Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:14 am Posts: 37778 Location: OmaGOD!!! Gender: Male
Just a little PSA for anyone who has concerns about the integrity of teh vote count from electronic voting machines or otherwise.
One of the errors that has been noted with voting machines is that people who choose a straight party ticket (where that choice is available) sometimes have their votes miscounted or not counted at all. And take not in teh story about the weird NORTH CAROLINA rule where you have to vote for president separately anyway.
Take the extra one minute to individually choose each candidate for each office on your ballot. It's a quick and easy way to make (more) sure that your votes will count.
_________________ Unfortunately, at the Dawning of the Age of Aquarius, the Flower Children jerked off and went back to sleep.
Post subject: Re: DON'T VOTE STRAIGHT PARTY TICKET
Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2008 1:27 am
too drunk to moderate properly
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 7:19 pm Posts: 39068 Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA Gender: Male
But what about the Obama Straight Flip?
_________________ "Though some may think there should be a separation between art/music and politics, it should be reinforced that art can be a form of nonviolent protest." - e.v.
I'm not convinced it's an issue. When I voted, every person being handed a ballot was reminded that "President is SEPARATE from the straight ticket." The ballot is even set up (with President at the top, and straight ticket under that) to reflect it. I can't believe it's going to be as big a problem as people claim. The ballot's been that way for 50 years and no one cared until now, when it might actually matter in the national election.
_________________ "Though some may think there should be a separation between art/music and politics, it should be reinforced that art can be a form of nonviolent protest." - e.v.
Post subject: Re: DON'T VOTE STRAIGHT PARTY TICKET
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 5:05 pm
Unthought Known
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 1:54 am Posts: 7189 Location: CA
A friend of my girlfriend works for Vote Trust USA, which is pushing for electronic voting machines. They argue that they make voting more secretive and secure or some such, but I can't help but assume that they are heavily funded by Diebold and other vendors. What benefits of useability do electronic voting machines have over paper ballots? Do these benefits justify the money required?
I'm not convinced it's an issue. When I voted, every person being handed a ballot was reminded that "President is SEPARATE from the straight ticket." The ballot is even set up (with President at the top, and straight ticket under that) to reflect it. I can't believe it's going to be as big a problem as people claim. The ballot's been that way for 50 years and no one cared until now, when it might actually matter in the national election.
Are you saying black people are stupid?
_________________ It takes a big man to make a threat on the internet.
_________________ "Though some may think there should be a separation between art/music and politics, it should be reinforced that art can be a form of nonviolent protest." - e.v.
ok, 2 things: - man you guys are voting for way too many things at once (neither in France or the UK we vote for national/regional/local/referendum elections all at once. rarely even 2 combined. they have different functions, with different issues, and mixing the voting means mixing the issues rather than making them clearer.) - why are most of those posts elected? either they should have nothing to do with politics (judges? Attorney? Auditor?) or should be selected by whoever is elected to run the main office (in the same way as the cabinet is). Now I can see some advantages in more direct elections in involving people more, but that advantage is lost by the 1st point..too much at the same time to give people (and candidates) time to make informed choices.
_________________ 2009 was a great year for PJ gigs looking forward to 2010 and: Columbus, Noblesville, Cleveland, Buffalo, Dublin, Belfast, London, Nijmegen, Berlin, Arras, Werchter, Lisbon, some more US (wherever is the Anniversary show/a birthday show)
ok, 2 things: - man you guys are voting for way too many things at once (neither in France or the UK we vote for national/regional/local/referendum elections all at once. rarely even 2 combined. they have different functions, with different issues, and mixing the voting means mixing the issues rather than making them clearer.) - why are most of those posts elected? either they should have nothing to do with politics (judges? Attorney? Auditor?) or should be selected by whoever is elected to run the main office (in the same way as the cabinet is). Now I can see some advantages in more direct elections in involving people more, but that advantage is lost by the 1st point..too much at the same time to give people (and candidates) time to make informed choices.
I agree that most of the offices should not be elected in the first place, but it is far cheaper to have one "general election" rather than multiple elections during the year. Plus, voter turnout is much higher the more important offices are up for election (president, congress, governor).
_________________ Unfortunately, at the Dawning of the Age of Aquarius, the Flower Children jerked off and went back to sleep.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
