Board index » Word on the Street... » News & Debate




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 158 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Intent vs. Actions and Altruism
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 5:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Interweb Celebrity
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:47 am
Posts: 46000
Location: Reasonville
I barely even remember this thread.

_________________
No matter how dark the storm gets overhead
They say someone's watching from the calm at the edge
What about us when we're down here in it?
We gotta watch our backs


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Intent vs. Actions and Altruism
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 5:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar
alot of $$$
 Profile

Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 11:01 pm
Posts: 25809
Location: FTW!
Gender: Male
I barely remember you.

_________________
CrowdSurge and Ten Club will conduct further investigation into this matter.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Intent vs. Actions and Altruism
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 5:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Interweb Celebrity
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:47 am
Posts: 46000
Location: Reasonville
That's in your best self-interest.

_________________
No matter how dark the storm gets overhead
They say someone's watching from the calm at the edge
What about us when we're down here in it?
We gotta watch our backs


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Intent vs. Actions and Altruism
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 8:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Former PJ Drummer
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 5:51 am
Posts: 17078
Location: TX
Whew, I remember why I avoided this thread. Let me see if I can touch on a few points.


Self-interest is the primary motivation of human action but it is not the sole motivation. Other motivations include duty, altruism, anger, and greed.

Selfishness is not the same thing as self-interest. A selfish act is one in which a person acts in his own self-interest without concern for its effect on the self-interest of others. This is very distinct from an act of self-interest only.


As far as intent vs. actions, well first of all this should really be called intent vs. consequences. In any case, I tend to side with the deontological school which, simply put, says intent is what matters. Utilitarianism is one of the more obvious results of a teleological approach in which every action is judged by its consequences. Utilitarianism (and in fact most other teleological philosophies as well) has some significant problems when it comes to personal practical ethical systems.

_________________
George Washington wrote:
six foot twenty fucking killing for fun


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Intent vs. Actions and Altruism
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 8:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Former PJ Drummer
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 5:51 am
Posts: 17078
Location: TX
Oh, I guess I did sort of get involved but I was definitely holding back.

_________________
George Washington wrote:
six foot twenty fucking killing for fun


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Intent vs. Actions and Altruism
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 8:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar
alot of $$$
 Profile

Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 11:01 pm
Posts: 25809
Location: FTW!
Gender: Male
Buffalohed wrote:


As far as intent vs. actions, well first of all this should really be called intent vs. consequences. In any case, I tend to side with the deontological school which, simply put, says intent is what matters. Utilitarianism is one of the more obvious results of a teleological approach in which every action is judged by its consequences. Utilitarianism (and in fact most other teleological philosophies as well) has some significant problems when it comes to personal practical ethical systems.


I WAS JUST GOING TO WRITE ABOUT TELEOLOGICAL PHILOSOPHY!

_________________
CrowdSurge and Ten Club will conduct further investigation into this matter.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Intent vs. Actions and Altruism
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 8:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Former PJ Drummer
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 5:51 am
Posts: 17078
Location: TX
given2trade wrote:
Buffalohed wrote:


As far as intent vs. actions, well first of all this should really be called intent vs. consequences. In any case, I tend to side with the deontological school which, simply put, says intent is what matters. Utilitarianism is one of the more obvious results of a teleological approach in which every action is judged by its consequences. Utilitarianism (and in fact most other teleological philosophies as well) has some significant problems when it comes to personal practical ethical systems.


I WAS JUST GOING TO WRITE ABOUT TELEOLOGICAL PHILOSOPHY!

Image

_________________
George Washington wrote:
six foot twenty fucking killing for fun


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Intent vs. Actions and Altruism
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 9:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar
alot of $$$
 Profile

Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 11:01 pm
Posts: 25809
Location: FTW!
Gender: Male
I was going to put a LOL WUT pear but I thought that was too easy. Good choice, however.

_________________
CrowdSurge and Ten Club will conduct further investigation into this matter.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Intent vs. Actions and Altruism
PostPosted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Former PJ Drummer
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 5:51 am
Posts: 17078
Location: TX
someone post here

_________________
George Washington wrote:
six foot twenty fucking killing for fun


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Intent vs. Actions and Altruism
PostPosted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 11:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Got Some
 Profile

Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 11:35 pm
Posts: 1633
Location: Wales
Gender: Male
If an accident occurs....the outcome goes against the original intention. Correct? Yes. We can all understand this. But this doesn't address the issue that, as some people say, all intents are a result of self-interest. Now take the example of the 'really quick' decision mentioned by ceebs...this was determined to be a biological impulse that ultimately satisfies the body's self-interest. Correct? Yes.

But then take an 'accident' at this level - corrupted electrical wiring in the brain ( :? )...surely then the original self interest has been affected..corrupted. Obviously the 'self interest' we talk about comes from our basic instincts - survival. At an extreme level, a self harmer, is going against his basic survival needs. This results from an irregularity in the brain. Surely the realisation that some of these 'accidents', or mutations occur means that we are not perfectly programmed to always act in our own self interest. Rather, there are possibilities, that in that 'very quick moment', whereby a stranger lays unconscious on the railtrack, one of these 'accidents', 'dodgy wiring' has led us to step in and save the stranger at risk of our own lives and without contemplation of self-satisfaction, reduction of guilt.

So to summarise, if we are always self interested - this is how we are pre-programmed. But as we know, our programming has gone awry every now and again..so this must affect the preservation of the self interest....leading an open window for selfless acts.

_________________
Speaking as a child of the 90s...


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Intent vs. Actions and Altruism
PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 5:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar
statistically insignificant
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:19 pm
Posts: 25134
bump

_________________
Fortuna69 wrote:
I will continue to not understand


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Intent vs. Actions and Altruism
PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 5:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Reissued
 Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:41 pm
Posts: 23014
Location: NOT FLO-RIDIN
Gender: Male
I'm posting in this thread because I want to stay relevant

_________________
given2trade wrote:
Oh, you think I'm being douchey? Well I shall have to re-examine everything then. Thanks brah.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Intent vs. Actions and Altruism
PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 5:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Got Some
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 5:58 pm
Posts: 1259
Location: Western Masshole
Gender: Male
LittleWing wrote:
Egocentrism to does not correspond to self-interest. You're correct that people mature from a point of caring about "me" to my "family." But you're simply replacing yourself as the focal point of your self-interest with your family.

Okay, but then doesn't it no longer become "self" interest and expand to "family" interest?

_________________
Paul McCartney told me to never drop names.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Intent vs. Actions and Altruism
PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 5:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 2:43 am
Posts: 10694
dscans wrote:
LittleWing wrote:
Egocentrism to does not correspond to self-interest. You're correct that people mature from a point of caring about "me" to my "family." But you're simply replacing yourself as the focal point of your self-interest with your family.

Okay, but then doesn't it no longer become "self" interest and expand to "family" interest?


No. Your family is your self-interest. Thodoks articulates this pretty damn good in the thread he just bumped. I used to think the same way you do, and was going to express exactly what you're saying here. But Thodoks cracked my mind just enough for me to hold back from posting in that thread. After a lot of thought about how I view my family, my service in the military, and my extensive volunteerism overseas, I still ultimately conclude that Thodoks is right. I've grown outside of an ego-centric mindset that I had as a small child. I fully understand that my girlfriend and family are extremely important to me. I understand that what I did overseas benefited other people and that I cared about "orphans." But it is still in my self-interest to have this job. It's still in my self-interest to shoulder an immensely disproportionate burden to assist my girlfriend. It's still in my self-interest to help out my family as much as I can. And it everytime I visited the orphanages, or fixed up a dilapidated third world school, it was still in my self interest to do so. I decided that it was better for myself to go out and fix up soccer fields in a hellish urban slum that it was for me to sit in a nice cool air conditioned tent playing X-box. I may have gone to serve "my nation," but it was in my self-interest to do so.

_________________
Its a Wonderful Life


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Intent vs. Actions and Altruism
PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 5:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar
statistically insignificant
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:19 pm
Posts: 25134
I guess I would just say I'm trying to emphasize the distinction between thought and action/behavior. It's clear to me that thoughts (or interests, or whatever) are NOT always egocentric. But employing means and pursuing those thoughts - that is, action, the sum of which is behavior - is an act of self-interest. This is why I phrase my claim the way I do.

_________________
Fortuna69 wrote:
I will continue to not understand


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Intent vs. Actions and Altruism
PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 5:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Got Some
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 5:58 pm
Posts: 1259
Location: Western Masshole
Gender: Male
was Mickey acting in self-interest when he made his girlfriend change his flat tire?

_________________
Paul McCartney told me to never drop names.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Intent vs. Actions and Altruism
PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 5:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Reissued
 Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:41 pm
Posts: 23014
Location: NOT FLO-RIDIN
Gender: Male
Get off my train ride, bub.

_________________
given2trade wrote:
Oh, you think I'm being douchey? Well I shall have to re-examine everything then. Thanks brah.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Intent vs. Actions and Altruism
PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 6:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar
AnalLog
 Profile

Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 3:28 am
Posts: 28541
Location: PORTLAND, ME
thodoks wrote:
I guess I would just say I'm trying to emphasize the distinction between thought and action/behavior. It's clear to me that thoughts (or interests, or whatever) are NOT always egocentric. But employing means and pursuing those thoughts - that is, action, the sum of which is behavior - is an act of self-interest. This is why I phrase my claim the way I do.

i haven't read thru this thread, but i appreciate this distinction, b/c it does make it more clear what you're getting at.

as for the question posed in that other thread, again, i don't know if its in here already and will make an attempt to find it myself, where does giving your life so somebody else can live fall? how does it benefit you, if the only outcome of your "act" is your own death?

_________________
Winner, 2011 RM 'Stache Tournament


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Intent vs. Actions and Altruism
PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 6:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 2:43 am
Posts: 10694
EllisEamos wrote:
thodoks wrote:
I guess I would just say I'm trying to emphasize the distinction between thought and action/behavior. It's clear to me that thoughts (or interests, or whatever) are NOT always egocentric. But employing means and pursuing those thoughts - that is, action, the sum of which is behavior - is an act of self-interest. This is why I phrase my claim the way I do.

i haven't read thru this thread, but i appreciate this distinction, b/c it does make it more clear what you're getting at.

as for the question posed in that other thread, again, i don't know if its in here already and will make an attempt to find it myself, where does giving your life so somebody else can live fall? how does it benefit you, if the only outcome of your "act" is your own death?


"Benefit" is a subjective notion that differs from one person to the next. And it certainly doesn't make the action any less selfish.

_________________
Its a Wonderful Life


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Intent vs. Actions and Altruism
PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 6:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar
statistically insignificant
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:19 pm
Posts: 25134
EllisEamos wrote:
thodoks wrote:
I guess I would just say I'm trying to emphasize the distinction between thought and action/behavior. It's clear to me that thoughts (or interests, or whatever) are NOT always egocentric. But employing means and pursuing those thoughts - that is, action, the sum of which is behavior - is an act of self-interest. This is why I phrase my claim the way I do.

i haven't read thru this thread, but i appreciate this distinction, b/c it does make it more clear what you're getting at.

as for the question posed in that other thread, again, i don't know if its in here already and will make an attempt to find it myself, where does giving your life so somebody else can live fall? how does it benefit you, if the only outcome of your "act" is your own death?

In this case, what this tells me is that A values B's life more than he does A's (perhaps A is B's parent). When A is faced with the choice to either save his own life or that of B, he acts in a manner consistent with those preferences. So, yes, A can be said to be altruistic (or at least not be exclusively egocentric). But once A employs means to advance those interests - no matter how altruistic they may be - he is engaging in self-interested behavior, because to do otherwise would not advance A's interests.

It's a subtle distinction, and it certainly takes some hashing out.

_________________
Fortuna69 wrote:
I will continue to not understand


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 158 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

Board index » Word on the Street... » News & Debate


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
It is currently Fri Mar 29, 2024 5:53 am