| Red Mosquito http://archive.theskyiscrape.com/ |
|
| 2012 College Football http://archive.theskyiscrape.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=99191 |
Page 3 of 11 |
| Author: | lennytheweedwhacker [ Fri Sep 07, 2012 2:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2012 College Football |
washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: That's when a coach selects six players to come out of the game, right? I'm new to NCAAF  Correct. Similar to a line change in hockey. Is there a stat for standing tackles versus diving tackles in this sport? Not that i'm aware of. Why would that matter? |
|
| Author: | darth_vedder [ Fri Sep 07, 2012 3:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2012 College Football |
Electromatic wrote: Orpheus wrote: Bummed that Auburn and Malzahn parted ways. I have no interest in watching another boring SEC I-form/Singleback team. I invite you into the Perfect Option and Georgia Tech. 2yds 2yds 3yds 2yds -5yds Pass 20 ft over the receiver, 40 yd run, 1 yd -3 yds.... This is a very accurate description. I effing hate it (only b/c they have beaten Clemson the last few years). |
|
| Author: | washing machine [ Fri Sep 07, 2012 7:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2012 College Football |
lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: That's when a coach selects six players to come out of the game, right? I'm new to NCAAF Correct. Similar to a line change in hockey. Is there a stat for standing tackles versus diving tackles in this sport? Not that i'm aware of. Why would that matter? When I'm assessing weekly matchups, I think knowing who my power guys are would be helpful. |
|
| Author: | lennytheweedwhacker [ Fri Sep 07, 2012 7:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2012 College Football |
washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: That's when a coach selects six players to come out of the game, right? I'm new to NCAAF Correct. Similar to a line change in hockey. Is there a stat for standing tackles versus diving tackles in this sport? Not that i'm aware of. Why would that matter? When I'm assessing weekly matchups, I think knowing who my power guys are would be helpful. Regular tackles as opposed to diving tackles are purely circumstantial. I don't think it should have any bearing on your selections. |
|
| Author: | washing machine [ Fri Sep 07, 2012 8:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2012 College Football |
lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: That's when a coach selects six players to come out of the game, right? I'm new to NCAAF Correct. Similar to a line change in hockey. Is there a stat for standing tackles versus diving tackles in this sport? Not that i'm aware of. Why would that matter? When I'm assessing weekly matchups, I think knowing who my power guys are would be helpful. Regular tackles as opposed to diving tackles are purely circumstantial. I don't think it should have any bearing on your selections. The truly great powerhouses will always make a standing tackle. |
|
| Author: | lennytheweedwhacker [ Fri Sep 07, 2012 8:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2012 College Football |
washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: That's when a coach selects six players to come out of the game, right? I'm new to NCAAF Correct. Similar to a line change in hockey. Is there a stat for standing tackles versus diving tackles in this sport? Not that i'm aware of. Why would that matter? When I'm assessing weekly matchups, I think knowing who my power guys are would be helpful. Regular tackles as opposed to diving tackles are purely circumstantial. I don't think it should have any bearing on your selections. The truly great powerhouses will always make a standing tackle. Can you back up this asinine assertion with statistics? |
|
| Author: | washing machine [ Fri Sep 07, 2012 8:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2012 College Football |
lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: That's when a coach selects six players to come out of the game, right? I'm new to NCAAF Correct. Similar to a line change in hockey. Is there a stat for standing tackles versus diving tackles in this sport? Not that i'm aware of. Why would that matter? When I'm assessing weekly matchups, I think knowing who my power guys are would be helpful. Regular tackles as opposed to diving tackles are purely circumstantial. I don't think it should have any bearing on your selections. The truly great powerhouses will always make a standing tackle. Can you back up this asinine assertion with statistics? Of course not. |
|
| Author: | lennytheweedwhacker [ Fri Sep 07, 2012 8:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2012 College Football |
washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: That's when a coach selects six players to come out of the game, right? I'm new to NCAAF Correct. Similar to a line change in hockey. Is there a stat for standing tackles versus diving tackles in this sport? Not that i'm aware of. Why would that matter? When I'm assessing weekly matchups, I think knowing who my power guys are would be helpful. Regular tackles as opposed to diving tackles are purely circumstantial. I don't think it should have any bearing on your selections. The truly great powerhouses will always make a standing tackle. Can you back up this asinine assertion with statistics? Of course not. I didn't know who to pick in the Texas A&M/Florida battle. |
|
| Author: | washing machine [ Fri Sep 07, 2012 8:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2012 College Football |
lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: That's when a coach selects six players to come out of the game, right? I'm new to NCAAF Correct. Similar to a line change in hockey. Is there a stat for standing tackles versus diving tackles in this sport? Not that i'm aware of. Why would that matter? When I'm assessing weekly matchups, I think knowing who my power guys are would be helpful. Regular tackles as opposed to diving tackles are purely circumstantial. I don't think it should have any bearing on your selections. The truly great powerhouses will always make a standing tackle. Can you back up this asinine assertion with statistics? Of course not. I didn't know who to pick in the Texas A&M/Florida battle. If the aggies win, it will be because of Kyle Field. I picked them but only assigned 1 confidence point. |
|
| Author: | lennytheweedwhacker [ Fri Sep 07, 2012 8:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2012 College Football |
washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: That's when a coach selects six players to come out of the game, right? I'm new to NCAAF Correct. Similar to a line change in hockey. Is there a stat for standing tackles versus diving tackles in this sport? Not that i'm aware of. Why would that matter? When I'm assessing weekly matchups, I think knowing who my power guys are would be helpful. Regular tackles as opposed to diving tackles are purely circumstantial. I don't think it should have any bearing on your selections. The truly great powerhouses will always make a standing tackle. Can you back up this asinine assertion with statistics? Of course not. I didn't know who to pick in the Texas A&M/Florida battle. If the aggies win, it will be because of Kyle Field. I picked them but only assigned 1 confidence point. Confidence points really make pick em's interesting, huh? |
|
| Author: | washing machine [ Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2012 College Football |
lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: That's when a coach selects six players to come out of the game, right? I'm new to NCAAF Correct. Similar to a line change in hockey. Is there a stat for standing tackles versus diving tackles in this sport? Not that i'm aware of. Why would that matter? When I'm assessing weekly matchups, I think knowing who my power guys are would be helpful. Regular tackles as opposed to diving tackles are purely circumstantial. I don't think it should have any bearing on your selections. The truly great powerhouses will always make a standing tackle. Can you back up this asinine assertion with statistics? Of course not. I didn't know who to pick in the Texas A&M/Florida battle. If the aggies win, it will be because of Kyle Field. I picked them but only assigned 1 confidence point. Confidence points really make pick em's interesting, huh? I wouldn't be doing this without them. |
|
| Author: | lennytheweedwhacker [ Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2012 College Football |
washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: That's when a coach selects six players to come out of the game, right? I'm new to NCAAF Correct. Similar to a line change in hockey. Is there a stat for standing tackles versus diving tackles in this sport? Not that i'm aware of. Why would that matter? When I'm assessing weekly matchups, I think knowing who my power guys are would be helpful. Regular tackles as opposed to diving tackles are purely circumstantial. I don't think it should have any bearing on your selections. The truly great powerhouses will always make a standing tackle. Can you back up this asinine assertion with statistics? Of course not. I didn't know who to pick in the Texas A&M/Florida battle. If the aggies win, it will be because of Kyle Field. I picked them but only assigned 1 confidence point. Confidence points really make pick em's interesting, huh? I wouldn't be doing this without them. It's better for the NFL I think. Too many one-sided games in college. |
|
| Author: | washing machine [ Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2012 College Football |
lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: lennytheweedwhacker wrote: washing machine wrote: That's when a coach selects six players to come out of the game, right? I'm new to NCAAF Correct. Similar to a line change in hockey. Is there a stat for standing tackles versus diving tackles in this sport? Not that i'm aware of. Why would that matter? When I'm assessing weekly matchups, I think knowing who my power guys are would be helpful. Regular tackles as opposed to diving tackles are purely circumstantial. I don't think it should have any bearing on your selections. The truly great powerhouses will always make a standing tackle. Can you back up this asinine assertion with statistics? Of course not. I didn't know who to pick in the Texas A&M/Florida battle. If the aggies win, it will be because of Kyle Field. I picked them but only assigned 1 confidence point. Confidence points really make pick em's interesting, huh? I wouldn't be doing this without them. It's better for the NFL I think. Too many one-sided games in college. Do you know if Alex still plays MLB pick 'em? |
|
| Author: | Monkey_Driven [ Sat Sep 08, 2012 4:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2012 College Football |
Game day... Ribs, beer, and football will be consumed. |
|
| Author: | thodoks [ Sat Sep 08, 2012 5:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2012 College Football |
touchbacks come back to the 25 now? WTF? |
|
| Author: | Rebar [ Sat Sep 08, 2012 5:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2012 College Football |
I may actually root for the Gamec*cks this year. |
|
| Author: | Orpheus [ Sat Sep 08, 2012 5:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2012 College Football |
thodoks wrote: touchbacks come back to the 25 now? WTF? Weird. Although I guess it kinda makes sense with the overtime rules and what not. |
|
| Author: | thodoks [ Sat Sep 08, 2012 6:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2012 College Football |
holy shit is auburn bad |
|
| Author: | Orpheus [ Sat Sep 08, 2012 6:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2012 College Football |
thodoks wrote: holy shit is auburn bad Even worse, they're boring as shit. If you're gonna be bad you should at least be wacky about it. |
|
| Author: | thodoks [ Sat Sep 08, 2012 6:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 2012 College Football |
yeah i don't really give a shit whether they play an entertaining brand of football, so long as it's successful |
|
| Page 3 of 11 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|