Red Mosquito http://archive.theskyiscrape.com/ |
|
TEBOW http://archive.theskyiscrape.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=96629 |
Page 4 of 8 |
Author: | tree_ [ Mon Jan 09, 2012 4:58 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: TEBOW |
Impressive. Suddenly he can actually 'throw' the ball. 'Be neat if he could keep it up. |
Author: | Orpheus [ Mon Jan 09, 2012 5:34 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: TEBOW |
That last pass was an absolute dime and the other deep balls weren't bad either. Doesn't hurt that Thomas looks to be an absolute stud.
|
Author: | 4/5 [ Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: TEBOW |
Lots of today. |
Author: | Electromatic [ Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: TEBOW |
He made some excellent passes yesterday. Honestly, if he can ever figure out throwing the ball, he's a more athletic Rothlisburger. Rothlisburger makes some of the best (and worst) plays in the game including some unbelieveably fantastic throws in the 4th quarter yesterday. Tebow like Rothlisburger is brilliant at buying time, Tim just has to get the whole throwing to a spot and or the correct shoulder thing down and they will win a lot more like this. The throws to Royal in the endzone and down the sideline to Bebe were nearly perfect. |
Author: | Peeps [ Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: TEBOW |
i love sports talk radio on days like this every excuse under the sun other than, the defense dared him to pass and he excelled at it |
Author: | Monkey_Driven [ Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: TEBOW |
That game was awesome. I'm glad there a close game this weekend. |
Author: | Electromatic [ Mon Jan 09, 2012 3:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: TEBOW |
Tebow 1 Dick Lebeau 0 Final. |
Author: | Green Habit [ Tue Jan 10, 2012 3:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: TEBOW |
Author: | EllisEamos [ Tue Jan 10, 2012 11:30 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: TEBOW |
Green Habit wrote: they love them some Tebow Ratings. |
Author: | Green Habit [ Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: TEBOW |
Author: | EllisEamos [ Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: TEBOW |
Green Habit wrote: alright, enough is a fuckin' 'nough.i'll be at the game saturday night, and i'mma let you finish, but Randle Cunningham was the best running/throwing QB of all time!! |
Author: | dkfan9 [ Tue Jan 10, 2012 10:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: TEBOW |
EllisEamos wrote: Green Habit wrote: alright, enough is a fuckin' 'nough.i'll be at the game saturday night, and i'mma let you finish, but Randle Cunningham was the best running/throwing QB of all time!! steve young? |
Author: | EllisEamos [ Tue Jan 10, 2012 10:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: TEBOW |
Author: | Electromatic [ Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: TEBOW |
Ha, somebody lost a bet. |
Author: | EllisEamos [ Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: TEBOW |
Electromatic wrote: Ha, somebody lost a bet. i wonder if Mumbles would be able to fit in a jersey. |
Author: | Electromatic [ Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: TEBOW |
http://www.cafepress.com/slipsts something to do on Sunday's after the Superbowl. |
Author: | EllisEamos [ Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: TEBOW |
I heard them talking about this on the radio, so I decided to look into it for both teams. Basically, a caller to the Big Show asked about any perceived advantage to playing Tebow a second time. Its a very small sample size, as Kansas City was the only team that faced the Tebow led Broncos twice, but below gives a rough idea of how they did in the first game (G1) and the second (G2). KansasCity----------------G1 (@)---------G2 Result------------------17-10,W--------7-3,L (Den) Rushing For (att)----244 (55)--------216 (47) (Den) Rushing Against----134 (24)--------106 (30) (Den) Passing For (att)------69 (8)---------60 (22) (Den) Passing Against-----140 (34)-------175 (29) (Den) Turnovers--------0 fum, 0 int------1 fum, 1 int (Den) Sacks For-------------4-------------1 (Den) T.O.P.--------------33:38----------32:58 I then did the same for the Patriots against their division this year: Miami--------------------G1 (@)---------G2 Result------------------38-24,W-------27-24,W (NE) Rushing For (att)-----106 (22)--------119 (31) (NE) Rushing Against------98 (20)--------121 (28) (NE) Passing For (att)------517 (48)-------304 (46) (NE) Passing Against------416 (49)-------281 (32) (NE) Turnovers----------0 fum, 1 int----0 fum, 0 int (NE) Sacks For-------------4---------------5 (NE) T.O.P.--------------28:27-----------32:56 Buffalo-------------------G1 (@)---------G2 Result------------------34-31,L-------49-21,W (NE) Rushing For (att)-----108 (26)-------138 (29) (NE) Rushing Against------79 (20)-------106 (20) (NE) Passing For (att)-----387 (45)--------360 (36) (NE) Passing Against------369 (40)-------307 (46) (NE) Turnovers----------0 fum, 4 int----0 fum, 1 int (NE) Sacks For--------------4--------------2 (NE) T.O.P.---------------31:15----------29:38 New York-----------------G1------------G2 (@) Result------------------30-21,W-------37-16,W (NE) Rushing For (att)-----152 (35)--------60 (28) (NE) Rushing Against------97 (25)--------110 (25) (NE) Passing For (att)------321 (33)-------329 (39) (NE) Passing Against------166 (26)-------306 (39) (NE) Turnovers----------0 fum, 1 int----0 fum, 0 int (NE) Sacks For--------------2-------------5 (NE) T.O.P.---------------33:55----------30:07 |
Author: | Spike [ Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:28 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: TEBOW |
http://www.latenightwithjimmyfallon.com ... w-tebowie/ |
Author: | whygodeep [ Fri Jan 13, 2012 6:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: TEBOW |
Spike wrote: http://www.latenightwithjimmyfallon.com/blogs/2012/01/david-bowie-tim-tebow-tebowie/ |
Author: | Monkey_Driven [ Fri Jan 13, 2012 7:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: TEBOW |
whygodeep wrote: Spike wrote: http://www.latenightwithjimmyfallon.com/blogs/2012/01/david-bowie-tim-tebow-tebowie/ |
Page 4 of 8 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |