Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:15 pm Posts: 25452 Location: Under my wing like Sanford & Son Gender: Male
I also think height is a little overrated for WRs. I'd rather have a 6'1" guy who runs great routes and has YAC ability than a 6'4" guy who's really stiff and possession only.
_________________ Now that god no longer exists, the desire for another world still remains.
also, could it be that they (the Pats) used both picks b/c nobody would trade into next year w/ them?
i think it's likely they just saw the draft as (relatively) top-heavy. they signed a lot of guys who could round out the roster (45-53 guys) in FA, probably because the draft wasn't as deep as they'd prefer.
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 3:28 am Posts: 28541 Location: PORTLAND, ME
if we had gone into the third w/ our draft, i was going to say that Kendricks was a player i really liked. he seems like a "little-ball of hate."
thodoks wrote:
EllisEamos wrote:
also, could it be that they (the Pats) used both picks b/c nobody would trade into next year w/ them?
i think it's likely they just saw the draft as (relatively) top-heavy. they signed a lot of guys who could round out the roster (45-53 guys) in FA, probably because the draft wasn't as deep as they'd prefer.
i was thinking that also, but i'd like to think that the other 31 teams colluded to end the reign of "trade down belichick."
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum