Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:09 pm Posts: 9363 Location: Manhattan Beach California
Stripe64 wrote:
Doug RR wrote:
Wow, a Boston fan saying pay him whatever he wants.....
Wow, a NY fan being a moron, what a suprise.
Dude, I was making a joke, this is why I rarely participate in these threads because people have no sense of humor.....Look back to any baseball thread and tell me if I have ever talked smack.
Wow, a Boston fan saying pay him whatever he wants.....
Wow, a NY fan being a moron, what a suprise.
Dude, I was making a joke, this is why I rarely participate in these threads because people have no sense of humor.....Look back to any baseball thread and tell me if I have ever talked smack.
Sorry, didn't mean to upset you. Will you ever forgive me?
_________________ "The bigger the lie, the easier it is to believe." - Adolf Hitler
Why is this surprising? Did anyone actually think Varitek wanted a one year contract?
What are talking about, Boston offered him 4 years.
yes, and your point is?
You said one, year, therefore I am letting you know you are completely wrong. Was it that hard to decifer my point.
it was because it doesn't make any sense. He declined arbitration, which has nothing to do with any four year contract the Sox may or may not offer him. Do you have any idea what arbitration means?
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:38 pm Posts: 2055 Location: lurking
davo15 wrote:
Stripe64 wrote:
davo15 wrote:
Stripe64 wrote:
davo15 wrote:
Why is this surprising? Did anyone actually think Varitek wanted a one year contract?
What are talking about, Boston offered him 4 years.
yes, and your point is?
You said one, year, therefore I am letting you know you are completely wrong. Was it that hard to decifer my point.
it was because it doesn't make any sense. He declined arbitration, which has nothing to do with any four year contract the Sox may or may not offer him. Do you have any idea what arbitration means?
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:52 pm Posts: 10620 Location: Chicago, IL Gender: Male
little_secrets wrote:
davo15 wrote:
Stripe64 wrote:
davo15 wrote:
Stripe64 wrote:
davo15 wrote:
Why is this surprising? Did anyone actually think Varitek wanted a one year contract?
What are talking about, Boston offered him 4 years.
yes, and your point is?
You said one, year, therefore I am letting you know you are completely wrong. Was it that hard to decifer my point.
it was because it doesn't make any sense. He declined arbitration, which has nothing to do with any four year contract the Sox may or may not offer him. Do you have any idea what arbitration means?
yes
The rest of your Red Sox buddies on this board are making you look bad. Better put the smack-down on them.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:38 pm Posts: 2055 Location: lurking
Chris_H_2 wrote:
little_secrets wrote:
davo15 wrote:
Stripe64 wrote:
davo15 wrote:
Stripe64 wrote:
davo15 wrote:
Why is this surprising? Did anyone actually think Varitek wanted a one year contract?
What are talking about, Boston offered him 4 years.
yes, and your point is?
You said one, year, therefore I am letting you know you are completely wrong. Was it that hard to decifer my point.
it was because it doesn't make any sense. He declined arbitration, which has nothing to do with any four year contract the Sox may or may not offer him. Do you have any idea what arbitration means?
yes
The rest of your Red Sox buddies on this board are making you look bad. Better put the smack-down on them.
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:52 pm Posts: 10620 Location: Chicago, IL Gender: Male
little_secrets wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
little_secrets wrote:
davo15 wrote:
Stripe64 wrote:
davo15 wrote:
Stripe64 wrote:
davo15 wrote:
Why is this surprising? Did anyone actually think Varitek wanted a one year contract?
What are talking about, Boston offered him 4 years.
yes, and your point is?
You said one, year, therefore I am letting you know you are completely wrong. Was it that hard to decifer my point.
it was because it doesn't make any sense. He declined arbitration, which has nothing to do with any four year contract the Sox may or may not offer him. Do you have any idea what arbitration means?
yes
The rest of your Red Sox buddies on this board are making you look bad. Better put the smack-down on them.
so i see
not much i can do really.
Revoke their Red Sox Fan Membership cards and reimburse them the $10 they shelled out . . .
Why is this surprising? Did anyone actually think Varitek wanted a one year contract?
What are talking about, Boston offered him 4 years.
yes, and your point is?
You said one, year, therefore I am letting you know you are completely wrong. Was it that hard to decifer my point.
it was because it doesn't make any sense. He declined arbitration, which has nothing to do with any four year contract the Sox may or may not offer him. Do you have any idea what arbitration means?
Yes I do know what it means, a third party comes in to settle a dispute in what the two parties think a player is worth. The third party give a sum in what he thinks the player is worth for one year. This doesn't mean he is signing a one year contract.
_________________ "The bigger the lie, the easier it is to believe." - Adolf Hitler
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum