Board index » Word on the Street... » News & Debate




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: 12 Dead in Attack at US Consulate in Saudi Arabia
PostPosted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 9:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Devil's Advocate
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:59 am
Posts: 18643
Location: Raleigh, NC
Gender: Male
JEDDAH, Saudi Arabia (Reuters) - Twelve people died when Muslim militants stormed the U.S. consulate in the Saudi city of Jeddah Monday, officials said.

Saudi security officials said four of their men were killed by the assailants. Security forces killed three attackers and wounded two, who were then captured.

A U.S. embassy spokeswoman said five non-American consulate staff, including a contract guard, had also been killed.

Earlier there was confusion about whether the five non-U.S. dead listed by the embassy had included the four dead guards.


***

Yay, happy fun Middle East Monday to everyone.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 9:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Former PJ Drummer
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:01 am
Posts: 19477
Location: Brooklyn NY
The excuse from the administration is that this will be part of the war on terror. Having taken our country to war, we will never actually know the alternative to a more diplomatic or peaceful solution. I have a hard time believing that a more passive approach would have lead to more violence that's occuring right now.

_________________
LittleWing sometime in July 2007 wrote:
Unfortunately, it's so elementary, and the big time investors behind the drive in the stock market aren't so stupid. This isn't the false economy of 2000.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 9:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Administrator
 Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:53 pm
Posts: 20537
Location: The City Of Trees
glorified_version wrote:
The excuse from the administration is that this will be part of the war on terror. Having taken our country to war, we will never actually know the alternative to a more diplomatic or peaceful solution. I have a hard time believing that a more passive approach would have lead to more violence that's occuring right now.


I'll play a bit of devil's advocate:

Some would say that the "more diplomatic or peaceful" solution was taken by President Clinton. However, the attacks continued to escalate, from the 1998 African embassy bombings, to the USS Cole, to Sept. 11th.

Also, when you say "Having taken our country" to war, are you referring to just Iraq, or Afghanistan as well?


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

Board index » Word on the Street... » News & Debate


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
It is currently Sun Nov 23, 2025 5:09 am