Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:08 am Posts: 22978 Gender: Male
I looked for an appropriate topic on this, and couldn't find one(well, i found one DJ's epic RM=retarded inbreds thread, but its locked), so feel free to merge it if you need to CHUD.
Recently, the mayor of a somewhat affluent suburb of Detroit (troy) made the following statement on her facebook.
"I think I am going to throw away my I Love New York carrying bag now that queers can get married there."
And of course there is an outrage over the use of the word "queer." She may step down (hopefully) and has already apologized for the word. But it really struck me as odd how caught up everyone was with the word queer... when to me, that's not even the most troubling thing in the statement. Not only is she showing a very vocal disdain for equal rights, she also is on some level attempting to be punitive to someone just for supporting it. Yet no one in the local media (or even the actual protests about the statement) seems to care about how awful the message, as a whole, is. Instead, they are just focused on the one word. And that is bothering me that we (as a society) have come to disregard the message based entirely on word choice- positive or negative.
What if she said "I love the queer community?" In that case, the message is positive, but i imagine she would have been condemned the same way. Unfortunately there are many people who don't keep up with what word is offensive what week (there is a black lady who works for me who said "Jewed down" the other day- without a second thought for the racism implied in that statement). and sometimes say something with no ill intent. It just seems that so often we look for that buzzword to get fired up about without focusing on the actual message.
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:51 am Posts: 4009 Location: S. Florida Gender: Female
Skitch Patterson wrote:
I looked for an appropriate topic on this, and couldn't find one(well, i found one DJ's epic RM=retarded inbreds thread, but its locked), so feel free to merge it if you need to CHUD.
Recently, the mayor of a somewhat affluent suburb of Detroit (troy) made the following statement on her facebook.
"I think I am going to throw away my I Love New York carrying bag now that queers can get married there."
And of course there is an outrage over the use of the word "queer." She may step down (hopefully) and has already apologized for the word. But it really struck me as odd how caught up everyone was with the word queer... when to me, that's not even the most troubling thing in the statement. Not only is she showing a very vocal disdain for equal rights, she also is on some level attempting to be punitive to someone just for supporting it. Yet no one in the local media (or even the actual protests about the statement) seems to care about how awful the message, as a whole, is. Instead, they are just focused on the one word. And that is bothering me that we (as a society) have come to disregard the message based entirely on word choice- positive or negative.
What if she said "I love the queer community?" In that case, the message is positive, but i imagine she would have been condemned the same way. Unfortunately there are many people who don't keep up with what word is offensive what week (there is a black lady who works for me who said "Jewed down" the other day- without a second thought for the racism implied in that statement). and sometimes say something with no ill intent. It just seems that so often we look for that buzzword to get fired up about without focusing on the actual message.
I would tend to think that a message and its intent has more of an impact than just the word itself.
for instance, when the woman said "jewed down", was her comment taken the same way as it would have if the comment was instead a hateful one?
also, was that woman's race significant in relation to her comment?
_________________ Can you feel the magic? Oh, yeah
Skitch, in your example, the message is her expressing an opinion, i.e., she's against gay people's right to marriage. But since 'everyone' agrees that 'queer' is an offensive term towards gay people, that's what they hinge on.
You're free to have opinions, but not to blatantly insult people while expressing them, or some such.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:08 am Posts: 22978 Gender: Male
Owl_Farmer wrote:
Skitch, in your example, the message is her expressing an opinion, i.e., she's against gay people's right to marriage. But since 'everyone' agrees that 'queer' is an offensive term towards gay people, that's what they hinge on.
You're free to have opinions, but not to blatantly insult people while expressing them, or some such.
Fair enough. It just bugs me that such an overbearingly negative statment is being lost because of the word choice. Instead of a debate about the issue and the statement, its a "well gay people get to say it!" argument.
I get your point about how the larger issue is ignored in favour of the smaller issue, but the ways of modern media dictate precisely that. We thought we had it bad with TV, but this social media nonsense is making things way worse in regards to people's attention spans and capacity to make articulate arguments.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:08 am Posts: 22978 Gender: Male
Owl_Farmer wrote:
I get your point about how the larger issue is ignored in favour of the smaller issue, but the ways of modern media dictate precisely that. We thought we had it bad with TV, but this social media nonsense is making things way worse in regards to people's attention spans and capacity to make articulate arguments.
I get your point about how the larger issue is ignored in favour of the smaller issue, but the ways of modern media dictate precisely that. We thought we had it bad with TV, but this social media nonsense is making things way worse in regards to people's attention spans and capacity to make articulate arguments.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum