Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:02 pm Posts: 1777 Location: Naperville, IL, USA Ten Club: 230xxx Gender: Male
I'm not going to say which team I am so as to not color the debate.
Team A has Jason Schmidt, Chris Young, Daniel Cabrera, Ervin Santana, and Francisco Liriano. Team B has Felix Hernandez, Zach Duke, Jeff Suppan, Brad Radke, Matt Clement, and Mark Prior.
League settings: 4 SP slots, 2 DL, 1 bench (for the entire team), W/L/SV/HLD/BB/ERA/K per 9/K:BB
A trade has been proposed by one of the teams sending Hernandez to team A and Schmidt and Young to team B.
Do you take this trade? Is one side benefitting more than the other?
_________________ Saw you at: 4/23/03, 6/13/03, 6/18/03, 9/28/04, 9/29/04, 10/5/04, 5/16/06, 5/17/06, EV 8/22/08, 8/23/09, 8/24/09, 10/31/09, 5/7/10, EV 6/28/11, 9/3/11, 9/4/11!
If I'm team A I like that deal. I never like giving up 2 for 1's, but Young won't hit near his #'s last year and Schmidt is overrated. King Felix will be amazing by the 2nd half.
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:02 pm Posts: 1777 Location: Naperville, IL, USA Ten Club: 230xxx Gender: Male
Here are the potential plusses and minuses for both sides, that I see:
Team A
++Gets the bonafide #1 SP they don't have - in theory.
+Opens up roster space (see rules, very limited in this league)
--Cannot replace either pitcher (no matter how you look at it) with similar quality from free agency/waivers
-Hernandez is having a shin splint issue
-Hernandez will not even turn 20 for 3 more days
-Two NL pitchers who are in pitchers parks for an AL pitcher
-Seattle isn't very good
-Mgmt has indicated they will "baby" him; does this mean extra rest? (e.g. fewer IP/game and more rest between starts, maybe shut down in Aug/Sep if IP are high and team is out of contention?)
Team B
+++Shores up very weak starting rotation, can drop one of the weaker pitchers
+As good as Hernandez is and his potential is, this is still a trade netting two front-of-the-rotation starters for one half prospect/half star.
-Leaves the roster with lots of potentially mediocre SP's
So I guess the benefits are more speculative for Team A with a lot of downside potential, and the benefits are more tangible for Team B with not a lot of outperformance potential. At least, that's how I see it.
_________________ Saw you at: 4/23/03, 6/13/03, 6/18/03, 9/28/04, 9/29/04, 10/5/04, 5/16/06, 5/17/06, EV 8/22/08, 8/23/09, 8/24/09, 10/31/09, 5/7/10, EV 6/28/11, 9/3/11, 9/4/11!
The only REAL problem I see is that team A is essentially trading for potential. While I think King Felix probably has more than anybody on the planet, you're still projecting. While Young won't be AL batting champ again, he'll still be solid. It's a tough decision for either side, and the more I look at it the more I don't like the deal for team A. Hmm...
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:02 pm Posts: 1777 Location: Naperville, IL, USA Ten Club: 230xxx Gender: Male
parchy wrote:
The only REAL problem I see is that team A is essentially trading for potential. While I think King Felix probably has more than anybody on the planet, you're still projecting. While Young won't be AL batting champ again, he'll still be solid. It's a tough decision for either side, and the more I look at it the more I don't like the deal for team A. Hmm...
AL batting champ?
Not Michael Young. Chris Young, pitcher who used to be on the Rangers
_________________ Saw you at: 4/23/03, 6/13/03, 6/18/03, 9/28/04, 9/29/04, 10/5/04, 5/16/06, 5/17/06, EV 8/22/08, 8/23/09, 8/24/09, 10/31/09, 5/7/10, EV 6/28/11, 9/3/11, 9/4/11!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
