Board index » Word on the Street... » News & Debate




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: voting rights
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 10:44 pm 
Offline
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:50 pm
Posts: 3955
Location: Leaving Here
Link to yahoo article here

Can someone tell me, is there a reason why someone in prison would not be allowed to vote? Is it simply an inability to be properly registered or something? Or is it simply a consequence of being convicted of a felony?

I can't imaging that intentionally not allowing an EX convict to vote would be legal, constitutionally, would it?

c-


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 10:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Of Counsel
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:14 am
Posts: 37778
Location: OmaGOD!!!
Gender: Male
I started a thread about this on the old board, with a poll and everything, but it appears that all of N&D was lost from the database of the old board, so I can't link it here. :(

--PunkDavid

_________________
Unfortunately, at the Dawning of the Age of Aquarius, the Flower Children jerked off and went back to sleep.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 12:48 am 
Offline
User avatar
The Maleficent
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:17 pm
Posts: 13551
Location: is a jerk in wyoming
Gender: Female
Did you want convicted murders participating in choosing your government? What about serial killers? anarchists? what about repeated child molesters?

don't they kind of forfeit their right/ability to participate in the society when they choose to commit crimes like that?
Those are crimes against the very society they wish to participate in if they want to vote.

What about people who rob banks? or people who embezzle from a company they work for? How about people who create malicious computer code to break into databases? Heroin dealers?

_________________
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
That's it. I'm going to Wyoming.
Alex wrote:
you are the human wyoming


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 4:19 am 
Offline
User avatar
Force of Nature
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:05 pm
Posts: 622
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
malice wrote:
Did you want convicted murders participating in choosing your government? What about serial killers? anarchists? what about repeated child molesters?

don't they kind of forfeit their right/ability to participate in the society when they choose to commit crimes like that?
Those are crimes against the very society they wish to participate in if they want to vote.

What about people who rob banks? or people who embezzle from a company they work for? How about people who create malicious computer code to break into databases? Heroin dealers?


I don't know about the murderers or or molesters, but I have someone close to me who was covicted of bank robbery many years ago. He served his time and all that and I think it was about 10 years after he got out of prison that he got the right to vote back. So some ex-cons do vote...

_________________
original join date: 29 September 2002
darth_vedder wrote:
I hate Pearl Jam and the goddamn 10 club.

Ledbetterman10 wrote:
This place is a cesspool of douchbagery.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 4:39 am 
Offline
User avatar
Of Counsel
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:14 am
Posts: 37778
Location: OmaGOD!!!
Gender: Male
N&D problem on the old board is now fixed. Here is the old thread for your enjoyment.

http://www.freetextures.de/rm1/viewtopic.php?t=41164

--PunkDavid

_________________
Unfortunately, at the Dawning of the Age of Aquarius, the Flower Children jerked off and went back to sleep.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 1:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar
too drunk to moderate properly
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 7:19 pm
Posts: 39068
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Gender: Male
I prefer #3 (voting rights after sentence and completion of parole/probation), but would be willing to take #2 (voting rights as soon as released). Whatever your crime, if the corrections officials feel you're safe to run around in public, how much damage could you possibly cause by voting?

_________________
"Though some may think there should be a separation between art/music and politics, it should be reinforced that art can be a form of nonviolent protest." - e.v.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar
In a van down by the river
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:15 am
Posts: 33031
if your guilty on the account of murder, meaning you planned to take someones life, you should never have the right to vote or other things. you took someones life and robbed them of their rights, you shouldnt have any

_________________
maybe we can hum along...


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Force of Nature
 Profile

Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 6:40 pm
Posts: 746
Location: Tampa
Peeps wrote:
if your guilty on the account of murder, meaning you planned to take someones life, you should never have the right to vote or other things. you took someones life and robbed them of their rights, you shouldnt have any


I concur.

_________________
"High intensity."


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar
too drunk to moderate properly
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 7:19 pm
Posts: 39068
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Gender: Male
turkey sub jr. wrote:
Peeps wrote:
if your guilty on the account of murder, meaning you planned to take someones life, you should never have the right to vote or other things. you took someones life and robbed them of their rights, you shouldnt have any


I concur.


So, is that murder 1? Murder 2? Manslaughter? Negligible behavior leading to death? By your standard, why would we ever let anyone out of jail? I mean, not that some people shouldn't get life in prison, but a lot of people who are responsible for the death of others do eventually get out of jail after either "paying their debt" or completing rehabilitation requirements.

_________________
"Though some may think there should be a separation between art/music and politics, it should be reinforced that art can be a form of nonviolent protest." - e.v.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar
In a van down by the river
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:15 am
Posts: 33031
just_b wrote:
turkey sub jr. wrote:
Peeps wrote:
if your guilty on the account of murder, meaning you planned to take someones life, you should never have the right to vote or other things. you took someones life and robbed them of their rights, you shouldnt have any


I concur.


So, is that murder 1? Murder 2? Manslaughter? Negligible behavior leading to death? By your standard, why would we ever let anyone out of jail? I mean, not that some people shouldn't get life in prison, but a lot of people who are responsible for the death of others do eventually get out of jail after either "paying their debt" or completing rehabilitation requirements.


im not sure the exact definitions of murder, but thats why i stated, you planned to take someones life

_________________
maybe we can hum along...


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Force of Nature
 Profile

Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 6:40 pm
Posts: 746
Location: Tampa
just_b wrote:
turkey sub jr. wrote:
Peeps wrote:
if your guilty on the account of murder, meaning you planned to take someones life, you should never have the right to vote or other things. you took someones life and robbed them of their rights, you shouldnt have any


I concur.


So, is that murder 1? Murder 2? Manslaughter? Negligible behavior leading to death? By your standard, why would we ever let anyone out of jail? I mean, not that some people shouldn't get life in prison, but a lot of people who are responsible for the death of others do eventually get out of jail after either "paying their debt" or completing rehabilitation requirements.


First off, do murders, molesters, kidnappers, etc. even care about voting?

_________________
"High intensity."


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar
too drunk to moderate properly
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 7:19 pm
Posts: 39068
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Gender: Male
turkey sub jr. wrote:
First off, do murders, molesters, kidnappers, etc. even care about voting?
Well, I haven't seen a poll, but would we be having a debate if they hadn't tried?

_________________
"Though some may think there should be a separation between art/music and politics, it should be reinforced that art can be a form of nonviolent protest." - e.v.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Force of Nature
 Profile

Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 6:40 pm
Posts: 746
Location: Tampa
just_b wrote:
turkey sub jr. wrote:
First off, do murders, molesters, kidnappers, etc. even care about voting?
Well, I haven't seen a poll, but would we be having a debate if they hadn't tried?


Who knows? The bleeding hearts like to champion a lot of causes, regardless of how those actually involved care about it. :D

_________________
"High intensity."


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar
too drunk to moderate properly
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 7:19 pm
Posts: 39068
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Gender: Male
Peeps wrote:
just_b wrote:
turkey sub jr. wrote:
Peeps wrote:
if your guilty on the account of murder, meaning you planned to take someones life, you should never have the right to vote or other things. you took someones life and robbed them of their rights, you shouldnt have any


I concur.


So, is that murder 1? Murder 2? Manslaughter? Negligible behavior leading to death? By your standard, why would we ever let anyone out of jail? I mean, not that some people shouldn't get life in prison, but a lot of people who are responsible for the death of others do eventually get out of jail after either "paying their debt" or completing rehabilitation requirements.


im not sure the exact definitions of murder, but thats why i stated, you planned to take someones life


Well, for sake of argument (and with my extensive law show background), we'll call that 1st degree murder. But those people do still get released from jail from time to time. Someone (a parole board?) has found them eligible to receive the rest of their rights back, why hold back voting? It just seems like an arbitrary right to yank away from someone who gets all their other rights.

_________________
"Though some may think there should be a separation between art/music and politics, it should be reinforced that art can be a form of nonviolent protest." - e.v.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar
In a van down by the river
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:15 am
Posts: 33031
just_b wrote:
Well, for sake of argument (and with my extensive law show background), we'll call that 1st degree murder. But those people do still get released from jail from time to time. Someone (a parole board?) has found them eligible to receive the rest of their rights back, why hold back voting? It just seems like an arbitrary right to yank away from someone who gets all their other rights.


this is all just on personal belief/opinion mind you, but i feel if you knowingly murder someone and it is premeditated, and not in self defense, your ass should never see the light of day

_________________
maybe we can hum along...


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar
too drunk to moderate properly
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 7:19 pm
Posts: 39068
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Gender: Male
Adding to the debate, here you can see where your state falls: http://www.hrw.org/reports98/vote/usvot98o.htm

_________________
"Though some may think there should be a separation between art/music and politics, it should be reinforced that art can be a form of nonviolent protest." - e.v.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Force of Nature
 Profile

Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 6:40 pm
Posts: 746
Location: Tampa
just_b wrote:
Peeps wrote:
just_b wrote:
turkey sub jr. wrote:
Peeps wrote:
if your guilty on the account of murder, meaning you planned to take someones life, you should never have the right to vote or other things. you took someones life and robbed them of their rights, you shouldnt have any


I concur.


So, is that murder 1? Murder 2? Manslaughter? Negligible behavior leading to death? By your standard, why would we ever let anyone out of jail? I mean, not that some people shouldn't get life in prison, but a lot of people who are responsible for the death of others do eventually get out of jail after either "paying their debt" or completing rehabilitation requirements.


im not sure the exact definitions of murder, but thats why i stated, you planned to take someones life


Well, for sake of argument (and with my extensive law show background), we'll call that 1st degree murder. But those people do still get released from jail from time to time. Someone (a parole board?) has found them eligible to receive the rest of their rights back, why hold back voting? It just seems like an arbitrary right to yank away from someone who gets all their other rights.


Perhaps it's just an extra slap in the face for bein' a jerk?

_________________
"High intensity."


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 4:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Administrator
 Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:53 pm
Posts: 20537
Location: The City Of Trees
just_b wrote:
Adding to the debate, here you can see where your state falls: http://www.hrw.org/reports98/vote/usvot98o.htm


Never would have guessed that Utah would be in the same category as Maine, Mass, and Vermont.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 4:31 pm 
Offline
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:50 pm
Posts: 3955
Location: Leaving Here
malice wrote:
Did you want convicted murders participating in choosing your government? What about serial killers? anarchists? what about repeated child molesters?

don't they kind of forfeit their right/ability to participate in the society when they choose to commit crimes like that?
Those are crimes against the very society they wish to participate in if they want to vote.

What about people who rob banks? or people who embezzle from a company they work for? How about people who create malicious computer code to break into databases? Heroin dealers?


What I want was not the question.

The question(s) I asked, for which I don't see a response yet.

So I re-ask:

Can someone tell me, is there a (legal, on file, documented) reason why someone in prison would not be allowed to vote? Is it simply an inability to be properly registered or something? Or is it simply a consequence of being convicted of a felony?

I can't imaging that intentionally not allowing an EX convict (someone who has served their time and has been released on parole, as discribed in the original artile link for example) to vote would be legal, constitutionally, would it?


c-


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 4:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar
In a van down by the river
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:15 am
Posts: 33031
cltaylor12 wrote:
malice wrote:
Did you want convicted murders participating in choosing your government? What about serial killers? anarchists? what about repeated child molesters?

don't they kind of forfeit their right/ability to participate in the society when they choose to commit crimes like that?
Those are crimes against the very society they wish to participate in if they want to vote.

What about people who rob banks? or people who embezzle from a company they work for? How about people who create malicious computer code to break into databases? Heroin dealers?


What I want was not the question.

The question(s) I asked, for which I don't see a response yet.

So I re-ask:

Can someone tell me, is there a (legal, on file, documented) reason why someone in prison would not be allowed to vote? Is it simply an inability to be properly registered or something? Or is it simply a consequence of being convicted of a felony?

I can't imaging that intentionally not allowing an EX convict (someone who has served their time and has been released on parole, as discribed in the original artile link for example) to vote would be legal, constitutionally, would it?


c-




a simple search of google is all you need

_________________
maybe we can hum along...


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Board index » Word on the Street... » News & Debate


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
It is currently Wed Jan 21, 2026 10:58 pm