Board index » Word on the Street... » News & Debate




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: US goes Singapore route re: cigarette warnings
PostPosted: Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Reissued
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 20059
Gender: Male
well, not quite Singapore (warning: graphic)

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/22/healt ... ml?_r=1&hp

Image

_________________
stop light plays its part, so I would say you've got a part


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: US goes Singapore route re: cigarette warnings
PostPosted: Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Administrator
 Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:53 pm
Posts: 20537
Location: The City Of Trees
I don't think there's any doubt that smoking is a dangerous habit. I'm curious, though, if the government could ever get away with hammering other products in the PR market as they do with tobacco.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: US goes Singapore route re: cigarette warnings
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 12:52 am 
Offline
User avatar
AnalLog
 Profile

Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 3:28 am
Posts: 28541
Location: PORTLAND, ME
Green Habit wrote:
I don't think there's any doubt that smoking is a dangerous habit. I'm curious, though, if the government could ever get away with hammering other products in the PR market as they do with tobacco.

i doubt it...

Image
Image

every 31 minutes somebody is killed by drunk driving.
every 2 minutes somebody is injured by drunk driving.

_________________
Winner, 2011 RM 'Stache Tournament


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: US goes Singapore route re: cigarette warnings
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 12:56 am 
Offline
User avatar
Former PJ Drummer
 Profile

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:32 am
Posts: 17563
EllisEamos wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
I don't think there's any doubt that smoking is a dangerous habit. I'm curious, though, if the government could ever get away with hammering other products in the PR market as they do with tobacco.

i doubt it...

Image
Image

every 31 minutes somebody is killed by drunk driving.
every 2 minutes somebody is injured by drunk driving.

The government goes after drunk driving pretty hard, so...

_________________
Quote:
The content of the video in this situation is irrelevant to the issue.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: US goes Singapore route re: cigarette warnings
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 12:59 am 
Offline
User avatar
AnalLog
 Profile

Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 3:28 am
Posts: 28541
Location: PORTLAND, ME
bart d. wrote:
EllisEamos wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
I don't think there's any doubt that smoking is a dangerous habit. I'm curious, though, if the government could ever get away with hammering other products in the PR market as they do with tobacco.

i doubt it...

Image
Image

every 31 minutes somebody is killed by drunk driving.
every 2 minutes somebody is injured by drunk driving.

The government goes after drunk driving pretty hard, so...

funny, i never noticed quite the same passion on the packaging... and let's not get into the right to bear arms.

_________________
Winner, 2011 RM 'Stache Tournament


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: US goes Singapore route re: cigarette warnings
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 1:01 am 
Offline
User avatar
Former PJ Drummer
 Profile

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:32 am
Posts: 17563
:?

_________________
Quote:
The content of the video in this situation is irrelevant to the issue.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: US goes Singapore route re: cigarette warnings
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 1:04 am 
Offline
User avatar
AnalLog
 Profile

Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 3:28 am
Posts: 28541
Location: PORTLAND, ME
bart d. wrote:
:?

my only motive the past few minutes have been to support GH's initial point.

what's your position mr. d.?

and this seems fairly common enough for your comment to be useless: http://www.northescambia.com/?p=22406

_________________
Winner, 2011 RM 'Stache Tournament


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: US goes Singapore route re: cigarette warnings
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 1:14 am 
Offline
User avatar
Unthought Known
 Profile

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:47 pm
Posts: 9282
Location: Atlanta
Gender: Male
How do we do this on one side and continue supporting the price of tobacco on the other?

_________________
Attention Phenylketonurics: Contains Phenylalanine


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: US goes Singapore route re: cigarette warnings
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 1:19 am 
Offline
User avatar
AnalLog
 Profile

Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 3:28 am
Posts: 28541
Location: PORTLAND, ME
Electromatic wrote:
How do we do this on one side and continue supporting the price of tobacco on the other?

you mean like this: http://farm.ewg.org/progdetail.php?fips ... de=tobacco

_________________
Winner, 2011 RM 'Stache Tournament


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: US goes Singapore route re: cigarette warnings
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 1:24 am 
Offline
User avatar
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 Profile

Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 8:04 pm
Posts: 5300
Location: upstate NY
Gender: Male
OK, so I accept that banning cigarettes is probably impossible.
But this is silly. It is just weird and will not be very effective. Everyone knows that cigarettes are deadly and dangerous. Everyone in the country. Everyone. This is going to have such a minimal effect on getting people to quit or on stopping people from smoking.
Go after the extraneous and deadly and overly addictive crap that's been added into cigarettes in the last few decades, instead. People will smoke no matter what. Continue and expand education programs, be aggressive in keeping cigarettes away from kids, and make the cigarettes that are available to adults as un-toxic as possible.
Also, tax the shit out of them. I'd love if no one smoked anymore. People who start smoking now, knowing everything that we do, are consciously making a decision that they know is bad. I have no problem with pulling as much money as possible out of their wallets, even if to do nothing else but to support the Medicaid program that they are often burdening.

_________________
, yo.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: US goes Singapore route re: cigarette warnings
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 1:29 am 
Offline
Pralines and Dick
 Profile

Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 8:03 am
Posts: 13555
Location: In your PANTS!
Gender: Female
The Australian government has done this for many years now. It also costs almost $20 to buy a pack of 25 cigarettes. Stores which sell cigarettes are not allowed to display them, they have to be kept in plain white cabinets with no signage except for brand, type and price and obligatory government warnings.

It's seen a decrease to the % of people who take up smoking and an increase to the % of people quitting smoking.

They've just introduced legislation to force tobacco companies to have plain white packaging which allows them only identify the brand name and type while still carrying images similar to the ones above with government health warnings. The tobacco companies are fighting this hard but it's pretty much guaranteed to be passed into law in the next month.

_________________
Owl_Farmer wrote:
Cheer up. You're not depressed, you're just a big homo.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: US goes Singapore route re: cigarette warnings
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 1:30 am 
Offline
User avatar
Red Mosquito, my libido
 Profile

Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:02 am
Posts: 91597
Location: Sector 7-G
Seems to be a bit much. I like what Argo had to say about it.

_________________
It takes a big man to make a threat on the internet.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: US goes Singapore route re: cigarette warnings
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 1:31 am 
Offline
User avatar
Administrator
 Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:53 pm
Posts: 20537
Location: The City Of Trees
bart d. wrote:
The government goes after drunk driving pretty hard, so...
Funny, I think the government could do a lot better against drunk driving.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: US goes Singapore route re: cigarette warnings
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 1:31 am 
Offline
User avatar
AnalLog
 Profile

Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 3:28 am
Posts: 28541
Location: PORTLAND, ME
The Argonaut wrote:
OK, so I accept that banning cigarettes is probably impossible.
But this is silly. It is just weird and will not be very effective. Everyone knows that cigarettes are deadly and dangerous. Everyone in the country. Everyone. This is going to have such a minimal effect on getting people to quit or on stopping people from smoking.
Go after the extraneous and deadly and overly addictive crap that's been added into cigarettes in the last few decades, instead. People will smoke no matter what. Continue and expand education programs, be aggressive in keeping cigarettes away from kids, and make the cigarettes that are available to adults as un-toxic as possible.
Also, tax the shit out of them. I'd love if no one smoked anymore. People who start smoking now, knowing everything that we do, are consciously making a decision that they know is bad. I have no problem with pulling as much money as possible out of their wallets, even if to do nothing else but to support the Medicaid program that they are often burdening.

:lol:

if you got rid of the additives they wouldn't taste as good...

_________________
Winner, 2011 RM 'Stache Tournament


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: US goes Singapore route re: cigarette warnings
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 1:33 am 
Offline
User avatar
Administrator
 Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:53 pm
Posts: 20537
Location: The City Of Trees
The Argonaut wrote:
OK, so I accept that banning cigarettes is probably impossible.
But this is silly. It is just weird and will not be very effective. Everyone knows that cigarettes are deadly and dangerous. Everyone in the country. Everyone. This is going to have such a minimal effect on getting people to quit or on stopping people from smoking.
Go after the extraneous and deadly and overly addictive crap that's been added into cigarettes in the last few decades, instead. People will smoke no matter what. Continue and expand education programs, be aggressive in keeping cigarettes away from kids, and make the cigarettes that are available to adults as un-toxic as possible.
Also, tax the shit out of them. I'd love if no one smoked anymore. People who start smoking now, knowing everything that we do, are consciously making a decision that they know is bad. I have no problem with pulling as much money as possible out of their wallets, even if to do nothing else but to support the Medicaid program that they are often burdening.
I think the end game for cigarettes is that they won't need to be banned because so few people will smoke them in the first place. It'll probably take another generation or two, but that's my guess--which, of course, is worth about as much as any other prediction.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: US goes Singapore route re: cigarette warnings
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 1:43 am 
Offline
User avatar
Red Mosquito, my libido
 Profile

Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:02 am
Posts: 91597
Location: Sector 7-G
Green Habit wrote:
The Argonaut wrote:
OK, so I accept that banning cigarettes is probably impossible.
But this is silly. It is just weird and will not be very effective. Everyone knows that cigarettes are deadly and dangerous. Everyone in the country. Everyone. This is going to have such a minimal effect on getting people to quit or on stopping people from smoking.
Go after the extraneous and deadly and overly addictive crap that's been added into cigarettes in the last few decades, instead. People will smoke no matter what. Continue and expand education programs, be aggressive in keeping cigarettes away from kids, and make the cigarettes that are available to adults as un-toxic as possible.
Also, tax the shit out of them. I'd love if no one smoked anymore. People who start smoking now, knowing everything that we do, are consciously making a decision that they know is bad. I have no problem with pulling as much money as possible out of their wallets, even if to do nothing else but to support the Medicaid program that they are often burdening.
I think the end game for cigarettes is that they won't need to be banned because so few people will smoke them in the first place. It'll probably take another generation or two, but that's my guess--which, of course, is worth about as much as any other prediction.

I can only speak for myself, but I started as a retarded teenager in high school. I knew how bad they were for me, I knew I was slowly killing myself by smoking, but I just didn't care. Any consequence seemed so far away that you feel completely immune to whatever could happen, even though your brain is telling you that's a crock of shit and you're retarded. Like most 16 year old, I felt immortal even though I knew I wasn't.

_________________
It takes a big man to make a threat on the internet.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: US goes Singapore route re: cigarette warnings
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 1:45 am 
Offline
Pralines and Dick
 Profile

Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 8:03 am
Posts: 13555
Location: In your PANTS!
Gender: Female
Beef wrote:
The Australian government has done this for many years now. It also costs almost $20 to buy a pack of 25 cigarettes. Stores which sell cigarettes are not allowed to display them, they have to be kept in plain white cabinets with no signage except for brand, type and price and obligatory government warnings.

It's seen a decrease to the % of people who take up smoking and an increase to the % of people quitting smoking.

They've just introduced legislation to force tobacco companies to have plain white packaging which allows them only identify the brand name and type while still carrying images similar to the ones above with government health warnings. The tobacco companies are fighting this hard but it's pretty much guaranteed to be passed into law in the next month.

They've also made it practically impossible to smoke anywhere in public. No smoking in restaurants/bars etc. No smoking within 6 metres of a government building. There is also legislation in the works to prevent people from being able to smoke in their car.

_________________
Owl_Farmer wrote:
Cheer up. You're not depressed, you're just a big homo.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: US goes Singapore route re: cigarette warnings
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 1:46 am 
Offline
User avatar
Red Mosquito, my libido
 Profile

Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:02 am
Posts: 91597
Location: Sector 7-G
God damned communists.

_________________
It takes a big man to make a threat on the internet.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: US goes Singapore route re: cigarette warnings
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 1:50 am 
Offline
User avatar
AnalLog
 Profile

Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 3:28 am
Posts: 28541
Location: PORTLAND, ME
cutuphalfdead wrote:
God damned communists.

clearly the terrorists have won, team.

_________________
Winner, 2011 RM 'Stache Tournament


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: US goes Singapore route re: cigarette warnings
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 1:53 am 
Offline
User avatar
Red Mosquito, my libido
 Profile

Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:02 am
Posts: 91597
Location: Sector 7-G
I'm definitely oversimplifying it, but it doesn't sit well with me that something can be legal and this heavily discouraged. I'm not saying we should promote smoking, or let Joe Camel push butts to kids again, but adults should be able to make their own decisions within the realm of legality.

That comment really isn't about labeling, but the trend in tobacco legislation. You see it in what Beef posts about Australia. I mean really, banning smoking in your car?

_________________
It takes a big man to make a threat on the internet.


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Board index » Word on the Street... » News & Debate


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 11:52 am