Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:01 am Posts: 19477 Location: Brooklyn NY
Justify it, people. Not looking to talk trash here, just speak your mind.
_________________
LittleWing sometime in July 2007 wrote:
Unfortunately, it's so elementary, and the big time investors behind the drive in the stock market aren't so stupid. This isn't the false economy of 2000.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:01 am Posts: 19477 Location: Brooklyn NY
You know me, I don't care about "brown people."
_________________
LittleWing sometime in July 2007 wrote:
Unfortunately, it's so elementary, and the big time investors behind the drive in the stock market aren't so stupid. This isn't the false economy of 2000.
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 1:54 am Posts: 7189 Location: CA
glorified_version wrote:
You know me, I don't care about "brown people."
Its okay, as a liberal, you can't help it.
The whole "Country First" business, that seems to preclude foreign intervention in issues that aren't a major threat to our foreign interests, doesn't it?
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:01 am Posts: 19477 Location: Brooklyn NY
I doubt McCain would offer much reform in that area, I know it's his platform to end subsidies and I agree with it (one of the few areas I agree with McCain); I just have a hard time seeing that happen with predicted major Democratic victories in the Congress.
And I'm sure there'll be more important things to accomplish with another right-wing executive branch, like helping to overturn Roe v. Wade and setting up new laws to prosecute all those terrified and pregnant 16 year-olds that ignore the ban.
_________________
LittleWing sometime in July 2007 wrote:
Unfortunately, it's so elementary, and the big time investors behind the drive in the stock market aren't so stupid. This isn't the false economy of 2000.
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 1:54 am Posts: 7189 Location: CA
glorified_version wrote:
I doubt McCain would offer much reform in that area, I know it's his platform to end subsidies and I agree with it (one of the few areas I agree with McCain); I just have a hard time seeing that happen with predicted major Democratic victories in the Congress.
And I'm sure there'll be more important things to accomplish with another right-wing executive branch, like helping to overturn Roe v. Wade and setting up new laws to prosecute all those terrified and pregnant 16 year-olds that ignore the ban.
I don't know how consistent Bush has been in his opposition to subsidies, but he clearly hasn't gotten very far with the legislature in this regard. So the Democrats can get a veto proof majority on an agricultural bill but cave in to war funding and domestic survelliance? Seems like no one has their priorities in line.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:01 am Posts: 19477 Location: Brooklyn NY
Republican White House, Democratic Congress? Surely there'll be no deadlock.
_________________
LittleWing sometime in July 2007 wrote:
Unfortunately, it's so elementary, and the big time investors behind the drive in the stock market aren't so stupid. This isn't the false economy of 2000.
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:51 pm Posts: 14534 Location: Mesa,AZ
glorified_version wrote:
I doubt McCain would offer much reform in that area, I know it's his platform to end subsidies and I agree with it (one of the few areas I agree with McCain); I just have a hard time seeing that happen with predicted major Democratic victories in the Congress.
And I'm sure there'll be more important things to accomplish with another right-wing executive branch, like helping to overturn Roe v. Wade and setting up new laws to prosecute all those terrified and pregnant 16 year-olds that ignore the ban.
"Predicted Democratic victories in the Congress" is why I might vote for McCain. Nothing better than having a different party run the Executive and Legislative branches.
_________________
John Adams wrote:
In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a congress.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:01 am Posts: 19477 Location: Brooklyn NY
But both of you voted Republican across the board in '00 and '04? City council positions don't count.
_________________
LittleWing sometime in July 2007 wrote:
Unfortunately, it's so elementary, and the big time investors behind the drive in the stock market aren't so stupid. This isn't the false economy of 2000.
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:53 pm Posts: 20537 Location: The City Of Trees
$úñ_DëV|L wrote:
"Predicted Democratic victories in the Congress" is why I might vote for McCain. Nothing better than having a different party run the Executive and Legislative branches.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:01 am Posts: 19477 Location: Brooklyn NY
I'm honestly not seeing very good justifications.
_________________
LittleWing sometime in July 2007 wrote:
Unfortunately, it's so elementary, and the big time investors behind the drive in the stock market aren't so stupid. This isn't the false economy of 2000.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:01 am Posts: 19477 Location: Brooklyn NY
Not at all. I'm positively terrified. It would be different if you were an unabashed right-winger but their positions aren't exactly aligned with yours in many ways at all.
_________________
LittleWing sometime in July 2007 wrote:
Unfortunately, it's so elementary, and the big time investors behind the drive in the stock market aren't so stupid. This isn't the false economy of 2000.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:01 am Posts: 19477 Location: Brooklyn NY
If it's a matter of "individual liberty" though, I guess Obama is really looking to ruin it by increasing the capital gains tax, right?
_________________
LittleWing sometime in July 2007 wrote:
Unfortunately, it's so elementary, and the big time investors behind the drive in the stock market aren't so stupid. This isn't the false economy of 2000.
Some reasons may be; 1. You like McCain's foreign policy more. You may feel that McCain offers a more known commodity regarding foreign affairs than Obama. You may not always like what you get but have a good sense of what you are going to get. You don't like the wildcard that Obama offers. 2. You want to keep the tax cuts. 3. You like McCain's agriculture policies more. You'd like to see and end to subsidies and will settle for a lessening to subsidies. 4. You don't like Obama's protectionist trade stance regarding NAFTA. You don't like what this foreshadows for trade policies in general. 5. You are more confident that McCain's loose gun approach will be more effective in bringing change to Washington than Obama's approach. McCain has a proven record of being able to work with both parties. You are unswayed by Obama's ability to even win over his own party. 6. You like taking care of your own healthcare needs.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum