Board index » Word on the Street... » News & Debate




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 48 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: 20 Amazing Facts About Voting in America
PostPosted: Tue Dec 07, 2004 6:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Got Some
 Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:52 pm
Posts: 1727
Location: Earth
Gender: Male
Did you know....

1. 80% of all votes in America are counted by only two companies: Diebold and ES&S.

http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting/04 ... andes.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diebold

2. There is no federal agency with regulatory authority or oversight of the U.S. voting machine industry.

http://www.commondreams.org/views02/0916-04.htm

http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting/04 ... andes.html

3. The vice-president of Diebold and the president of ES&S are brothers.
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/p ... mpany.html

http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting/04 ... andes.html

4. The chairman and CEO of Diebold is a major Bush campaign organizer and donor who wrote in 2003 that he was "committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year."

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/07/ ... 2436.shtml

http://www.wishtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=1647886

5. Republican Senator Chuck Hagel used to be chairman of ES&S. He became Senator based on votes counted by ES&S machines.

http://www.motherjones.com/commentary/c ... 3_200.html

http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting/03 ... rakis.html

6. Republican Senator Chuck Hagel, long-connected with the Bush family, was recently caught lying about his ownership of ES&S by the Senate Ethics Committee.

http://www.blackboxvoting.com/modules.p ... cle&sid=26

http://www.hillnews.com/news/012903/hagel.aspx

http://www.onlisareinsradar.com/archives/000896.php

7. Senator Chuck Hagel was on a short list of George W. Bush's vice-presidential candidates.

http://www.businessweek.com/2000/00_28/b3689130.htm

http://theindependent.com/stories/05270 ... gel27.html

8. ES&S is the largest voting machine manufacturer in the U.S. and counts almost 60% of all U.S. votes.
http://www.essvote.com/HTML/about/about.html

http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting/04 ... andes.html

9. Diebold's new touch screen voting machines have no paper trail of any votes. In other words, there is no way to verify that the data coming out of the machine is the same as what was legitimately put in by voters.

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0225-05.htm

http://www.itworld.com/Tech/2987/041020 ... index.html

10. Diebold also makes ATMs, checkout scanners, and ticket machines, all of which log each transaction and can generate a paper trail.

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0225-05.htm

http://www.diebold.com/solutions/default.htm

11. Diebold is based in Ohio.
http://www.diebold.com/aboutus/ataglance/default.html

12. Diebold employed 5 convicted felons as senior managers and developers to help write the central compiler computer code that counted 50% of the votes in 30 states.

http://www.wired.com/news/evote/0,2645,61640,00.html

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/10/301469.shtml

13. Jeff Dean, Diebold's Senior Vice-President and senior programmer on Diebold's central compiler code, was convicted of 23 counts of felony theft in the first degree.

http://www.chuckherrin.com/HackthevoteFAQ.htm#how

http://www.blackboxvoting.org/bbv_chapter-8.pdf

14. Diebold Senior Vice-President Jeff Dean was convicted of planting back doors in his software and using a "high degree of sophistication" to evade detection over a period of 2 years.

http://www.chuckherrin.com/HackthevoteFAQ.htm#how

http://www.blackboxvoting.org/bbv_chapter-8.pdf

15. None of the international election observers were allowed in the polls in Ohio.

http://www.globalexchange.org/update/press/2638.html

http://www.enquirer.com/editions/2004/1 ... lexoh.html

16. California banned the use of Diebold machines because the security was so bad. Despite Diebold's claims that the audit logs could not be hacked, a chimpanzee was able to do it! (See the movie here)

http://wired.com/news/evote/0,2645,63298,00.html

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4874190

17. 30% of all U.S. votes are carried out on unverifiable touch screen voting machines with no paper trail.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/07/ ... 2436.shtml

18. All -- not some -- but all the voting machine errors detected and reported in Florida went in favor of Bush or Republican candidates.

http://www.wired.com/news/evote/0,2645,65757,00.html

http://www.yuricareport.com/ElectionAft ... hIsOut.htm

http://www.rise4news.net/extravotes.html

http://www.ilcaonline.org/modules.php?o ... le&sid=950

http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0411/S00227.htm

19. The governor of the state of Florida, Jeb Bush, is the President's brother.
http://www.tallahassee.com/mld/tallahas ... 628725.htm

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ar ... Oct29.html


20. Serious voting anomalies in Florida -- again always favoring Bush -- have been mathematically demonstrated and experts are recommending further investigation.

http://www.yuricareport.com/ElectionAft ... hIsOut.htm

http://www.computerworld.com/government ... 14,00.html

http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/t ... sands.html

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/1106-30.htm

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2004/110904.html

http://uscountvotes.org/

_________________
"The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum."
-Noam Chomsky


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 07, 2004 11:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Got Some
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:08 pm
Posts: 1018
Location: Oshkosh, WI
Some interesting statements, but the bottom line is that people who didn't want Bush reelected need to get over it. It's over with. Bush won.

_________________
Been to: 07/09/95...09/22/96...06/26/98...06/27/98...06/29/98...10/08/00...10/09/00...06/21/03...06/30/06


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 07, 2004 11:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Of Counsel
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:14 am
Posts: 37778
Location: OmaGOD!!!
Gender: Male
barefeet222 wrote:
Some interesting statements, but the bottom line is that people who didn't want Bush reelected need to get over it. It's over with. Bush won.


That's easy for you to say.

Would you continue to feel that way if all of these 2+2's ended up adding up to 4? If there were discovered a smoking gun on, let's say #14 above, would you still think we need to just get over it? Really?

--PunkDavid

_________________
Unfortunately, at the Dawning of the Age of Aquarius, the Flower Children jerked off and went back to sleep.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 12:14 am 
Offline
User avatar
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 YIM  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:36 am
Posts: 3556
Location: Twin Ports
It is entertaining to consider these things to be true, and some may even have an amount of truth to them. Even if there were fraud, and victory could be declared for Kerry, it would hardly be a mandate for him.

The overwhelming truth of the election was this: The democrats need to do a far better job of relating to the American public and communicating their ideas. I think it is high time there is a paradigm shift within the party regarding its policies, beliefs, and practices that must either change or become far more concise. They need to distance themselves from being referred to as the party of taxation, socialism, and no morals. If they believe their message is right and true, they have done a poor job of communicating it to the American people. The democratic movement is percieved as forming a bloated government funded with heavy taxation, ineffective social welfare, weak defense, and an anything-goes mentality when it comes to moral. If the democrats are to become a relevant political force within the next decade, I would say that difficult but necessary changes must occur.

I would advocate a party platform change that looks to service both the individual as well as the society. The employer as well as the union. The environment as well as the manufacturer. The diplomat as well as the defender. The teacher as well as the student. The hard working as well as the unemployed. A strong stance and yet also a strong belief in communication, unity, and compromise where necessary.

_________________
Rising and falling at force ten
We twist the world
And ride the wind


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 12:16 am 
Offline
User avatar
Reissued
 Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:41 pm
Posts: 23014
Location: NOT FLO-RIDIN
Gender: Male
Fact numer 21:

Many 21+ Americans don't vote. Stupid Fucks.

_________________
given2trade wrote:
Oh, you think I'm being douchey? Well I shall have to re-examine everything then. Thanks brah.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 12:17 am 
Offline
User avatar
Banned from the Pit
 Profile

Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 11:03 pm
Posts: 42
Location: Orange, Ca
stuff like that really makes your vote feel pretty worthless.

those touch screen systems are pretty scary...there really is no available record to prove that you actually voted for who you thought you did.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 12:24 am 
Offline
User avatar
Of Counsel
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:14 am
Posts: 37778
Location: OmaGOD!!!
Gender: Male
tsunami wrote:
It is entertaining to consider these things to be true, and some may even have an amount of truth to them. Even if there were fraud, and victory could be declared for Kerry, it would hardly be a mandate for him.

The overwhelming truth of the election was this: The democrats need to do a far better job of relating to the American public and communicating their ideas. I think it is high time there is a paradigm shift within the party regarding its policies, beliefs, and practices that must either change or become far more concise. They need to distance themselves from being referred to as the party of taxation, socialism, and no morals. If they believe their message is right and true, they have done a poor job of communicating it to the American people. The democratic movement is percieved as forming a bloated government funded with heavy taxation, ineffective social welfare, weak defense, and an anything-goes mentality when it comes to moral. If the democrats are to become a relevant political force within the next decade, I would say that difficult but necessary changes must occur.

I would advocate a party platform change that looks to service both the individual as well as the society. The employer as well as the union. The environment as well as the manufacturer. The diplomat as well as the defender. The teacher as well as the student. The hard working as well as the unemployed. A strong stance and yet also a strong belief in communication, unity, and compromise where necessary.


That's all well and good. But if the vote is rigged, the Democrats could run Jesus Christ himself on a platform of eternal salvation for all, and he'd lose. Well, maybe Jesus would win, but you get the point.

--PunkDavid

_________________
Unfortunately, at the Dawning of the Age of Aquarius, the Flower Children jerked off and went back to sleep.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 12:28 am 
Offline
User avatar
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 YIM  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:36 am
Posts: 3556
Location: Twin Ports
punkdavid wrote:
tsunami wrote:
It is entertaining to consider these things to be true, and some may even have an amount of truth to them. Even if there were fraud, and victory could be declared for Kerry, it would hardly be a mandate for him.

The overwhelming truth of the election was this: The democrats need to do a far better job of relating to the American public and communicating their ideas. I think it is high time there is a paradigm shift within the party regarding its policies, beliefs, and practices that must either change or become far more concise. They need to distance themselves from being referred to as the party of taxation, socialism, and no morals. If they believe their message is right and true, they have done a poor job of communicating it to the American people. The democratic movement is percieved as forming a bloated government funded with heavy taxation, ineffective social welfare, weak defense, and an anything-goes mentality when it comes to moral. If the democrats are to become a relevant political force within the next decade, I would say that difficult but necessary changes must occur.

I would advocate a party platform change that looks to service both the individual as well as the society. The employer as well as the union. The environment as well as the manufacturer. The diplomat as well as the defender. The teacher as well as the student. The hard working as well as the unemployed. A strong stance and yet also a strong belief in communication, unity, and compromise where necessary.


That's all well and good. But if the vote is rigged, the Democrats could run Jesus Christ himself and he'd lose. Well, maybe Jesus would win, but you get the point.

--PunkDavid


I understand what you're saying PD, but I don't think they would be able to cover up or change an obviously large victory for the opposition party.

What I am saying is that it is far better to win and win by a large amount, than to attack the system and cry foul in a reactionary way.

The key is to win!

What really burns me, is that there were voter problems in 2000, and apparently not enough was done in four years to correct them. If there are problems, then we need to fix them.

_________________
Rising and falling at force ten
We twist the world
And ride the wind


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 12:40 am 
Offline
User avatar
Got Some
 Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:52 pm
Posts: 1727
Location: Earth
Gender: Male
tsunami wrote:
What really burns me, is that there were voter problems in 2000, and apparently not enough was done in four years to correct them. If there are problems, then we need to fix them.


See, this is just it. These problems were purposely NOT fixed. Because the party that benefits from them not being fixed won. As you so clearly stated:

tsunami wrote:
The key is to win!


But if you can properly rig any State to go which way you want. You simply need to cover it up fast enough and hope the "Liberal" Media doesn't cover any of it. So that it all goes away quickly, and people will say weeks and months later when blatant criminal activity has taken place:

Random RMer wrote:
Quit bitching, it's over. Bush won.

_________________
"The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum."
-Noam Chomsky


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 12:43 am 
Offline
User avatar
Yeah Yeah Yeah
 YIM  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:36 am
Posts: 3556
Location: Twin Ports
I hear what you are saying IEB, and I too am not happy about voter fraud. What I think is important is that the democrats look into the fraud but also look into how they can make their party better at the same time. The future is what is important, and if they continuously occupy themselves with the past two elections, nothing will change.

Fix the system but also fix the party.

If they don't, they will lose on both accounts.

_________________
Rising and falling at force ten
We twist the world
And ride the wind


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 12:47 am 
Offline
User avatar
Force of Nature
 Profile

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 5:21 pm
Posts: 362
Location: Red Sox Nation via AZ
punkdavid wrote:
That's all well and good. But if the vote is rigged, the Democrats could run Jesus Christ himself on a platform of eternal salvation for all, and he'd lose. Well, maybe Jesus would win, but you get the point.

--PunkDavid

_________________
"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro."
-Hunter S. Thompson
RIP 1937-2005


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 12:50 am 
Offline
User avatar
Got Some
 Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:52 pm
Posts: 1727
Location: Earth
Gender: Male
tsunami wrote:
I hear what you are saying IEB, and I too am not happy about voter fraud. What I think is important is that the democrats look into the fraud but also look into how they can make their party better at the same time. The future is what is important, and if they continuously occupy themselves with the past two elections, nothing will change.

Fix the system but also fix the party.

If they don't, they will lose on both accounts.


I completely agree, that the Democrats need to do some re-evaluating. Personally I agree with this, not being a Democrat, I see where they go wrong all over the place.

But do they really need a new party platform? If it were to be proven that Bush won do to millions of votes going to him who were either voting for Kerry, were Dead, etc. Do they really need to readjust? Or do they simply need to have control over the counting of the votes and the machines they are done on. "Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything."

_________________
"The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum."
-Noam Chomsky


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 12:57 am 
Offline
User avatar
Banned from the Pit
 Profile

Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 5:01 am
Posts: 86
It's the American way. You need to cheat to get a head in life, whether its a President or to hit home runs.

_________________
The more crap you put up with, the more crap you are going to get.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 3:07 am 
Offline
User avatar
Reissued
 Profile

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:41 pm
Posts: 23014
Location: NOT FLO-RIDIN
Gender: Male
You silly conspiracy theorists.

_________________
given2trade wrote:
Oh, you think I'm being douchey? Well I shall have to re-examine everything then. Thanks brah.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: 20 Amazing Facts About Voting in America
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:37 am 
Offline
User avatar
Force of Nature
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 5:10 am
Posts: 701
IEB! wrote:
16. California banned the use of Diebold machines because the security was so bad. Despite Diebold's claims that the audit logs could not be hacked, a chimpanzee was able to do it! (See the movie here)

http://wired.com/news/evote/0,2645,63298,00.html

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4874190



Where's my monkey video?!?


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:43 am 
Offline
User avatar
Stone's Bitch
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 1918
Location: Ephrata
Bush won by like 150,000 votes in Ohio right?

How many votes would you have to rig on each machine to produce that margin?

Depending on the precinct would 25 rigged votes even go noticed?

pennies add up to dollars!

_________________
no need for those it's all over your clothes it's all over your face it's all over your nose


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:18 am 
Offline
User avatar
Supersonic
 Profile

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 2:43 am
Posts: 10694
2. There is no federal agency with regulatory authority or oversight of the U.S. voting machine industry.

Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...

Wow.

No offense, but I'm glad that no such authority exists.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 3:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Johnny Guitar
 Profile

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 6:21 pm
Posts: 104
LittleWing wrote:
2. There is no federal agency with regulatory authority or oversight of the U.S. voting machine industry.

Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...

Wow.

No offense, but I'm glad that no such authority exists.


Wow.

No offense, but what? I can understand states handling their own local elections, but the presidential election is national, and, therefore, rigid national standards should apply - not the willy-nilly "standards" that are in force today.

_________________
I'm feelin' like a preacher wavin' a gun around....


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 3:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Unthought Known
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:16 pm
Posts: 8820
What is this? The fix was in?

_________________
http://www.farmsanctuary.org

"Think occasionally of the suffering of which you spare yourself the sight" - Albert Schweitzer


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 3:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar
In a van down by the river
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:15 am
Posts: 33031
PJDoll wrote:
What is this? The fix was in?


well.....DUH

_________________
maybe we can hum along...


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 48 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Board index » Word on the Street... » News & Debate


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
It is currently Sat Nov 22, 2025 4:10 am