Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 3:43 am Posts: 18418 Location: Anytown, USA Gender: Male
ok, i can handle the blue ice.......but this is a JOKE.
_________________
stip wrote:
In five years, when you get laid and grow up, you should go back and read some of these posts and if you've turned into a decent person you'll realize how much of an asshole you sound like right now
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:53 pm Posts: 8066 Location: Las Vegas via Rockford (Roscoe), IL Gender: Female
I don't like that idea one bit. I think that it would lead to a more defensive style of game and I would not be too big on that.
Go_State wrote:
Seriously, if they want to increase scoring, call some fucking holding/obstruction penalties.
_________________ Frank Kevin
At night I drink myself to sleep and pretend I don't care that you're not here with me Cause it's so much easier to handle all my problems if I'm too far out to sea
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:35 am Posts: 5981 Location: Bel-Air Gender: Male
I dont really like hockey because it hasnt been invinted in Indiana yet, but if they tried to change the size of the goal or backboard in the NBA, or changed the size of the field goal post in the NFL I would be wicked pissed. It fucks with all the history that goes along with the NHL.
_________________ On the playground is where I spend most of my days.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:35 am Posts: 5981 Location: Bel-Air Gender: Male
parchy wrote:
Crazy at War wrote:
it hasnt been invinted
Could that be why?
There is no such thing as hockey in Indiana. I dont get it, Indiana is right in the middle of great hockey and baseball teams, yet we dont give a damn about either sport. On our local news there are ZERO hockey highlights ever. Even if it is the NHL Finals, we still dont see highlights.
_________________ On the playground is where I spend most of my days.
This is a bad idea. They look like nets in a funhouse mirror. I agree with Go_State. When there's a dump in and the defender wraps his arms around the forechecker who is trying to get to the puck, you may want to call a penalty on that.
_________________ This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps!
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 2:16 am Posts: 1213 Location: Greenwich CT
flavdave wrote:
twoheadedboy wrote:
How about shrinking goalie pad size down to original sizes before making a bigger net?
Yes, I agree with that. I think they talked about doing that, or maybe they actually did shrink down goalie pad sizes a little bit in recent years.
I third that. They really need to do something about scoring, but I dont think making the goal bigger solves that problem, because that will just bring about even BIGGER padding. I think they need to decrease the sizes of padding...that simple
_________________ ~ Me fail English? That's unpossible. ~
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:34 am Posts: 12700 Location: ...a town in north Ontario...
Changing the net size will do nothing. The problem isn't even with scoring, it's that there aren't even any chances. A 6-4 score doesn't mean it's a good game if there are 10 garbage goals. Big nets do not equal excitement.
_________________ I think we relinquished enough... and it's still dark enough... and it goes on and on and on...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
