Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:47 am Posts: 46000 Location: Reasonville
40/60
_________________ No matter how dark the storm gets overhead They say someone's watching from the calm at the edge What about us when we're down here in it? We gotta watch our backs
_________________ "Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires." -- John Steinbeck
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:14 am Posts: 37778 Location: OmaGOD!!! Gender: Male
homersheineken wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
I guess I'm leading right now with 91.67%?
Some of those, like #27, I didn't see why it was a part of the test.
Yeah I didn't get why that one was on there either.
Pretty much all of the economics questions near the end seemed out of place, IMO. I think I got 24 out of the first 25 right, and then 5 wrong in teh second half.
_________________ Unfortunately, at the Dawning of the Age of Aquarius, the Flower Children jerked off and went back to sleep.
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:52 pm Posts: 10620 Location: Chicago, IL Gender: Male
I scored a 53 out of 60 -- with 6 out of the 7 that I missed coming in the last 12 questions. I also missed the one about what Aristotle, Plato, Socrates, and Acquinas would all agree on. I basically suck at economic-policy questions.
I'm an Australian living in the US for a bit over 2 years - so not too surprised that most of my incorrect answers were in the first 30 questions.
I actually find the comments that the economic ones weren't really applicable to a civics test interesting. Not because I completely disagree, but because I think that many are still as relevant as some of the questions from other areas (historical, philosphical) that seemed to only have a tenuous connection as well. It seems people were probably inclined to feel bias towards the relevance of those areas they were most strong in answering. I guess if you know a topic well, you can see how it may still be relevant to one's broader civics knowledge. I'm clearly guilty of this myself, as the economic stuff was stronger for me.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:01 am Posts: 19477 Location: Brooklyn NY
48 out of 60
_________________
LittleWing sometime in July 2007 wrote:
Unfortunately, it's so elementary, and the big time investors behind the drive in the stock market aren't so stupid. This isn't the false economy of 2000.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum