Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:47 am Posts: 46000 Location: Reasonville
holy lord. hannity makes a great point when he says it's dangerous that she's using religion for her platform. it's a prime example of what has ruined religion over the years.
_________________ No matter how dark the storm gets overhead They say someone's watching from the calm at the edge What about us when we're down here in it? We gotta watch our backs
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:40 am Posts: 2114 Location: Coventry
I couldn't watch much of it. They're Jihadists without head scarves, I hope one of these days they get fucking massacred the cunts. WWWWWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNNNKKKKKKKKKKKKEEEEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRRRRRSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
_________________ "If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" -Karl Popper
we’re split right in half
it’s making me crazy
a two-headed brat
tied to the other for life
a family feud
the Red and the Blue now
it’s Truth against Truth
I’ll see you in hell, I don’t mind
_________________ cirlces they grow and they swallow people whole half their lives they say goodnight to wives they'll never know got a mind full of questions and a teacher in my soul and so it goes
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:47 am Posts: 46000 Location: Reasonville
colmes is right though. it's a church of her family.
_________________ No matter how dark the storm gets overhead They say someone's watching from the calm at the edge What about us when we're down here in it? We gotta watch our backs
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:54 pm Posts: 12287 Location: Manguetown Gender: Male
Well, for the 1st time i really liked the stand that the guys from Fox News took.
_________________ There's just no mercy in your eyes There ain't no time to set things right And I'm afraid I've lost the fight I'm just a painful reminder Another day you leave behind
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 1:54 am Posts: 7189 Location: CA
corduroy_blazer wrote:
colmes is right though. it's a church of her family.
Someone has to be giving these people money because its less than 100 people and yet they are able to travel around the country year round to protest. They can't possibly be self sufficient, being such obvious dumbasses. At least I would like to think that.
Anyhow, I suggest following them around with a sound proof booth designated a "free speech zone". They should be free to wave signs and whatnot as much as they want - we just don't have to hear it if we don't want to.
colmes is right though. it's a church of her family.
Someone has to be giving these people money because its less than 100 people and yet they are able to travel around the country year round to protest. They can't possibly be self sufficient, being such obvious dumbasses. At least I would like to think that.
Anyhow, I suggest following them around with a sound proof booth designated a "free speech zone". They should be free to wave signs and whatnot as much as they want - we just don't have to hear it if we don't want to.
Then couldn't that same idea be used to silence any anti-war demonstrator? These people ahve a right to say these things and we have a right to make fun of them for the rest of their natural lives because of it.
It's not very difficult to be self-sufficient in America. Just pronouce it "ask" not "axe" and everything should be fine.
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 1:54 am Posts: 7189 Location: CA
broken_iris wrote:
simple schoolboy wrote:
corduroy_blazer wrote:
colmes is right though. it's a church of her family.
Someone has to be giving these people money because its less than 100 people and yet they are able to travel around the country year round to protest. They can't possibly be self sufficient, being such obvious dumbasses. At least I would like to think that.
Anyhow, I suggest following them around with a sound proof booth designated a "free speech zone". They should be free to wave signs and whatnot as much as they want - we just don't have to hear it if we don't want to.
Then couldn't that same idea be used to silence any anti-war demonstrator? These people ahve a right to say these things and we have a right to make fun of them for the rest of their natural lives because of it.
It's not very difficult to be self-sufficient in America. Just pronouce it "ask" not "axe" and everything should be fine.
Well if the president can get away with it, why can't local government officials? I wasn't being entirely serious, btw. As the cemeteries are privately owned, shouldn't they be able to keep protestors off the premises? If so, where do these people stand? On the street?
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:43 pm Posts: 7633 Location: Philly Del Fia Gender: Female
broken_iris wrote:
simple schoolboy wrote:
corduroy_blazer wrote:
colmes is right though. it's a church of her family.
Someone has to be giving these people money because its less than 100 people and yet they are able to travel around the country year round to protest. They can't possibly be self sufficient, being such obvious dumbasses. At least I would like to think that.
Anyhow, I suggest following them around with a sound proof booth designated a "free speech zone". They should be free to wave signs and whatnot as much as they want - we just don't have to hear it if we don't want to.
Then couldn't that same idea be used to silence any anti-war demonstrator? These people ahve a right to say these things and we have a right to make fun of them for the rest of their natural lives because of it.
It's not very difficult to be self-sufficient in America. Just pronouce it "ask" not "axe" and everything should be fine.
We all have the right of free speech, but within limits. You still can't yell 'fire' in a movie theather, and your employer still has the right to ban offensive language in your workplace.
What these people do should NOT be covered under free speech. It's harassment, and if I were any one of those families, I'd slap them with a lawsuit for the pain and suffering. It's terribly hurtful and inappropriate. Some people deserve respect under any circumstance - ESPECIALLY grieving families at a funeral. I don't care if the deceased was a cereal baby eater - it's not his family's fault.
Well if the president can get away with it, why can't local government officials? I wasn't being entirely serious, btw. As the cemeteries are privately owned, shouldn't they be able to keep protestors off the premises? If so, where do these people stand? On the street?
If it were up to me, they would a standing across teh street from my counter protest which features huge enlargments of gay pr0n movie covers with the actors dressed as Jebus.
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 1:54 am Posts: 7189 Location: CA
broken_iris wrote:
simple schoolboy wrote:
Well if the president can get away with it, why can't local government officials? I wasn't being entirely serious, btw. As the cemeteries are privately owned, shouldn't they be able to keep protestors off the premises? If so, where do these people stand? On the street?
If it were up to me, they would a standing across teh street from my counter protest which features huge enlargments of gay pr0n movie covers with the actors dressed as Jebus.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:40 am Posts: 2114 Location: Coventry
broken_iris wrote:
simple schoolboy wrote:
corduroy_blazer wrote:
colmes is right though. it's a church of her family.
Someone has to be giving these people money because its less than 100 people and yet they are able to travel around the country year round to protest. They can't possibly be self sufficient, being such obvious dumbasses. At least I would like to think that.
Anyhow, I suggest following them around with a sound proof booth designated a "free speech zone". They should be free to wave signs and whatnot as much as they want - we just don't have to hear it if we don't want to.
Then couldn't that same idea be used to silence any anti-war demonstrator? These people ahve a right to say these things and we have a right to make fun of them for the rest of their natural lives because of it.
It's not very difficult to be self-sufficient in America. Just pronouce it "ask" not "axe" and everything should be fine.
Since they were deliberately killed and these people are encouraging it, it could be construed as "glorifying terrorism". I dunno if that's an offense in America but it is here and rightfully so.
_________________ "If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" -Karl Popper
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 1:54 am Posts: 7189 Location: CA
Hallucination wrote:
broken_iris wrote:
simple schoolboy wrote:
corduroy_blazer wrote:
colmes is right though. it's a church of her family.
Someone has to be giving these people money because its less than 100 people and yet they are able to travel around the country year round to protest. They can't possibly be self sufficient, being such obvious dumbasses. At least I would like to think that.
Anyhow, I suggest following them around with a sound proof booth designated a "free speech zone". They should be free to wave signs and whatnot as much as they want - we just don't have to hear it if we don't want to.
Then couldn't that same idea be used to silence any anti-war demonstrator? These people ahve a right to say these things and we have a right to make fun of them for the rest of their natural lives because of it.
It's not very difficult to be self-sufficient in America. Just pronouce it "ask" not "axe" and everything should be fine.
Since they were deliberately killed and these people are encouraging it, it could be construed as "glorifying terrorism". I dunno if that's an offense in America but it is here and rightfully so.
I think the consensus in the "Terrorism" thread is that the generally accepted definition includes only attacks on civilians. Seeing as how these casualties were uniformed troops, it isn't terrorism per se.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:40 am Posts: 2114 Location: Coventry
simple schoolboy wrote:
Hallucination wrote:
broken_iris wrote:
simple schoolboy wrote:
corduroy_blazer wrote:
colmes is right though. it's a church of her family.
Someone has to be giving these people money because its less than 100 people and yet they are able to travel around the country year round to protest. They can't possibly be self sufficient, being such obvious dumbasses. At least I would like to think that.
Anyhow, I suggest following them around with a sound proof booth designated a "free speech zone". They should be free to wave signs and whatnot as much as they want - we just don't have to hear it if we don't want to.
Then couldn't that same idea be used to silence any anti-war demonstrator? These people ahve a right to say these things and we have a right to make fun of them for the rest of their natural lives because of it.
It's not very difficult to be self-sufficient in America. Just pronouce it "ask" not "axe" and everything should be fine.
Since they were deliberately killed and these people are encouraging it, it could be construed as "glorifying terrorism". I dunno if that's an offense in America but it is here and rightfully so.
I think the consensus in the "Terrorism" thread is that the generally accepted definition includes only attacks on civilians. Seeing as how these casualties were uniformed troops, it isn't terrorism per se.
True, I hadn't thought of that. They're treading a very fine line and it could be argued that sexuality is a civilian issue rather than a soldier issue. I reckon sooner or later they're gonna stuff up and I hope something is done when they do.
_________________ "If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" -Karl Popper
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:38 am Posts: 5575 Location: Sydney, NSW
I want my 5:42 min back.
That is news?
Well... the sad thing, is that it is news. Stuff like this has become news, exactly because retard institutions like Fox have given this stuff the label of news by providing it a platform. Loonies now know that if they act loony enough, some American media outlet will give it airtime.
I'm not sure what sickens me more. The lunatic incoherent psycho bitch, or the two ugly looking dickwads trying to appear moderate.
Sure, Hannity and Colmes both made good points in that shouting match that we have now come to accept as an "interview". First of all, is that an achievement? Secondly, why the hell is this news?
_________________
Jammer91 wrote:
If Soundgarden is perfectly fine with playing together with Tad Doyle on vocals, why the fuck is he wasting his life promoting the single worst album of all time? Holy shit, he has to be the stupidest motherfucker on earth.
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:40 am Posts: 2114 Location: Coventry
shades-go-down wrote:
I want my 5:42 min back.
That is news?
Well... the sad thing, is that it is news. Stuff like this has become news, exactly because retard institutions like Fox have given this stuff the label of news by providing it a platform. Loonies now know that if they act loony enough, some American media outlet will give it airtime.
I'm not sure what sickens me more. The lunatic incoherent psycho bitch, or the two ugly looking dickwads trying to appear moderate.
Sure, Hannity and Colmes both made good points in that shouting match that we have now come to accept as an "interview". First of all, is that an achievement? Secondly, why the hell is this news?
On the plus side though, plenty of people out there will know what she looks like when they see her in a dark ally. p.s - COME ON WEST HAM!
_________________ "If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them" -Karl Popper
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
