corduroy_blazer wrote:
so...are they good?
Yeah, they're quite good.
| Red Mosquito http://archive.theskyiscrape.com/ |
|
| Foo Fighters http://archive.theskyiscrape.com/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=13313 |
Page 2 of 4 |
| Author: | Drunkenapparatus [ Sun Apr 10, 2005 11:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Alright so I just got The Color and Something about Airplanes The Color is alright Airplanes is godly, President of What is amazing D-Cab rules |
|
| Author: | Lloyd Dobler [ Sun Apr 10, 2005 11:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Foo Fighters are great. Solid, hard rock/pop efforts on every album. I really got into One by One for being a tad more aggressive than previous efforts. The next release should be good and interesting. Dave Grohl is very talented. God bless, Jared |
|
| Author: | corduroy_blazer [ Sat Jun 10, 2006 6:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
so...are they good? |
|
| Author: | LostDog1079 [ Sat Jun 10, 2006 6:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
corduroy_blazer wrote: so...are they good?
Yeah, they're quite good.
|
|
| Author: | corduroy_blazer [ Sat Jun 10, 2006 6:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
LostDog1079 wrote: corduroy_blazer wrote: so...are they good? Yeah, they're quite good. i own nothing of the foo fighters. |
|
| Author: | LostDog1079 [ Sat Jun 10, 2006 6:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
corduroy_blazer wrote: LostDog1079 wrote: corduroy_blazer wrote: so...are they good? Yeah, they're quite good. i own nothing of the foo fighters. If anything, get The Colour & The Shape. You can thank me later. |
|
| Author: | Veddar10 [ Mon Jun 12, 2006 2:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
inadvertent imitation wrote: Garden of Stone wrote: Here's some advice from Pluggedin.com The Colour and the Shape Though vague, "Monkey Wrench" could be interpreted as the frustrations of a teen whose parents refuse to accept his homosexuality. God damn. Where do these psychos come up with this shit? it wasn't hard to figure out once you realize that Stone wrote "Monkey Wrench" |
|
| Author: | MF [ Mon Jun 12, 2006 2:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
corduroy_blazer wrote: LostDog1079 wrote: corduroy_blazer wrote: so...are they good? Yeah, they're quite good. i own nothing of the foo fighters. Get the first two albums and pretend that's all they have, otherwise you will be in for a dissapointment. |
|
| Author: | CantKeepFukinUp [ Mon Jun 12, 2006 3:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Enough Space has been owning me lately. |
|
| Author: | LostDog1079 [ Mon Jun 12, 2006 3:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
CantKeepFukinUp wrote: Enough Space has been owning me lately.
That, "Wind Up" and "New Way Home" are my 3 favorites from TC&TS. |
|
| Author: | Garden of Stone [ Mon Jun 12, 2006 3:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
http://youtube.com/watch?v=iQwRUsLAS7E&search=everlong |
|
| Author: | mowbs [ Mon Jun 12, 2006 3:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
LostDog1079 wrote: corduroy_blazer wrote: so...are they good? Yeah, they're quite good. Yup. Dave Grohl's best band, if you ask me. |
|
| Author: | Mickey [ Mon Jun 12, 2006 4:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Lloyd Dobler wrote: Foo Fighters are great. Solid, hard rock/pop efforts on every album. I really got into One by One for being a tad more aggressive than previous efforts. The next release should be good and interesting. Dave Grohl is very talented.
God bless, Jared 
|
|
| Author: | Soma. [ Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
yeah, the double album sucked arse. i never listen to it. |
|
| Author: | 4/5 [ Tue Jun 13, 2006 1:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Citizen_Soma wrote: yeah, the double album sucked arse. i never listen to it.
would have been a GREAT 12 or 13 song album. i stand by that. 
|
|
| Author: | CantKeepFukinUp [ Tue Jun 13, 2006 3:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
aprilfifth wrote: Citizen_Soma wrote: yeah, the double album sucked arse. i never listen to it. would have been a GREAT 12 or 13 song album. i stand by that. yeah. there are some good songs on there. i actually like it. |
|
| Author: | Mickey [ Tue Jun 13, 2006 3:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
aprilfifth wrote: Citizen_Soma wrote: yeah, the double album sucked arse. i never listen to it. would have been a GREAT 12 or 13 song album. i stand by that. I completely agree. There are about 3-4 good tracks on the slower side, and about 7 good tracks on the fast one. If they had combined them, the slow stuff wouldn't have bored me and the harder stuff wouldn't have sounded so tired by the end. It could have been a hell of a record. |
|
| Author: | Soma. [ Tue Jun 13, 2006 5:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
i still think it would be their worst record to date if you crammed the "good songs" onto one disc. |
|
| Author: | Deano [ Tue Jun 13, 2006 9:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
aprilfifth wrote: Citizen_Soma wrote: yeah, the double album sucked arse. i never listen to it. would have been a GREAT 12 or 13 song album. i stand by that. I totally agree with this. Still/What if I do/Razor could be added to the first cd (and Cold Day in the Sun if Taylor has to have his moment) to make it a really good cd. |
|
| Author: | 4/5 [ Tue Jun 13, 2006 1:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
i think the majority of the songs were good, on an individual basis. but, as an album they start to blur. the "hard" songs started to all be the same, and while the acoustic side was good, it wasnt great. its hard to listen to an "okay" acoustic cd for too long. |
|
| Page 2 of 4 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|