemplate going anywhere near them.
It's bad. Not as bad as invading a country for it's oil, and killing hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians along the way though.
this is perhaps the biggest misconception.
if we did go there for their oil, why are we still dependent on OPEC and why is gas now $3 a gallon?
Because it suits Bush and his Arab allies to keep the prices up for their own ends.
If it's the case that the US and their allies are their there purely for democratic ends, then why is Zimbabwe, North Korea, China, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait not getting the same treatment?
Of course, they won't bother with Arabia because Bush is too closely linked in business ties with the Arabian royal family to think of such a thing.
China is just too big to contemplate going anywhere near them.
And Nortrh Korea and Zimbabwe don't produce oil.
It really is that simple.
If that's the case, why has China gotten all the big oil contracts from Iraq? If there was such a big conspiracy, wouldn't they want to sell it Americans for an inflated price instead of the Chinese? Bush's 'big oil' conpirators can't make any money if they have no supply.
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:08 pm Posts: 15892 Location: a wee green island Gender: Male
broken iris wrote:
brainofpea wrote:
Peeps wrote:
brainofpea wrote:
It's bad. Not as bad as invading a country for it's oil, and killing hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians along the way though.
this is perhaps the biggest misconception.
if we did go there for their oil, why are we still dependent on OPEC and why is gas now $3 a gallon?
Because it suits Bush and his Arab allies to keep the prices up for their own ends.
If it's the case that the US and their allies are their there purely for democratic ends, then why is Zimbabwe, North Korea, China, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait not getting the same treatment?
Of course, they won't bother with Arabia because Bush is too closely linked in business ties with the Arabian royal family to think of such a thing.
China is just too big to contemplate going anywhere near them.
And Nortrh Korea and Zimbabwe don't produce oil.
It really is that simple.
If that's the case, why has China gotten all the big oil contracts from Iraq? If there was such a big conspiracy, wouldn't they want to sell it Americans for an inflated price instead of the Chinese? Bush's 'big oil' conpirators can't make any money if they have no supply.
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 8:14 pm Posts: 15317 Location: Concord, NC Gender: Male
brainofpea wrote:
broken iris wrote:
brainofpea wrote:
Peeps wrote:
brainofpea wrote:
It's bad. Not as bad as invading a country for it's oil, and killing hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians along the way though.
this is perhaps the biggest misconception.
if we did go there for their oil, why are we still dependent on OPEC and why is gas now $3 a gallon?
Because it suits Bush and his Arab allies to keep the prices up for their own ends.
If it's the case that the US and their allies are their there purely for democratic ends, then why is Zimbabwe, North Korea, China, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait not getting the same treatment?
Of course, they won't bother with Arabia because Bush is too closely linked in business ties with the Arabian royal family to think of such a thing.
China is just too big to contemplate going anywhere near them.
And Nortrh Korea and Zimbabwe don't produce oil.
It really is that simple.
If that's the case, why has China gotten all the big oil contracts from Iraq? If there was such a big conspiracy, wouldn't they want to sell it Americans for an inflated price instead of the Chinese? Bush's 'big oil' conpirators can't make any money if they have no supply.
I don't quite understand your post.
why? are you retarded or something
_________________ 255 characters are nowhere near enough
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:08 pm Posts: 15892 Location: a wee green island Gender: Male
PeopleMyAge wrote:
brainofpea wrote:
broken iris wrote:
brainofpea wrote:
Peeps wrote:
brainofpea wrote:
It's bad. Not as bad as invading a country for it's oil, and killing hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians along the way though.
this is perhaps the biggest misconception.
if we did go there for their oil, why are we still dependent on OPEC and why is gas now $3 a gallon?
Because it suits Bush and his Arab allies to keep the prices up for their own ends.
If it's the case that the US and their allies are their there purely for democratic ends, then why is Zimbabwe, North Korea, China, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait not getting the same treatment?
Of course, they won't bother with Arabia because Bush is too closely linked in business ties with the Arabian royal family to think of such a thing.
China is just too big to contemplate going anywhere near them.
And Nortrh Korea and Zimbabwe don't produce oil.
It really is that simple.
If that's the case, why has China gotten all the big oil contracts from Iraq? If there was such a big conspiracy, wouldn't they want to sell it Americans for an inflated price instead of the Chinese? Bush's 'big oil' conpirators can't make any money if they have no supply.
If that's the case, why has China gotten all the big oil contracts from Iraq? If there was such a big conspiracy, wouldn't they want to sell it Americans for an inflated price instead of the Chinese? Bush's 'big oil' conpirators can't make any money if they have no supply.
I don't quite understand your post.
why? are you retarded or something
It doesn't make any sense to me.
Not my most clearly written post. What I was saying is that, if the iWreck war was about oil, then why aren't the American oil & services companies getting the large contracts? Haliburton may have contracts for rebuilding, but only as long as our soldiers are there. Once we leave, hopefully starting tomorrow, the Chinese take over. Tell me how that's in Bush's grand plan?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
