Red Mosquito • View topic - Radiohead: Objectively & Subjectively better than Pink Floyd

zeb · **Joined:** Sun Oct 17, 2004 8:33 am **Posts:** 17101

Go on. You know it's true.

PeopleMyAge · **Posted:** Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:34 pm

zeb wrote:

Go on. You know it's true.

pink floyd started out artsy fartsy while tripping on LSD and then moved on to be artistic for awhile before selling out and writing love songs (thanks david gilmour).

radiohead started out radio friendly and has gone mostly in reverse (although this last record was more radio friendly than say Kid A

LostDog1079 · **Posted:** Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:43 pm

This will get ugly really fast. :lol:

Echoes · **Posted:** Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:00 pm

please explain

corduroy_blazer · **Posted:** Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:01 pm

if something is indeed objectively better, what's the use in saying it's also subjectively better?

zeb · **Joined:** Sun Oct 17, 2004 8:33 am **Posts:** 17101

corduroy_blazer wrote:

if something is indeed objectively better, what's the use in saying it's also subjectively better?

They mean different things, ceb.

corduroy_blazer · **Posted:** Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:19 pm

zeb wrote:

corduroy_blazer wrote:

if something is indeed objectively better, what's the use in saying it's also subjectively better?

They mean different things, ceb.

i'm not quite following here.

psychobain · **Posted:** Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:22 pm

denverapolis · **Posted:** Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:23 pm

zeb is saying not only does he think radiohead is better than floyd, he has indisputible evidence to back this up.

i say he's full of shit.

corduroy_blazer · **Posted:** Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:24 pm

denverapolis wrote:

zeb is saying not only does he think radiohead is better than floyd, he has indisputible evidence to back this up.

i say he's full of shit.

but if you have evidence proving radiohead is better than pink floyd for all to see, what's the use in saying "i think radiohead is better than pink floyd"?

zeb · **Joined:** Sun Oct 17, 2004 8:33 am **Posts:** 17101

Sometimes you have to think with your head and your heart, young man.

corduroy_blazer · **Posted:** Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:37 pm

zeb wrote:

Sometimes you have to think with your head and your heart, young man.

it doesn't really matter whether or not i feel evolution has happened if the evidence says it did, does it?

warehouse · **Posted:** Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:38 pm

denverapolis wrote:

zeb is saying not only does he think radiohead is better than floyd, he has indisputible evidence to back this up.

i say he's full of shit.

agreed and radiohead is my fav band

denverapolis · **Posted:** Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:41 pm

corduroy_blazer wrote:

denverapolis wrote:

zeb is saying not only does he think radiohead is better than floyd, he has indisputible evidence to back this up.

i say he's full of shit.

but if you have evidence proving radiohead is better than pink floyd for all to see, what's the use in saying "i think radiohead is better than pink floyd"?

because there are those that believe this anyway, without the proof.

EastHastings · **Joined:** Sat Dec 11, 2004 8:08 am **Posts:** 6583

I don't feel bad having not listened to either bands in months.

denverapolis · **Posted:** Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:51 pm

i do admire zeb for making this thread

Soma. · **Posted:** Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:07 pm

mastaflatch · **Posted:** Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:14 pm

dumb thread. Pink Floyd circa 66-69 ain't even the same band circa 71-77 and so on. anyway, both of them are way past their prime imo.

corduroy_blazer · **Posted:** Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:24 pm

denverapolis wrote:

i do admire zeb for making this thread

i have a feeling for many others, it would have been a flamefest.

BlueNote · **Posted:** Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:28 pm

i can't even think of a single point of argument to support such a statement as this

Radiohead: Objectively & Subjectively better than Pink Floyd

Who is online