Board index » Word on the Street... » Sports




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1708 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 86  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: COLLEGE FOOTBALL 2009-2010, bitches
PostPosted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 5:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Stone's Bitch
 Profile

Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 8:33 am
Posts: 35357
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Gender: Male
Clemson. :|

_________________
Winner, RM all-time NBA tourney. :D

Winner, 2008 US Pearl Jam fantasy league. :D

Everton FC: 3-1-5
Anaheim Webbed D's: 5-6-2
USC Football: 7-2
Denver Broncos: 3-5


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: COLLEGE FOOTBALL 2009-2010, bitches
PostPosted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 6:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Unthought Known
 Profile

Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 7:02 pm
Posts: 6405
Location: DC
Gender: Male
pearljamfan80 wrote:
Clemson. :|


Yes. And to make matters worse, I like the Redskins. I'm in a perpetual mediocre state. The Skins will fall somewhere between 7-9 and 9-7. Clemson, actually has no expectations this year, and with Bowden gone, no hype, a lot of returning starters (7 on O; 8 on D), Kevin Steele (from Alabama) as D Coordinator, I think the Tigers may surprise this year. Not to mention CJ Spiller could be huge for them. QB unfortunately is an unproven position where a Sophomore and Freshman are going at it for the starting job. I have a feeling having an inexperienced QB will cost the team a few games. They'll be tougher than under Bowden, but probably finish out 8-4 or 9-3; good but not great (as usual).


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: COLLEGE FOOTBALL 2009-2010, bitches
PostPosted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 6:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Stone's Bitch
 Profile

Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 8:33 am
Posts: 35357
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Gender: Male
darth_vedder wrote:
pearljamfan80 wrote:
Clemson. :|


Yes. And to make matters worse, I like the Redskins. I'm in a perpetual mediocre state. The Skins will fall somewhere between 7-9 and 9-7. Clemson, actually has no expectations this year, and with Bowden gone, no hype, a lot of returning starters (7 on O; 8 on D), Kevin Steele (from Alabama) as D Coordinator, I think the Tigers may surprise this year. Not to mention CJ Spiller could be huge for them. QB unfortunately is an unproven position where a Sophomore and Freshman are going at it for the starting job. I have a feeling having an inexperienced QB will cost the team a few games. They'll be tougher than under Bowden, but probably finish out 8-4 or 9-3; good but not great (as usual).

Clemson and Washington are definitely a recipe for mediocrity. :lol:

_________________
Winner, RM all-time NBA tourney. :D

Winner, 2008 US Pearl Jam fantasy league. :D

Everton FC: 3-1-5
Anaheim Webbed D's: 5-6-2
USC Football: 7-2
Denver Broncos: 3-5


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: COLLEGE FOOTBALL 2009-2010, bitches
PostPosted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 6:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Unthought Known
 Profile

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:47 pm
Posts: 9282
Location: Atlanta
Gender: Male
darth_vedder wrote:
pearljamfan80 wrote:
Clemson. :|


Yes. And to make matters worse, I like the Redskins. I'm in a perpetual mediocre state. The Skins will fall somewhere between 7-9 and 9-7. Clemson, actually has no expectations this year, and with Bowden gone, no hype, a lot of returning starters (7 on O; 8 on D), Kevin Steele (from Alabama) as D Coordinator, I think the Tigers may surprise this year. Not to mention CJ Spiller could be huge for them. QB unfortunately is an unproven position where a Sophomore and Freshman are going at it for the starting job. I have a feeling having an inexperienced QB will cost the team a few games. They'll be tougher than under Bowden, but probably finish out 8-4 or 9-3; good but not great (as usual).




At least you have Chris Cooley... he's been hilariously entertaining.

Maybe you get lucky and everything finally clicks and Clemson finally plays to their level of talent. They certainly have plenty of it. Daquan Bowers is a year older. Spiller gets the spotlight, Jacoby Ford should be as fast as any WR or DB in the ACC. Not starting against Bama is a plus.

It's too bad James Lattimore seems bound and determined to leave the state.... Byrnes is so close to Clemson and he is an absolute stud.

_________________
Attention Phenylketonurics: Contains Phenylalanine


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: COLLEGE FOOTBALL 2009-2010, bitches
PostPosted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 6:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Unthought Known
 Profile

Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 7:02 pm
Posts: 6405
Location: DC
Gender: Male
pearljamfan80 wrote:
darth_vedder wrote:
pearljamfan80 wrote:
Clemson. :|


Yes. And to make matters worse, I like the Redskins. I'm in a perpetual mediocre state. The Skins will fall somewhere between 7-9 and 9-7. Clemson, actually has no expectations this year, and with Bowden gone, no hype, a lot of returning starters (7 on O; 8 on D), Kevin Steele (from Alabama) as D Coordinator, I think the Tigers may surprise this year. Not to mention CJ Spiller could be huge for them. QB unfortunately is an unproven position where a Sophomore and Freshman are going at it for the starting job. I have a feeling having an inexperienced QB will cost the team a few games. They'll be tougher than under Bowden, but probably finish out 8-4 or 9-3; good but not great (as usual).

Clemson and Washington are definitely a recipe for mediocrity. :lol:


Ha, yeah, it's actually quite sad. Thing is, both teams are pretty similar...good talent, huge fan base, play tough against equal or better opponents (Clemson will beat Miami or FSU, or Tennessee; Redskins will beat Dallas, Philly, NYG), but both seem to play down to the level of competition (Clemson loses to Duke or Maryland; Redskins lose to St. Louis, or Cincinnati).

Still though, new coaches with both team, new attitude, maybe different results. Zorn and the players seem very comfy with each other this year, and Dabo (Clemson's coach) has great rapport with his team (he was considered one of the best recruiters under Tommy Bowden). Things are just getting started so that new wave of optimism is hitting me. I'll revisit this in November and see how I feel.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: COLLEGE FOOTBALL 2009-2010, bitches
PostPosted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 6:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Unthought Known
 Profile

Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 7:02 pm
Posts: 6405
Location: DC
Gender: Male
Electromatic wrote:
darth_vedder wrote:
pearljamfan80 wrote:
Clemson. :|


Yes. And to make matters worse, I like the Redskins. I'm in a perpetual mediocre state. The Skins will fall somewhere between 7-9 and 9-7. Clemson, actually has no expectations this year, and with Bowden gone, no hype, a lot of returning starters (7 on O; 8 on D), Kevin Steele (from Alabama) as D Coordinator, I think the Tigers may surprise this year. Not to mention CJ Spiller could be huge for them. QB unfortunately is an unproven position where a Sophomore and Freshman are going at it for the starting job. I have a feeling having an inexperienced QB will cost the team a few games. They'll be tougher than under Bowden, but probably finish out 8-4 or 9-3; good but not great (as usual).




At least you have Chris Cooley... he's been hilariously entertaining.

Maybe you get lucky and everything finally clicks and Clemson finally plays to their level of talent. They certainly have plenty of it. Daquan Bowers is a year older. Spiller gets the spotlight, Jacoby Ford should be as fast as any WR or DB in the ACC. Not starting against Bama is a plus.

It's too bad James Lattimore seems bound and determined to leave the state.... Byrnes is so close to Clemson and he is an absolute stud.


Cooley is definitely a fan favorite. Hopefully he'll be with the Skins for awhile...he has the potential to get up there with other fan favorites like Sonny Jurgensen, John Riggins, Sean Taylor, Art Monk, and Darrel Green.

Clemson has no doubt had some great recruiting under Tommy Bowden. He signed some big name guys, but it always seems to be skewed. Like we recruit great receivers, running backs, and d-line, but not so much with O-line, and linebackers. The pieces never seem to fit quite right.

So are who's your team(s)?


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: COLLEGE FOOTBALL 2009-2010, bitches
PostPosted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 7:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Unthought Known
 Profile

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:47 pm
Posts: 9282
Location: Atlanta
Gender: Male
darth_vedder wrote:
Electromatic wrote:
darth_vedder wrote:
pearljamfan80 wrote:
Clemson. :|


Yes. And to make matters worse, I like the Redskins. I'm in a perpetual mediocre state. The Skins will fall somewhere between 7-9 and 9-7. Clemson, actually has no expectations this year, and with Bowden gone, no hype, a lot of returning starters (7 on O; 8 on D), Kevin Steele (from Alabama) as D Coordinator, I think the Tigers may surprise this year. Not to mention CJ Spiller could be huge for them. QB unfortunately is an unproven position where a Sophomore and Freshman are going at it for the starting job. I have a feeling having an inexperienced QB will cost the team a few games. They'll be tougher than under Bowden, but probably finish out 8-4 or 9-3; good but not great (as usual).




At least you have Chris Cooley... he's been hilariously entertaining.

Maybe you get lucky and everything finally clicks and Clemson finally plays to their level of talent. They certainly have plenty of it. Daquan Bowers is a year older. Spiller gets the spotlight, Jacoby Ford should be as fast as any WR or DB in the ACC. Not starting against Bama is a plus.

It's too bad James Lattimore seems bound and determined to leave the state.... Byrnes is so close to Clemson and he is an absolute stud.


Cooley is definitely a fan favorite. Hopefully he'll be with the Skins for awhile...he has the potential to get up there with other fan favorites like Sonny Jurgensen, John Riggins, Sean Taylor, Art Monk, and Darrel Green.

Clemson has no doubt had some great recruiting under Tommy Bowden. He signed some big name guys, but it always seems to be skewed. Like we recruit great receivers, running backs, and d-line, but not so much with O-line, and linebackers. The pieces never seem to fit quite right.

So are who's your team(s)?


Atlanta Falcons
Braves
Hawks
Thrashers
UGA, UNC
I typically pull for Georgia Tech too most of the time too because they are local and I watch them a lot. I know that's all blasphemous and all but I don't really care. I have friends and family at both schools.

I probably care the most about the Falcons and the Braves.


I was at Death Valley with some Clemson friends the year Kelly Campbell caught that ridiculous pass in the back of the end zone when Tech won it in the closing seconds.... depressing night. Must have been 2000.

My grandfather graduated from Clemson so I've always had a soft spot for the Tigers.

_________________
Attention Phenylketonurics: Contains Phenylalanine


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: COLLEGE FOOTBALL 2009-2010, bitches
PostPosted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 10:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar
AnalLog
 Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:15 pm
Posts: 25452
Location: Under my wing like Sanford & Son
Gender: Male
Lips wrote:
what will texas fans bitch about this year??


More realistic question: which Big Ten team will be embarassed this year?

Have fun watching us in the title game. :wave:

_________________
Now that god no longer exists, the desire for another world still remains.

Always do the right thing.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: COLLEGE FOOTBALL 2009-2010, bitches
PostPosted: Sat Aug 01, 2009 12:59 am 
Offline
User avatar
Poney Girl
 Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:17 pm
Posts: 45120
http://utahutes.cstv.com/sports/m-footb ... 09aaa.html

July 30, 2009

SALT LAKE CITY - The University of Utah will play a home-and-away series with Big East power Pitt, the two schools announced today.

The first game is scheduled for Sept. 11, 2010 in Salt Lake City. The Utes and Panthers will play in Pittsburgh on Oct. 15, 2011.

Utah's non-conference schedule for 2010 is now complete and figures to be one of the best in school history with three BCS opponents. Along with Pitt, the Utes will play at Iowa State and Notre Dame. San Jose State is the other non-league foe.

"We are excited about being able to put together a series with Pittsburgh," Utah Director of Athletics Dr. Chris Hill said. "It gives our players a chance to compete against a Big East school and play in that part of the country."

"Pitt-Utah is one of those rarely played intersectional matchups that should be very appealing for our fans and national television," Pittsburgh athletic director Steve Pederson said. "Utah has been one of college football's biggest winners over the past several years, giving us a challenging and compelling opponent."

Utah and Pittsburgh have never met in the regular season. The Utes won the 2005 Fiesta Bowl in the only meeting between the two teams, 35-7, completing a 12-0 season behind future No. 1 draft pick Alex Smith.

Utah is coming off a 13-0 season and Sugar Bowl win over Alabama. The Utes finished with a No. 2 national ranking--the best in school history. Pittsburgh was 9-4 in 2008, playing Oregon State in the Brut Sun Bowl.

_________________
Aliveguy1 wrote:
rediculous


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: COLLEGE FOOTBALL 2009-2010, bitches
PostPosted: Sat Aug 01, 2009 1:07 am 
Offline
Got Some
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 8:28 pm
Posts: 2573
Location: CT
http://www.courant.com/sports/uconn-foo ... 6567.story

UConn To Open 2010 Season At Michigan

STORRS — - UConn and Michigan have reached an agreement on a home-and-home series that will see the Huskies open the 2010 season at Michigan Stadium and the Wolverines play UConn at Rentschler Field in 2013, a source has confirmed.

The individual, who requested anonymity because of the ongoing nature of the negotiations, said UConn will travel to Ann Arbor, Mich., for the opening of the renovated Michigan Stadium on Sept. 4, 2010. Michigan is then aiming to fulfill its end of the deal with a game at Rentschler Field on Sept. 21, 2013.

UConn officials could not confirm the report Thursday afternoon.

"We don't comment on anything until the contracts are signed," said UConn spokesman Mike Enright.

Michigan coach Rich Rodriguez told reporters gathered at Big Ten Media Day in Chicago earlier this week that the Wolverines were looking for a Bowl Championship Series conference opponent that would be open to not having their return game for a couple of years.

The Huskies were open to that deal as long as Michigan was willing to travel to East Hartford and not play the UConn home game at another site. UConn's as-yet-unconfirmed series with Notre Dame had the Huskies playing their home games at either Gillette Stadium in Foxborough, Mass., or the new Giants Stadium in East Rutherford, N.J. They will play Notre Dame in South Bend, Ind., on Nov. 21.

Part of the reason why the contract has not been signed is because UConn is currently scheduled to open the 2010 season against Northeastern at Rentschler Field. Officials at Northeastern could not confirm the game has been moved or canceled, though there is a chance the two teams could meet in 2011.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: COLLEGE FOOTBALL 2009-2010, bitches
PostPosted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 12:38 pm 
Offline
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 2:12 am
Posts: 3783
Lips wrote:
Image

Image

recognize son!

best student section in the country!



The team will be good too...i hope. :bammer:


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: COLLEGE FOOTBALL 2009-2010, bitches
PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 6:08 am 
Offline
User avatar
Banned from the Pit
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:46 am
Posts: 27
Should be another solid year for my Trojans!

Image

Image

I'm thinking another Rose Bowl: Image
Image


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: COLLEGE FOOTBALL 2009-2010, bitches
PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 6:09 am 
Offline
User avatar
Stone's Bitch
 Profile

Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 8:33 am
Posts: 35357
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Gender: Male
There are people who live on the left coast who post on RM?! :shock:

_________________
Winner, RM all-time NBA tourney. :D

Winner, 2008 US Pearl Jam fantasy league. :D

Everton FC: 3-1-5
Anaheim Webbed D's: 5-6-2
USC Football: 7-2
Denver Broncos: 3-5


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: COLLEGE FOOTBALL 2009-2010, bitches
PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 6:12 am 
Offline
User avatar
Banned from the Pit
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:46 am
Posts: 27
Nice! Another Los Angelan!

To all of my So Cal friends...

Image


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: COLLEGE FOOTBALL 2009-2010, bitches
PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 6:54 am 
Offline
User avatar
Stone's Bitch
 Profile

Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 8:33 am
Posts: 35357
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Gender: Male
I'm technically Orange County, I just go to school here.

_________________
Winner, RM all-time NBA tourney. :D

Winner, 2008 US Pearl Jam fantasy league. :D

Everton FC: 3-1-5
Anaheim Webbed D's: 5-6-2
USC Football: 7-2
Denver Broncos: 3-5


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: COLLEGE FOOTBALL 2009-2010, bitches
PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 7:21 am 
Offline
User avatar
Banned from the Pit
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:46 am
Posts: 27
pearljamfan80 wrote:
I'm technically Orange County, I just go to school here.

Good enough for me. The girl I am dating is from the OC.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: COLLEGE FOOTBALL 2009-2010, bitches
PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 1:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Unthought Known
 Profile

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:47 pm
Posts: 9282
Location: Atlanta
Gender: Male
Ah the Song Girls. Best of thier kind in any sport anywhere.

_________________
Attention Phenylketonurics: Contains Phenylalanine


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: COLLEGE FOOTBALL 2009-2010, bitches
PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 11:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Resident Frat Dick
 Profile

Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 7:50 pm
Posts: 10229
Location: WA (aka Waaaaaaaahhhh!!)
Gender: Male
BeldingX2 wrote:
Image


As much as I hate SC, I have to admit...I always do at least a triple-take with the song girls. It's the outfits man...something about those outfits. They look damn good and you can't turn away.

BUT...take a close look at this crops' faces. Seriously. Only about half of them are what I would describe as at least pretty. The other half...dress 'em up in anything but this outfit, and they're not getting your attention.

_________________
Image

9/16/96, 7/21/98, 7/22/98, 11/5/00, 11/6/00, 12/5/02, 12/8/02, 12/9/02, 5/30/03, 10/22/03, 9/24/04, 3/18/05, 9/1/05, 9/2/05, 7/23/06, 9/21/09, 9/22/09, 9/26/09, 9/25/11


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: COLLEGE FOOTBALL 2009-2010, bitches
PostPosted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 3:36 am 
Offline
User avatar
Administrator
 Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:53 pm
Posts: 20537
Location: The City Of Trees
Bammer wrote:
As much as I hate SC, I have to admit...I always do at least a triple-take with the song girls. It's the outfits man...something about those outfits. They look damn good and you can't turn away.

BUT...take a close look at this crops' faces. Seriously. Only about half of them are what I would describe as at least pretty. The other half...dress 'em up in anything but this outfit, and they're not getting your attention.
I think it's at about this moment where someone like Ellis would request pictures of UW cheerleaders for comparison.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: COLLEGE FOOTBALL 2009-2010, bitches
PostPosted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 3:45 am 
Offline
User avatar
Stone's Bitch
 Profile

Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 8:33 am
Posts: 35357
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Gender: Male
To be quite honest the Song Girls are pretty middle of the road by USC standards.

_________________
Winner, RM all-time NBA tourney. :D

Winner, 2008 US Pearl Jam fantasy league. :D

Everton FC: 3-1-5
Anaheim Webbed D's: 5-6-2
USC Football: 7-2
Denver Broncos: 3-5


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1708 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 86  Next

Board index » Word on the Street... » Sports


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
It is currently Fri May 17, 2024 11:49 am