Red Mosquito http://archive.theskyiscrape.com/ |
|
NFL Decadal Rankings http://archive.theskyiscrape.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=88512 |
Page 13 of 15 |
Author: | Kahli Sana [ Fri Feb 05, 2010 6:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: NFL Decadal Rankings |
EllisEamos wrote: totes obvi: 2. colts (lots of reg. season wins, a few afc championship appearances & 1 SB) 1. pats (lots of reg. season wins, a few afc championships & 3 SB) lock'r up! Despite the fact that I like Indy more than NE, I think you're right. |
Author: | punkdavid [ Fri Feb 05, 2010 7:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: NFL Decadal Rankings |
warehouse wrote: punkdavid wrote: So, the top NFC team of the decade is a team with 4 NFC title game losses and 1 Super Bowl loss. Quite the turnaround from the days when the NFC won 12 straight Super Bowls. i dont think anyone would argue against the fact that the afc was much stronger than the nfc during the decade, but i think its starting to even out. although the fact that the eagles are ranked higher than the giants might play a small part in your comment. No, I think that's fair. The Eagles were more consistently good, although never truly great. The Giants had a couple of really good seasons and one Championship, but frankly their two Super Bowl appearances were both kind of fluky. Their best teams, IMO, were the team that lost to the Eagles in the playoffs last year, and the team that blew that game to the 49ers in 2003. Ugh, it still makes me a bit sick to my stomach thinking about that fucking game. |
Author: | Mecca [ Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: NFL Decadal Rankings |
we need this posted today so we can end on the super bowl! |
Author: | Self Polluted [ Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: NFL Decadal Rankings |
I'm biased. |
Author: | Green Habit [ Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:07 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: NFL Decadal Rankings |
Mecca wrote: we need this posted today so we can end on the super bowl! But what if the Colts win?Debate this, fuckers. I don't care if 4/5 is the only one that has a contrarian opinion thus far. |
Author: | bmacsmith [ Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:30 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: NFL Decadal Rankings |
if the Colts win they are number one. best winning percentage and one less superbowl. |
Author: | Self Polluted [ Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:55 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: NFL Decadal Rankings |
Green Habit wrote: Mecca wrote: we need this posted today so we can end on the super bowl! But what if the Colts win?Debate this, fuckers. I don't care if 4/5 is the only one that has a contrarian opinion thus far. |
Author: | Mecca [ Sun Feb 07, 2010 3:09 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: NFL Decadal Rankings |
even I would probably give it to the pats in the event the colts win |
Author: | Too Big a Man Too Say [ Sun Feb 07, 2010 5:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: NFL Decadal Rankings |
Mecca wrote: even I would probably give it to the pats in the event the colts win
|
Author: | Malcolm Sex [ Sun Feb 07, 2010 3:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: NFL Decadal Rankings |
GH thanks for compiling this list, it's been an enjoyable read for weeks now. That being said, even though I'm strongly biased, I would still rank the Colts #2 and the Pats #1 even with a Colts SB victory today. |
Author: | EllisEamos [ Sun Feb 07, 2010 3:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: NFL Decadal Rankings |
let's go w/ head-to-head since '00 to settle things (reg. & post season): pats Ws: colts Ws: in 3 of the last 4 years the colts have really made up some ground, but the pats have the edge for the decade. |
Author: | punkdavid [ Mon Feb 08, 2010 6:59 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: NFL Decadal Rankings |
What happened to this thread? Waiting for the results of the game? |
Author: | dkfan9 [ Mon Feb 08, 2010 7:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: NFL Decadal Rankings |
punkdavid wrote: What happened to this thread? Waiting for the results of the game? yup, think so. |
Author: | mray10 [ Mon Feb 08, 2010 6:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: NFL Decadal Rankings |
Even if the Colts has won, I still think NE earned team of the decade. 3-1 makes it obvious, but 3-2 still is decisive to me. |
Author: | Buffalohed [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:00 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: NFL Decadal Rankings |
Too Big a Man Too Say wrote: Mecca wrote: even I would probably give it to the pats in the event the colts win without a doubt not just 3 SB wins, but an additional SB trip, a perfect regular season, and an entire year without Brady plus, I'd argue the Bears were a relatively weak SB team when the Colts beat them. |
Author: | Buffalohed [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:01 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: NFL Decadal Rankings |
Does anyone think the Steelers should be #2? Just curious. I hate the everloving shit out of both the Steelers and the Colts, but I think I might put Pit at #2. Not really sure. |
Author: | EllisEamos [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:04 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: NFL Decadal Rankings |
Buffalohed wrote: Does anyone think the Steelers should be #2? Just curious. I hate the everloving shit out of both the Steelers and the Colts, but I think I might put Pit at #2. Not really sure. now that i hadn't considered. i vote yes, pitt #2, indy #3!! |
Author: | pearljamfan80 [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:26 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: NFL Decadal Rankings |
Indy was way too consistent this decade to not be 2. 9/10 years making the postseason in the salary cap era. |
Author: | dkfan9 [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:22 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: NFL Decadal Rankings |
yeah i think indy has to take number 2. |
Author: | Green Habit [ Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: NFL Decadal Rankings |
I'll try and finish this up tomorrow, probably in the evening. Yesterday is still kicking my ass right now. |
Page 13 of 15 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |