Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:59 am Posts: 18643 Location: Raleigh, NC Gender: Male
Mitchell wrote:
Athletic Supporter wrote:
Trade some of those bats for some arms. Pray that they do that.
What bat would you trade? Soriano?
Pick 2, any 2. Mench, Soriano, Gonzalez, Young, Blalock..whoever. They've tried this hitting philosophy for the last 15 years, see how far they've gotten?
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:44 am Posts: 14671 Location: Baton Rouge Gender: Male
Athletic Supporter wrote:
Mitchell wrote:
Athletic Supporter wrote:
Trade some of those bats for some arms. Pray that they do that.
What bat would you trade? Soriano?
Pick 2, any 2. Mench, Soriano, Gonzalez, Young, Blalock..whoever. They've tried this hitting philosophy for the last 15 years, see how far they've gotten?
pssh, there's no way they're trading young, blalock, or mench.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:59 am Posts: 18643 Location: Raleigh, NC Gender: Male
Mitchell wrote:
Athletic Supporter wrote:
Mitchell wrote:
Athletic Supporter wrote:
Trade some of those bats for some arms. Pray that they do that.
What bat would you trade? Soriano?
Pick 2, any 2. Mench, Soriano, Gonzalez, Young, Blalock..whoever. They've tried this hitting philosophy for the last 15 years, see how far they've gotten?
pssh, there's no way they're trading young, blalock, or mench.
No, but they should. They're not because they're stupid and think that the big bats are the key to winning championships. I remember the days of Palmiero, Canseco, Palmer, etc. Those teams had the exact same problems as this one. At least they've got Buck on the bench.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:44 am Posts: 14671 Location: Baton Rouge Gender: Male
Athletic Supporter wrote:
Mitchell wrote:
Athletic Supporter wrote:
Mitchell wrote:
Athletic Supporter wrote:
Trade some of those bats for some arms. Pray that they do that.
What bat would you trade? Soriano?
Pick 2, any 2. Mench, Soriano, Gonzalez, Young, Blalock..whoever. They've tried this hitting philosophy for the last 15 years, see how far they've gotten?
pssh, there's no way they're trading young, blalock, or mench.
No, but they should. They're not because they're stupid and think that the big bats are the key to winning championships. I remember the days of Palmiero, Canseco, Palmer, etc. Those teams had the exact same problems as this one. At least they've got Buck on the bench.
yep, the rangers were stupid to draft teixeira and blalock, and also to take young over abernathy in the toronto trade.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:59 am Posts: 18643 Location: Raleigh, NC Gender: Male
Mitchell wrote:
yep, the rangers were stupid to draft teixeira and blalock, and also to take young over abernathy in the toronto trade.
I never said drafting those guys was stupid. They've done a great job at developing offensive players, what's why a few of them are expendable.
I'm saying that holding onto as many bats as they have while running Chan Ho Park and Ryan Drese out on the mound is stupid. There's no way Pedro Astacio holds it together for the full season either. His last decent season was 1997. They desparately need pitching help, desperately.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum