Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 5:51 am Posts: 17078 Location: TX
dkfan9 wrote:
when talking about best team ever, are we saying regardless of context of era (ie 07 pats would beat 85 bears if they played, something like that) or within the era they played, how they played against that competition?
it makes no sense to compare it out of context, because in that case the teams of the 70s would all completely suck ass and the Lions would probably stop the SB champs from that era. Not to mention teams from the 30s and 40s, which would get beat by Division 5 college teams.
Manning going 14-0 in the regular season and losing the Super Bowl was not the same as Brady doing it with the single best team ever assembled in '07.
I'm looking at the whole of their respective playoff experiences.
So call him the better playoff quarterback if you want. I don't have a problem with that. He's also had better teams, can't we agree. And in fact, when the Pats were winning Super Bowls, Brady was not an otherworldly quarterback. They were a defense first, ball control, mostly conservative team. Brady made huge plays and didn't lose the game, so he was perfect for what they wanted. But when they were winning those SBs it was not all on his shoulders to go out there and win the game for his team like it has been for Manning for at least the last two seasons.
Dude goes 14-0, makes it to the SB with the worst rush offense in the league, plays a great game with one horrendous throw, while guys around him made 3 crucial drops, and somehow over the course of those 3 hours now Tom Brady is better than Manning. Absurd.
1. Manning 2a. Brady 2b. Brees
And Brees is every bit as good as Brady, in a couple of years if he keeps it up he'll be the 2nd best of this generation IMO.
_________________ "Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires." -- John Steinbeck
again, Manning is playing behind arguably the best pass-pro OL in the game, and has crazy offensive weapons in Wayne, Clark, and now Garcon and that other dude.
Did you even watch the game? What did his crazy offensive weapons of Wayne and Garcon do? Sure had some pivotal negative plays from the two of those crazy offensive weapons.
If Wayne and Garcon are crazy offensive weapons, wtf are Randy Moss and Wes Welker?
_________________ "Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires." -- John Steinbeck
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 11:36 pm Posts: 25824 Location: south jersey
aprilfifth wrote:
Buffalohed wrote:
again, Manning is playing behind arguably the best pass-pro OL in the game, and has crazy offensive weapons in Wayne, Clark, and now Garcon and that other dude.
Did you even watch the game? What did his crazy offensive weapons of Wayne and Garcon do? Sure had some pivotal negative plays from the two of those crazy offensive weapons.
If Wayne and Garcon are crazy offensive weapons, wtf are Randy Moss and Wes Welker?
whats funny is you just overrated brees and he's got TONS of crazy offensive weapons.
_________________ Feel the path of every day,... Which road you taking?,...
How did I overrate Brees? He's been a top 3-4 qb in the league for at least the last 4 years. I think he's solidly in the discussion with Brady now, and that if he plays like this for another 3-4 years, he can be better.
_________________ "Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires." -- John Steinbeck
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 11:36 pm Posts: 25824 Location: south jersey
aprilfifth wrote:
How did I overrate Brees? He's been a top 3-4 qb in the league for at least the last 4 years. I think he's solidly in the discussion with Brady now, and that if he plays like this for another 3-4 years, he can be better.
no, brady and manning are in a class of their own.
_________________ Feel the path of every day,... Which road you taking?,...
again, Manning is playing behind arguably the best pass-pro OL in the game, and has crazy offensive weapons in Wayne, Clark, and now Garcon and that other dude.
Did you even watch the game? What did his crazy offensive weapons of Wayne and Garcon do? Sure had some pivotal negative plays from the two of those crazy offensive weapons.
If Wayne and Garcon are crazy offensive weapons, wtf are Randy Moss and Wes Welker?
whats funny is you just overrated brees and he's got TONS of crazy offensive weapons.
but were they weapons or does Brees just make everyone better? outside of Shockey, none of those guys were well known before. either the Saints GM is a genius or Brees can make anyone look good.
i do think Colston is the real deal though and Meachem is coming along. maybe the GM is a genius.
I'd agree with you on that before this year, but Brees has got to be in the discussion now. He's still 3rd, but I think he's crossed over from being the best of the second tier, to belonging in the first tier now.
_________________ "Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires." -- John Steinbeck
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 11:36 pm Posts: 25824 Location: south jersey
bmacsmith wrote:
warehouse wrote:
aprilfifth wrote:
Buffalohed wrote:
again, Manning is playing behind arguably the best pass-pro OL in the game, and has crazy offensive weapons in Wayne, Clark, and now Garcon and that other dude.
Did you even watch the game? What did his crazy offensive weapons of Wayne and Garcon do? Sure had some pivotal negative plays from the two of those crazy offensive weapons.
If Wayne and Garcon are crazy offensive weapons, wtf are Randy Moss and Wes Welker?
whats funny is you just overrated brees and he's got TONS of crazy offensive weapons.
but were they weapons or does Brees just make everyone better? outside of Shockey, none of those guys were well known before. either the Saints GM is a genius or Brees can make anyone look good.
i do think Colston is the real deal though and Meachem is coming along. maybe the GM is a genius.
its not just the GM, the OC plays to brees' strength perfectly
im not trying to put brees down, i just dont think he's a sure bet for the HOF, brady and manning are.
_________________ Feel the path of every day,... Which road you taking?,...
but were they weapons or does Brees just make everyone better? outside of Shockey, none of those guys were well known before. either the Saints GM is a genius or Brees can make anyone look good.
i do think Colston is the real deal though and Meachem is coming along. maybe the GM is a genius.
This is the beauty of arguing sports, you can't really know for sure. I'd say Brees makes those guys look really good like Manning makes his look really good. Pretty much everybody who could be considered among the best of what they do has guys around them who are very good and play a large role in it.
_________________ "Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires." -- John Steinbeck
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 20059 Gender: Male
Buffalohed wrote:
dkfan9 wrote:
when talking about best team ever, are we saying regardless of context of era (ie 07 pats would beat 85 bears if they played, something like that) or within the era they played, how they played against that competition?
it makes no sense to compare it out of context, because in that case the teams of the 70s would all completely suck ass and the Lions would probably stop the SB champs from that era. Not to mention teams from the 30s and 40s, which would get beat by Division 5 college teams.
yeah, i agree with a lot of it, which is why i asked. saying the pats were the best team of all time is a huge claim, overlooking the aforementioned bears team for one, but also multiple other great teams (72 dolphins, 23 bulldogs, etc). not sure about the lions beating 70s sb champs though. then again the steelers line was out doing lines of coke thursday night before beating dallas in the super bowl back then (well, if you can trust a former coke runner to be telling the truth) so who knows.
_________________ stop light plays its part, so I would say you've got a part
i think as far as talent and dedication is concerned, Brees is as good or better than Manning and Brady. he's just a few years behind. i think as long as he stays healthy he will be a lock for the Hof in a couple years. The defense held him back fromt he national spotlight for a few years, but he was still shredding opposing defenses.
maybe i overrate Manning a little because he is basically the Offensive coordinator of that team, but how important is that? Brady may just be a quarterback and not the supreme master of the offense, but who says he needs to be? is a team better off that way? Just be a good QB.
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 11:36 pm Posts: 25824 Location: south jersey
bmacsmith wrote:
maybe i overrate Manning a little because he is basically the Offensive coordinator of that team, but how important is that? Brady may just be a quarterback and not the supreme master of the offense, but who says he needs to be? is a team better off that way? Just be a good QB.
its incredibly important. its bascially unprecedented
_________________ Feel the path of every day,... Which road you taking?,...
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 20059 Gender: Male
warehouse wrote:
bmacsmith wrote:
maybe i overrate Manning a little because he is basically the Offensive coordinator of that team, but how important is that? Brady may just be a quarterback and not the supreme master of the offense, but who says he needs to be? is a team better off that way? Just be a good QB.
its incredibly important. its bascially unprecedented
you mean in today's game right?
_________________ stop light plays its part, so I would say you've got a part
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 20059 Gender: Male
bmacsmith wrote:
Electromatic wrote:
Why don't the 89 49ers get more love?
They were coming off of that fantastic championship season the previous year over the Bengals and they completely dismantle the Elway led Broncos.
That was a freaking ridiculous team.
that 94 team when they added Ricky Jackson and Deion Sanders was ridiculous too
since i'm a 49ers fan i didnt want to mention them. also, i figured i needed to get the canton bulldogs in there somewhere and 3 teams in that parentheses would've been too much.
_________________ stop light plays its part, so I would say you've got a part
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 11:36 pm Posts: 25824 Location: south jersey
dkfan9 wrote:
warehouse wrote:
bmacsmith wrote:
maybe i overrate Manning a little because he is basically the Offensive coordinator of that team, but how important is that? Brady may just be a quarterback and not the supreme master of the offense, but who says he needs to be? is a team better off that way? Just be a good QB.
its incredibly important. its bascially unprecedented
you mean in today's game right?
didnt we go over the "dont compare eras" a few posts ago? comparing the play calling now to 30-40 years ago is pointless
_________________ Feel the path of every day,... Which road you taking?,...
maybe i overrate Manning a little because he is basically the Offensive coordinator of that team, but how important is that? Brady may just be a quarterback and not the supreme master of the offense, but who says he needs to be? is a team better off that way? Just be a good QB.
its incredibly important. its bascially unprecedented
you mean in today's game right?
didnt we go over the "dont compare eras" a few posts ago? comparing the play calling now to 30-40 years ago is pointless
Regardless, how Manning plays QB and runs that team is pretty much without parallel ever. It's why he's the best quarterback I've ever seen.
_________________ "Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires." -- John Steinbeck
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum