Red Mosquito http://archive.theskyiscrape.com/ |
|
The Official 2011 College Football Thread http://archive.theskyiscrape.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=95768 |
Page 27 of 29 |
Author: | Electromatic [ Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Official 2011 College Football Thread |
Orpheus wrote: A fucking colossal joke of a football program and fanbase that will only continue to embarrass themselves in the SEC. This is about Georgia right? |
Author: | Monkey_Driven [ Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Official 2011 College Football Thread |
I do not understand college teams that play for a field goal like Stanford did last night. Go for the kill! |
Author: | Electromatic [ Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Official 2011 College Football Thread |
Monkey_Driven wrote: I do not understand college teams that play for a field goal like Stanford did last night. Go for the kill! Kickers should be ignored until the ball is inside the 15 yard line. Kickers are the scourge of football, a false sense of security for ultra conservative coaches. Punting and Kicking are shite. Have some freaking testicles. |
Author: | Monkey_Driven [ Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Official 2011 College Football Thread |
Electromatic wrote: Monkey_Driven wrote: I do not understand college teams that play for a field goal like Stanford did last night. Go for the kill! Kickers should be ignored until the ball is inside the 15 yard line. Kickers are the scourge of football, a false sense of security for ultra conservative coaches. Punting and Kicking are shite. Have some freaking testicles. The NFL is one thing, but this kid was like 19 years old. Let your Number 1 overall pick QB punch it in for the TD. I was kind of hoping for the OK State kicker to miss it in OT just to show both coaches they needed to grow a pair. |
Author: | EllisEamos [ Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:21 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Official 2011 College Football Thread |
first and goal from the 4, and my boy runs back to the 25? why not attempt to throw it away as if it was a botched hb-option? |
Author: | Electromatic [ Wed Jan 04, 2012 2:31 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Official 2011 College Football Thread |
EllisEamos wrote: first and goal from the 4, and my boy runs back to the 25? why not attempt to throw it away as if it was a botched hb-option? you must be watching the cash grab before the big game in the superdome eh? |
Author: | 4/5 [ Wed Jan 04, 2012 2:55 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Official 2011 College Football Thread |
I love the flat black OKState helmets. Perfection. |
Author: | Chris_H_2 [ Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:39 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Official 2011 College Football Thread |
Holy crap this game is sloppy . . . |
Author: | Monkey_Driven [ Wed Jan 04, 2012 4:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Official 2011 College Football Thread |
The ACC is now 2-12 in BCS games. |
Author: | lennytheweedwhacker [ Wed Jan 04, 2012 4:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Official 2011 College Football Thread |
Monkey_Driven wrote: The ACC is now 2-12 in BCS games. Might as well pull their automatic bid and give the SEC an extra one. |
Author: | Monkey_Driven [ Wed Jan 04, 2012 5:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Official 2011 College Football Thread |
lennytheweedwhacker wrote: Monkey_Driven wrote: The ACC is now 2-12 in BCS games. Might as well pull their automatic bid and give the SEC an extra one. Or just scrap automatic bids all together. Top 10 teams get a BCS bowl. But, that would never work. |
Author: | lennytheweedwhacker [ Wed Jan 04, 2012 5:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Official 2011 College Football Thread |
Monkey_Driven wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: Monkey_Driven wrote: The ACC is now 2-12 in BCS games. Might as well pull their automatic bid and give the SEC an extra one. Or just scrap automatic bids all together. Top 10 teams get a BCS bowl. But, that would never work. Or just have Alabama play Missouri in the championship game every year. |
Author: | Green Habit [ Wed Jan 04, 2012 6:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Official 2011 College Football Thread |
Monkey_Driven wrote: Or just scrap automatic bids all together. Top 10 teams get a BCS bowl. But, that would never work. It sounds like the first part is going to happen. Sadly the second part likely won't happen, as the bowls are going to want a way to cram a 14th ranked Notre Dame into on of their games.
|
Author: | Monkey_Driven [ Wed Jan 04, 2012 7:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Official 2011 College Football Thread |
lennytheweedwhacker wrote: Monkey_Driven wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: Monkey_Driven wrote: The ACC is now 2-12 in BCS games. Might as well pull their automatic bid and give the SEC an extra one. Or just scrap automatic bids all together. Top 10 teams get a BCS bowl. But, that would never work. Or just have Alabama play Missouri in the championship game every year. You coming up the Columbia this year for the game? You can crash in my garage. |
Author: | lennytheweedwhacker [ Wed Jan 04, 2012 7:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Official 2011 College Football Thread |
Monkey_Driven wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: Monkey_Driven wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: Monkey_Driven wrote: The ACC is now 2-12 in BCS games. Might as well pull their automatic bid and give the SEC an extra one. Or just scrap automatic bids all together. Top 10 teams get a BCS bowl. But, that would never work. Or just have Alabama play Missouri in the championship game every year. You coming up the Columbia this year for the game? You can crash in my garage. Yeah. That will probably happen. We can rent War Horse and watch it too. |
Author: | Monkey_Driven [ Wed Jan 04, 2012 7:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Official 2011 College Football Thread |
lennytheweedwhacker wrote: Monkey_Driven wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: Monkey_Driven wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: Monkey_Driven wrote: The ACC is now 2-12 in BCS games. Might as well pull their automatic bid and give the SEC an extra one. Or just scrap automatic bids all together. Top 10 teams get a BCS bowl. But, that would never work. Or just have Alabama play Missouri in the championship game every year. You coming up the Columbia this year for the game? You can crash in my garage. Yeah. That will probably happen. We can rent War Horse and watch it too. Fantastic! |
Author: | Chris_H_2 [ Thu Jan 05, 2012 3:18 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Official 2011 College Football Thread |
Nice close, compelling game we got here. |
Author: | Green Habit [ Thu Jan 05, 2012 3:24 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Official 2011 College Football Thread |
Chris_H_2 wrote: Nice close, compelling game we got here. We had quite a few nailbiters in the past couple of days, we were bound for a clunker eventually.
|
Author: | Chris_H_2 [ Thu Jan 05, 2012 4:31 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Official 2011 College Football Thread |
Green Habit wrote: Chris_H_2 wrote: Nice close, compelling game we got here. We had quite a few nailbiters in the past couple of days, we were bound for a clunker eventually.I guess I just expected Clemson to play some defense. |
Author: | Electromatic [ Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Official 2011 College Football Thread |
Maybe stick to basketball from now on ACC. (Temple...oh wait) Also, Kevin Steele, SERIOUSLY???? Clemson sucked all year on defense and THAT's what you come up with after a month????? He cannot be employed further. I don't care that they won the ACC. |
Page 27 of 29 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |