Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:08 am Posts: 22978 Gender: Male
Self Polluted wrote:
Skitch Patterson wrote:
Self Polluted wrote:
Skitch Patterson wrote:
Self Polluted wrote:
I just saved mine without issue.
Awesome, thanks for the heads up. When I checked earlier, it acted like there was 5 games, and the Confidence point options were like 16, 12.4, 9.8, 6.2 and 3.4.
A 71 point lead is going to be really difficult to lose, penis.
Id rather not tempt fate. Points or not, I am really happy with my record against the spread. If i do it again next year, I may actually gamble money.
I'm really happy with my record against the spread, too. Anything over .500 when Vegas is involved is a success.
yep. It probably would have been better had I understood the rules. I was making my picks really early ever week trying to take advantage of the early spreads.
Awesome, thanks for the heads up. When I checked earlier, it acted like there was 5 games, and the Confidence point options were like 16, 12.4, 9.8, 6.2 and 3.4.
A 71 point lead is going to be really difficult to lose, penis.
Id rather not tempt fate. Points or not, I am really happy with my record against the spread. If i do it again next year, I may actually gamble money.
I'm really happy with my record against the spread, too. Anything over .500 when Vegas is involved is a success.
yep. It probably would have been better had I understood the rules. I was making my picks really early ever week trying to take advantage of the early spreads.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:08 am Posts: 22978 Gender: Male
Self Polluted wrote:
Skitch Patterson wrote:
Self Polluted wrote:
Skitch Patterson wrote:
Self Polluted wrote:
Skitch Patterson wrote:
Self Polluted wrote:
I just saved mine without issue.
Awesome, thanks for the heads up. When I checked earlier, it acted like there was 5 games, and the Confidence point options were like 16, 12.4, 9.8, 6.2 and 3.4.
A 71 point lead is going to be really difficult to lose, penis.
Id rather not tempt fate. Points or not, I am really happy with my record against the spread. If i do it again next year, I may actually gamble money.
I'm really happy with my record against the spread, too. Anything over .500 when Vegas is involved is a success.
yep. It probably would have been better had I understood the rules. I was making my picks really early ever week trying to take advantage of the early spreads.
Fwiw, that works when you're in Vegas.
That's how i always thought it worked. I found out in this thread like 2 weeks ago that I was doing it wrong.
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 3:28 am Posts: 28541 Location: PORTLAND, ME
Skitch Patterson wrote:
Self Polluted wrote:
Skitch Patterson wrote:
Self Polluted wrote:
Skitch Patterson wrote:
Self Polluted wrote:
Skitch Patterson wrote:
Self Polluted wrote:
I just saved mine without issue.
Awesome, thanks for the heads up. When I checked earlier, it acted like there was 5 games, and the Confidence point options were like 16, 12.4, 9.8, 6.2 and 3.4.
A 71 point lead is going to be really difficult to lose, penis.
Id rather not tempt fate. Points or not, I am really happy with my record against the spread. If i do it again next year, I may actually gamble money.
I'm really happy with my record against the spread, too. Anything over .500 when Vegas is involved is a success.
yep. It probably would have been better had I understood the rules. I was making my picks really early ever week trying to take advantage of the early spreads.
Fwiw, that works when you're in Vegas.
That's how i always thought it worked. I found out in this thread like 2 weeks ago that I was doing it wrong.
so you would have done worse had you known what you were doing?
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:08 am Posts: 22978 Gender: Male
EllisEamos wrote:
Skitch Patterson wrote:
Self Polluted wrote:
Skitch Patterson wrote:
Self Polluted wrote:
Skitch Patterson wrote:
Self Polluted wrote:
Skitch Patterson wrote:
Self Polluted wrote:
I just saved mine without issue.
Awesome, thanks for the heads up. When I checked earlier, it acted like there was 5 games, and the Confidence point options were like 16, 12.4, 9.8, 6.2 and 3.4.
A 71 point lead is going to be really difficult to lose, penis.
Id rather not tempt fate. Points or not, I am really happy with my record against the spread. If i do it again next year, I may actually gamble money.
I'm really happy with my record against the spread, too. Anything over .500 when Vegas is involved is a success.
yep. It probably would have been better had I understood the rules. I was making my picks really early ever week trying to take advantage of the early spreads.
Fwiw, that works when you're in Vegas.
That's how i always thought it worked. I found out in this thread like 2 weeks ago that I was doing it wrong.
so you would have done worse had you known what you were doing?
that sounds like vegas.
No, i would have done better. There were games that were "off" when I picked them, that ended up with 10-12 pt spreads that would have changed my pick- for the better.
For the record, "off," means it's off the board in Vegas, and they aren't accepting any bets. Usually has to do with a key players status being unknown, or something similar.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:08 am Posts: 22978 Gender: Male
Self Polluted wrote:
For the record, "off," means it's off the board in Vegas, and they aren't accepting any bets. Usually has to do with a key players status being unknown, or something similar.
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 3:28 am Posts: 28541 Location: PORTLAND, ME
Skitch Patterson wrote:
No, i would have done better. There were games that were "off" when I picked them, that ended up with 10-12 pt spreads that would have changed my pick- for the better.
For the record, "off," means it's off the board in Vegas, and they aren't accepting any bets. Usually has to do with a key players status being unknown, or something similar.
If I go to Vegas, you're coming with me.
RM DAD CONVENTION !
In. I can sell a dad convention a lot easier than an extravaganza.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:08 am Posts: 22978 Gender: Male
Self Polluted wrote:
Skitch Patterson wrote:
Self Polluted wrote:
For the record, "off," means it's off the board in Vegas, and they aren't accepting any bets. Usually has to do with a key players status being unknown, or something similar.
If I go to Vegas, you're coming with me.
RM DAD CONVENTION !
In. I can sell a dad convention a lot easier than an extravaganza.
Yes, because a bunch of married dads with no social life to speak of anymore are far more likely to behave when alcohol and strippers are introduced into the equation.
For the record, "off," means it's off the board in Vegas, and they aren't accepting any bets. Usually has to do with a key players status being unknown, or something similar.
If I go to Vegas, you're coming with me.
RM DAD CONVENTION !
In. I can sell a dad convention a lot easier than an extravaganza.
Yes, because a bunch of married dads with no social life to speak of anymore are far more likely to behave when alcohol and strippers are introduced into the equation.
It's been a really long time since I've been to a strip club.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
