Red Mosquito http://archive.theskyiscrape.com/ |
|
Global warming http://archive.theskyiscrape.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=6894 |
Page 80 of 81 |
Author: | turned2black [ Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Global warming |
It's not really a joke, astroid deflection is now NASA's top priority. As of now, an astroid 2 miles wide has a 1:250 chance on entering our keyhole in 2036. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunguska_event |
Author: | cutuphalfdead [ Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Global warming |
turned2black wrote: It's not really a joke, astroid deflection is now NASA's top priority. As of now, an astroid 2 miles wide has a 1:250 chance on entering our keyhole in 2036. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunguska_event Another Tunguska would simply wipe out Milwaukee or something. I'm ok with that. |
Author: | Rebar [ Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Global warming |
cutuphalfdead wrote: Rebar wrote: cutuphalfdead wrote: Rebar wrote: Man I hope that is true. Unlike many RMer's, I have a plan and a stockpile if this happens. I have a plan as well. It's simply to find you. Sorry friend, but unless you want to share the dog's food, my Costco 1 year emergency food kit doesn't factor in for another human being. Some friend you are. Reid and I will perish elsewhere. Oh, about that... ok you can come too. |
Author: | Skitch Patterson [ Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Global warming |
Reid and CHUD officially have a no strings attached invite to my |
Author: | malice [ Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Global warming |
turned2black wrote: It's not really a joke, astroid deflection is now NASA's top priority. As of now, an astroid 2 miles wide has a 1:250 chance on entering our keyhole in 2036. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunguska_event I think you should start a thread about it |
Author: | turned2black [ Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Global warming |
cutuphalfdead wrote: turned2black wrote: It's not really a joke, astroid deflection is now NASA's top priority. As of now, an astroid 2 miles wide has a 1:250 chance on entering our keyhole in 2036. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunguska_event Another Tunguska would simply wipe out Milwaukee or something. I'm ok with that. The Tunguska comet would have been about 1/200th the size of this one. At the very least, it would wipe out half the U.S., but the nuclear winter that would follow would be the real problem. |
Author: | Rebar [ Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Global warming |
That's ok, I have a large supply of these. |
Author: | cutuphalfdead [ Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Global warming |
Skitch Patterson wrote: Reid and CHUD officially have a no strings attached invite to my You're a good man, and thorough. |
Author: | cutuphalfdead [ Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Global warming |
Rebar wrote: cutuphalfdead wrote: Rebar wrote: cutuphalfdead wrote: Rebar wrote: Man I hope that is true. Unlike many RMer's, I have a plan and a stockpile if this happens. I have a plan as well. It's simply to find you. Sorry friend, but unless you want to share the dog's food, my Costco 1 year emergency food kit doesn't factor in for another human being. Some friend you are. Reid and I will perish elsewhere. Oh, about that... ok you can come too. Thanks, pal. I won't let you down. |
Author: | Owl_Farmer [ Tue Aug 21, 2012 1:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Global warming |
Asteroids don't kill people. Nuclear winter kills people. |
Author: | Rebar [ Tue Sep 04, 2012 11:45 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Global warming |
Another year down, another asteroid dodged, amirite rafa? |
Author: | McParadigm [ Tue Sep 04, 2012 1:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Global warming |
I'm just glad that, at the end of the day, Washington understands that my immediate wants and conveniences are far more important than anything that will ever happen to my kids. |
Author: | turned2black [ Tue Sep 04, 2012 2:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Global warming |
NASA has us covered! |
Author: | McParadigm [ Tue Sep 04, 2012 2:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Global warming |
They're gonna turn it into Pacman? |
Author: | turned2black [ Thu Sep 13, 2012 4:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Global warming |
Asteroid to fly by Earth Thursday: How to watch online http://www.foxnews.com/science/2012/09/ ... ch-online/ |
Author: | thodoks [ Thu Sep 13, 2012 4:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Global warming |
i'm pretty sure there is no fraud |
Author: | cutuphalfdead [ Thu Sep 13, 2012 4:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Global warming |
I know there is no Maude. |
Author: | corduroy_blazer [ Sat Dec 08, 2012 5:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
$úñ_DëV|L wrote: I don't think there is any way that scientists have proven or can prove that humans are responsible for global climate change, or that global climate change is going to have a significant effect. This is from 2005. I wonder if you've changed your mind at all. |
Author: | Man in Black [ Sat Dec 08, 2012 5:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
corduroy_blazer wrote: $úñ_DëV|L wrote: I don't think there is any way that scientists have proven or can prove that humans are responsible for global climate change, or that global climate change is going to have a significant effect. This is from 2005. I wonder if you've changed your mind at all. He might show you this graph: Although, I'm sure, given that you are our resident intellectual, you'll quickly debunk it. |
Author: | McParadigm [ Sat Dec 08, 2012 3:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Man in Black wrote: corduroy_blazer wrote: $úñ_DëV|L wrote: I don't think there is any way that scientists have proven or can prove that humans are responsible for global climate change, or that global climate change is going to have a significant effect. This is from 2005. I wonder if you've changed your mind at all. He might show you this graph: Although, I'm sure, given that you are our resident intellectual, you'll quickly debunk it. Perfect example of the issues that arise when relying on news and blog sites for information about any topic. Information gets diluted to the point of info graphics and 5 paragraph posts...which is a necessity of the format, but nevertheless destructive to overall discussion. There's no better way to be sure you don't know much about any large-scale issue than to rely on the news to inform you, I think. That's not a dismissal of news agency work...just a note about the scale of those topics and the realities of that particular form of media. A few of these discuss the issue the graphic is attempting to display in full, while the rest include sections or comments related to addressing it. http://www.pnas.org/content/108/29/11790.short http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2012/2012GL052730.shtml http://iprc.soest.hawaii.edu/users/yqwang/RCM_REVIEW03.pdf http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00704-012-0687-x?LI=true#page-1 http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-chapter2.pdf |
Page 80 of 81 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |