why do you say that? because they blew it with k.c., tampa bay, and a stripped down chicago team that had nothing to play for? it's not like they lost to tampa b. . .fuck. nevermind.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:26 am Posts: 995 Location: NY
I wouldn't be so hard on them, the played over their heads for a long time, the ending was tough but they obviously have something to build on for 2006.
a team has to have the lead in order to choke. what they did is better referred to as "not getting the job done"
_________________ i was dreaming through the howzlife yawning car black when she told me "mad and meaningless as ever" and a song came on my radio like a cemetery rhyme for a million crying corpses in their tragedy of respectable existence
once Sizemore lost that fly ball in the sun, it was all over.
However, this team has enough young talent to dominate the division for the next 5 years like they did throughout the 90's.
_________________ “You’re good kids, stay together. Trust each other and be good teammates to one another. I believe there is a championship in this room.”
-Ernie Accorsi in his final address to the NY Giants locker room before retiring as GM in January of 2007
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:52 pm Posts: 10620 Location: Chicago, IL Gender: Male
knuckles of frisco wrote:
a team has to have the lead in order to choke. what they did is better referred to as "not getting the job done"
They were up on the wild card by as many as two games with a week to play, and were closing in on the division. They lost games to KC, Tampa Bay, and got swept by Chicago (a team that had nothing to play for, and that played its "B" team on Friday). They choked.
a team has to have the lead in order to choke. what they did is better referred to as "not getting the job done"
They were up on the wild card by as many as two games with a week to play, and were closing in on the division. They lost games to KC, Tampa Bay, and got swept by Chicago (a team that had nothing to play for, and that played its "B" team on Friday). They choked.
good call. i was thinking in terms of winning the AL central.
_________________ i was dreaming through the howzlife yawning car black when she told me "mad and meaningless as ever" and a song came on my radio like a cemetery rhyme for a million crying corpses in their tragedy of respectable existence
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:44 am Posts: 14671 Location: Baton Rouge Gender: Male
Stripe64 wrote:
Mitchell wrote:
Stripe64 wrote:
knuckles of frisco wrote:
a team has to have the lead in order to choke.
Ya, kinda like last years ALCS.
actually, its not.
hey, if as a sox fan you'd rather fault the yankees for choking than crediting the sox for coming back then go ahead. it shows where your priorities are.
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:26 pm Posts: 14525 Location: Buffalo
I think they're poised to be Braves-like in the next several years (in terms of winning the division), as long as they can maintain their bullpen. I'm still not sold on Wickman's health holding out long-term, so I'd like to see a new closer, or a reliever that could slide into that role next year.
Get rid of Belliard, sign another bat and the Tribe's in good shape.
_________________ If animal trapped call 410-844-6286, then hit option 1123 6536 5321, then dial 4 8 15 16 23 42
hey, if as a sox fan you'd rather fault the yankees for choking than crediting the sox for coming back then go ahead. it shows where your priorities are.
Is that supposed to mean something? The Yankees were 3 outs away from sweeping, and end up getting reverse swept. Obviously the better team was the Red Sox, but that doesn't mean the Yankees didn't choke.
hey, if as a sox fan you'd rather fault the yankees for choking than crediting the sox for coming back then go ahead. it shows where your priorities are.
Is that supposed to mean something? The Yankees were 3 outs away from sweeping, and end up getting reverse swept. Obviously the better team was the Red Sox, but that doesn't mean the Yankees didn't choke.
As much as I dislike the Sox, I must say I agree with you here.
i think it's premature to hand the indians the division next year or for the next 5. yes, they should probably be favorites, but chicago is pretty decent, the tigers finally got a real manager, and the twins have arguably the best pitching staff in the a.l. if they get a 2nd and 3rd baseman who can hit, like soriano and mueller, suddenly they're winning some of the 30 games they lost by one run.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:26 am Posts: 995 Location: NY
Stripe64 wrote:
Mitchell wrote:
hey, if as a sox fan you'd rather fault the yankees for choking than crediting the sox for coming back then go ahead. it shows where your priorities are.
Is that supposed to mean something? The Yankees were 3 outs away from sweeping, and end up getting reverse swept. Obviously the better team was the Red Sox, but that doesn't mean the Yankees didn't choke.
So you are taking credit away from the Sox? Are you putting everything on the Yankees "choking" while the Sox just happened to be there in the right place at the right time?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
