Board index » Word on the Street... » News & Debate




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10584 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 530  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: 2008 Presidential Election
PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 9:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 Profile

Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 8:04 pm
Posts: 5300
Location: upstate NY
Gender: Male
I realize its a little early to be thinking about this, but its somewhat diffiicult to not think about getting a new President when W is in the White House. Who would you all like to see win the Presidential Election in 2008.

My (realistic) choice would be Russ Feingold, Democratic Senator from Wisconsin. (My non-realistic choice would be Howard Zinn.) Feingold was the only Senator to vote against the Patriot Act when it was first up for a vote, and voted agasint it again with 9 other Senators this year. He's a real stand-up guy, returning his pay raises to the Treasury every year because he doesnt think its fair that Senators can vote themselves pay raises. He voted against going into Iraq, and was the first person in Washington to suggest setting a timeline to get out of there by the end of this year. He's anti-death penalty, pro-choice, and has a good record involving the environment. He's the guy that proposed the censure of the President.
Unfortunately, he is also a twice-divorced Jew, not very electable.

I don't like Hilary, because she seems to me to be way too much of a self-promoting politician.

Republicans I could deal with include McCain, and in some ways, Arlen Specter.

Who do you all like/dislike?

_________________
, yo.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 9:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:38 pm
Posts: 4412
Location: red mosquito
I still want to see a Kerry/McCain split-ticket. Nobody could take those two down.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 9:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Johnny Guitar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 11:02 pm
Posts: 168
Location: Stranger here than over there.
Jeb 08 - he's taller.

_________________
toot toot bleet toot, bleet toot toot (Jones' keyboard sound from the 1980 tour versions of In The Evening)


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 9:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Resident Frat Dick
 Profile

Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 7:50 pm
Posts: 10229
Location: WA (aka Waaaaaaaahhhh!!)
Gender: Male
Ahnold.

_________________
Image

9/16/96, 7/21/98, 7/22/98, 11/5/00, 11/6/00, 12/5/02, 12/8/02, 12/9/02, 5/30/03, 10/22/03, 9/24/04, 3/18/05, 9/1/05, 9/2/05, 7/23/06, 9/21/09, 9/22/09, 9/26/09, 9/25/11


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: 2008 Presidential Election
PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 10:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Of Counsel
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:14 am
Posts: 37778
Location: OmaGOD!!!
Gender: Male
The Argonaut wrote:
I realize its a little early to be thinking about this, but its somewhat diffiicult to not think about getting a new President when W is in the White House. Who would you all like to see win the Presidential Election in 2008.

My (realistic) choice would be Russ Feingold, Democratic Senator from Wisconsin. (My non-realistic choice would be Howard Zinn.) Feingold was the only Senator to vote against the Patriot Act when it was first up for a vote, and voted agasint it again with 9 other Senators this year. He's a real stand-up guy, returning his pay raises to the Treasury every year because he doesnt think its fair that Senators can vote themselves pay raises. He voted against going into Iraq, and was the first person in Washington to suggest setting a timeline to get out of there by the end of this year. He's anti-death penalty, pro-choice, and has a good record involving the environment. He's the guy that proposed the censure of the President.
Unfortunately, he is also a twice-divorced Jew, not very electable.

I don't like Hilary, because she seems to me to be way too much of a self-promoting politician.

Republicans I could deal with include McCain, and in some ways, Arlen Specter.

Who do you all like/dislike?

Feingold would also be my number one choice. If people got to know what he's about, they'd love him as much as the people of Wisconsin do. Kerry got less than 50% of the vote in 2004 in Wisconsin, Feingold pulled 59%. The moderates in Wisconsin know that he's not a left-wing wacko, if he can get his TRUE message out to the rest of the country, he'd have a chance.

The list of reasons why I'll never vote for Hillary grows with each passing month it seems.

I'm growing more disenchanted with McCain, and Specter isn't going to run. He's in his late 70's and has survived cancer at least twice. McCain is almost too old at this point himself.

Bammer wrote:
Ahnold.

Not sure if you were being serious, but that's uncahnstitutionul.

_________________
Unfortunately, at the Dawning of the Age of Aquarius, the Flower Children jerked off and went back to sleep.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 10:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Unthought Known
 Profile

Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 4:49 pm
Posts: 9495
Location: Richie-Richville, Maryland
Mitt Romney

_________________
you get a lifetime, that's it.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 10:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Got Some
 YIM  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 11:40 pm
Posts: 1145
Location: Topeka,Kansas
sam brownback :lol:

_________________
Workplace Blog


xanga.com/storytime_with_s_and_m


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 10:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Got Some
 YIM  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 11:40 pm
Posts: 1145
Location: Topeka,Kansas
mrh13 wrote:
sam brownback :lol:



NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

_________________
Workplace Blog


xanga.com/storytime_with_s_and_m


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 10:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Got Some
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:35 am
Posts: 1311
Location: Lexington
tommymctom wrote:
I still want to see a Kerry/McCain split-ticket. Nobody could take those two down.


I sure as could. McCain's got my vote. I could also stomach Feingold.

I will under no circumstances vote for a ticket including any of the follwoing:
Bill Frist
Hillary Clinton
John Kerry
Tom Daschele
Joe Biden
Newt Gingrich
George Allen
Dennis Kucinich
or my current boss who will remain nameless.

_________________
punkdavid wrote:
Make sure to bring a bottle of vitriol. And wear a condom so you don't insinuate her.

--PunkDavid


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: 2008 Presidential Election
PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 10:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 12:29 am
Posts: 4598
punkdavid wrote:
The Argonaut wrote:
I realize its a little early to be thinking about this, but its somewhat diffiicult to not think about getting a new President when W is in the White House. Who would you all like to see win the Presidential Election in 2008.

My (realistic) choice would be Russ Feingold, Democratic Senator from Wisconsin. (My non-realistic choice would be Howard Zinn.) Feingold was the only Senator to vote against the Patriot Act when it was first up for a vote, and voted agasint it again with 9 other Senators this year. He's a real stand-up guy, returning his pay raises to the Treasury every year because he doesnt think its fair that Senators can vote themselves pay raises. He voted against going into Iraq, and was the first person in Washington to suggest setting a timeline to get out of there by the end of this year. He's anti-death penalty, pro-choice, and has a good record involving the environment. He's the guy that proposed the censure of the President.
Unfortunately, he is also a twice-divorced Jew, not very electable.

I don't like Hilary, because she seems to me to be way too much of a self-promoting politician.

Republicans I could deal with include McCain, and in some ways, Arlen Specter.

Who do you all like/dislike?

Feingold would also be my number one choice. If people got to know what he's about, they'd love him as much as the people of Wisconsin do. Kerry got less than 50% of the vote in 2004 in Wisconsin, Feingold pulled 59%. The moderates in Wisconsin know that he's not a left-wing wacko, if he can get his TRUE message out to the rest of the country, he'd have a chance.

The list of reasons why I'll never vote for Hillary grows with each passing month it seems.

I'm growing more disenchanted with McCain, and Specter isn't going to run. He's in his late 70's and has survived cancer at least twice. McCain is almost too old at this point himself.

Bammer wrote:
Ahnold.

Not sure if you were being serious, but that's uncahnstitutionul.


As much as I like Feingold, i think the tide would have to turn so far left in this country, and i just dont feel like that is possible.

Hillary, absolutely not, for no other reason then she would be an easy target for teh right.

Biden is running, but he is one of those lifer carbon copy senators and I think he would really have to step outside of Washington and WOW us to get the vote.

I would like to see someone come in pushing the environment, but with Iraq, and now Iran + the border issue, we can kiss any concern for the environment good bye.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 10:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Interweb Celebrity
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:47 am
Posts: 46000
Location: Reasonville
deathbyflannel wrote:
tommymctom wrote:
I still want to see a Kerry/McCain split-ticket. Nobody could take those two down.


I sure as could. McCain's got my vote. I could also stomach Feingold.

I will under no circumstances vote for a ticket including any of the follwoing:
Bill Frist
Hillary Clinton
John Kerry
Tom Daschele
Joe Biden
Newt Gingrich
George Allen
Dennis Kucinich
or my current boss who will remain nameless.


so you'd vote for nader?!

_________________
No matter how dark the storm gets overhead
They say someone's watching from the calm at the edge
What about us when we're down here in it?
We gotta watch our backs


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 11:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Got Some
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:35 am
Posts: 1311
Location: Lexington
corduroy_blazer wrote:
deathbyflannel wrote:
tommymctom wrote:
I still want to see a Kerry/McCain split-ticket. Nobody could take those two down.


I sure as could. McCain's got my vote. I could also stomach Feingold.

I will under no circumstances vote for a ticket including any of the follwoing:
Bill Frist
Hillary Clinton
John Kerry
Tom Daschele
Joe Biden
Newt Gingrich
George Allen
Dennis Kucinich
or my current boss who will remain nameless.


so you'd vote for nader?!


If my only options include the aforementioned individuals, possibly. Though thats only if I feel he has a chance of making an impact, if im throwing my vote away im throwing it Libertarian.

_________________
punkdavid wrote:
Make sure to bring a bottle of vitriol. And wear a condom so you don't insinuate her.

--PunkDavid


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 11:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Of Counsel
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:14 am
Posts: 37778
Location: OmaGOD!!!
Gender: Male
deathbyflannel wrote:
corduroy_blazer wrote:
deathbyflannel wrote:
tommymctom wrote:
I still want to see a Kerry/McCain split-ticket. Nobody could take those two down.


I sure as could. McCain's got my vote. I could also stomach Feingold.

I will under no circumstances vote for a ticket including any of the follwoing:
Bill Frist
Hillary Clinton
John Kerry
Tom Daschele
Joe Biden
Newt Gingrich
George Allen
Dennis Kucinich
or my current boss who will remain nameless.


so you'd vote for nader?!


If my only options include the aforementioned individuals, possibly. Though thats only if I feel he has a chance of making an impact, if im throwing my vote away im throwing it Libertarian.

Yeah, I pretty much agree with this sentiment. I don't know all what I'd do, but I'm reasonably sure that if Hillary is the Dem nominee, I will vote Libertarian. Arizona is a state that could conceivably go Libertarian if the GOP fucks up enough and then nominates some complete dickweed. So I wouldn't feel like I was totally throwing my vote away.

_________________
Unfortunately, at the Dawning of the Age of Aquarius, the Flower Children jerked off and went back to sleep.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: 2008 Presidential Election
PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 11:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Resident Frat Dick
 Profile

Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 7:50 pm
Posts: 10229
Location: WA (aka Waaaaaaaahhhh!!)
Gender: Male
punkdavid wrote:

Bammer wrote:
Ahnold.

Not sure if you were being serious, but that's uncahnstitutionul.

Not fah long.

_________________
Image

9/16/96, 7/21/98, 7/22/98, 11/5/00, 11/6/00, 12/5/02, 12/8/02, 12/9/02, 5/30/03, 10/22/03, 9/24/04, 3/18/05, 9/1/05, 9/2/05, 7/23/06, 9/21/09, 9/22/09, 9/26/09, 9/25/11


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: 2008 Presidential Election
PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 11:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Of Counsel
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:14 am
Posts: 37778
Location: OmaGOD!!!
Gender: Male
Bammer wrote:
punkdavid wrote:

Bammer wrote:
Ahnold.

Not sure if you were being serious, but that's uncahnstitutionul.

Not fah long.

Better hope not, my man. Remember this name: Jennifer Granholm.

_________________
Unfortunately, at the Dawning of the Age of Aquarius, the Flower Children jerked off and went back to sleep.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 12:44 am 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 2:43 am
Posts: 10694
Unfortunately, I see nothing promising on either sides. It appears that a Hillary vs. McCain matchup is in the making, and can't stand either of them. And just because they are fucking what is the wind blowin' today politicians.

On the right, there's nothing. Gulian has zero national appeal and would never win. Nobody else has any sort of name recognition.

I don't see the left sitting to pretty either. You have Hillary, who'd never win for various reasons, and then what? Kerry again? Gore? The left will have a hard time putting up someone that can shake the stigma of being a hard liberal in order to appeal to those voters that you all dread. The religious middle class.

Either way, I see the 2008 president as being wishy washy either way. Sort of another Clinton, except perhaps a little more to the right if the Republican wins. And that's something we don't need.

_________________
Its a Wonderful Life


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 12:48 am 
Offline
User avatar
Unthought Known
 Profile

Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 1:54 am
Posts: 7189
Location: CA
LittleWing wrote:
Either way, I see the 2008 president as being wishy washy either way. Sort of another Clinton, except perhaps a little more to the right if the Republican wins. And that's something we don't need.


I feel that saxaphone playing and scandals involving the definition of "is" are exactly what this country needs. :P


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 12:48 am 
Offline
User avatar
Got Some
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:35 am
Posts: 1311
Location: Lexington
LittleWing wrote:
Unfortunately, I see nothing promising on either sides. It appears that a Hillary vs. McCain matchup is in the making, and can't stand either of them. And just because they are fucking what is the wind blowin' today politicians.

Either way, I see the 2008 president as being wishy washy either way. Sort of another Clinton, except perhaps a little more to the right if the Republican wins. And that's something we don't need.


Just to play devils advocate, why shouldn't politicians mold their positions to represent the views of the voters? Is that not their purpose?

Secondly, you dont want the country leaning more the right? Really? LW?

_________________
punkdavid wrote:
Make sure to bring a bottle of vitriol. And wear a condom so you don't insinuate her.

--PunkDavid


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 12:56 am 
Offline
User avatar
Corin's Cutie/Stone's Bitch
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 12:39 am
Posts: 9940
Location: This heart of mine
Biden

_________________
Excuse merr

Sleater-Kinney, I will always <3 you! : (


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 12:57 am 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 2:43 am
Posts: 10694
simple schoolboy wrote:
LittleWing wrote:
Either way, I see the 2008 president as being wishy washy either way. Sort of another Clinton, except perhaps a little more to the right if the Republican wins. And that's something we don't need.


I feel that saxaphone playing and scandals involving the definition of "is" are exactly what this country needs. :P


I feel our country needs some backbone in the whitehouse, and not in the Bush sort of way.

Quote:
Just to play devils advocate, why shouldn't politicians mold their positions to represent the views of the voters? Is that not their purpose? - deathbyflannel


Absolutely fucking not. That is weakness. I believe that the people we elect should genuinely believe in what they represent. I believe they should be honest and genuine. To me, that is what makes a good leader. I believe that leaders should be more authoratitive than democratic. And what I mean is, we should elect them on what they believe. We should pick who represents us. Then, once they are there, they stand up for what they believe. I don't think there are too many times when a politician should say, "well guys, what do you want me to do on this issue?" If the politician doesn't represent you, well, that's why you just vote them out in the next election. I don't think I could vote for someone who was going to represent ideals that they didn't believe in.

_________________
Its a Wonderful Life


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10584 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 530  Next

Board index » Word on the Street... » News & Debate


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
It is currently Fri Nov 21, 2025 8:21 am